基于机制转换Copula模型的股市量价尾部关系研究

中国管理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 16-23.

基于机制转换Copula模型的股市量价尾部关系研究

吴吉林

山东大学经济研究院,山东济南 250100

收稿日期:2011-08-11 修回日期:2012-04-23 出版日期:2012-10-29 发布日期:2012-10-27
基金资助:
山东大学自主创新资助项目(2011GN025);山东省博士后资助项目(201103064)

Nonlinear Relationship of Tail Dependence between Price and Trading Volume in Chinese Stock Markets

WU Ji-lin

The Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China

Received:2011-08-11 Revised:2012-04-23 Online:2012-10-29 Published:2012-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对传统模型只能考察正常市场条件下的量价关系,本文构建了机制转换Copula模型来研究极端市场条件下我国股市量价间的尾部相依性,发现沪深两市收益率、绝对收益率与交易量间的尾部关系存在明显的非对称特征。高收益率、高绝对收益率对应着高交易量,而低收益率、低绝对收益率与高、低交易量不存在对应关系。另外,量价间尾部关系与机制状态有关,呈现明显的周期性动态特征与结构性变化,结构变化点对应着股市周期中较大调整的开始或结束。研究还发现沪市量价间尾部关系要强于深市,但深市收益率与交易量尾部在两机制间的变动更大,而两市绝对收益率与交易量间的尾部相依性在两机制间变动较小。

关键词: 量价关系, 尾部相依性, 机制转换, 混合Copula

Abstract: Because traditional models only capture volume-price relation under normal market condition, a regime switching Copula model is proposed to explore the tail dependence of volume-price under extreme market conditions, and it is fourd that there exist significant and asymmetric volume-price dependence at extremes for Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets. In particular, extremely (absolute)high returns tend to be associated with extremely large trading volumes, while extremely (absolute)low returns tend not to be related to either large or small volumes. Additionally, volume-price is regime-dependent and shows obvious cyclic behavior and structure change. The structure change points correspond to the starts or ends of big market adjustments. It is also found volume-price dependence in Shanghai market is much stronger than that in Shenzhen market, but return-volume dependence has a bigger range in the regimes, however, the absolute return-volume dependence of the two market range in regimes has little difference.

Key words: volume-price relation, tail dependence, regime switching, Copula

中图分类号:

F830.91

吴吉林 . 基于机制转换Copula模型的股市量价尾部关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(5): 16-23.

WU Ji-lin. Nonlinear Relationship of Tail Dependence between Price and Trading Volume in Chinese Stock Markets[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(5): 16-23.

参考文献

[1] Balduzzi P, Kallal H, Longin F. Minimal returns and the breakdown of the price-volume relation[J]. Economics Letters, 1996, 50: 265-269.
[2] Gallant A R, Rossi P E, Tauchen G. Stock prices and volume[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1992, 5: 199-242.
[3] Marsh T, Wagner N. Return-volume dependence and extremes in the international equity markets[J]. Working Paper,University of California, Berkeley,2004.
[4] Blume L, Easley D, O'Hara M. Market statistics and technical analysis: the role of volume[J]. Journal of Finance, 1994, 49: 153-181.
[5] Karpo J M. The relation between price changes and trading volume: a survey[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1987, 22: 109-126.
[6] Clark P K. A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices[J]. Econometrica, 1973, 41:135-55.
[7] Tauchen G, Pitts M. The price variability-volume relationship on speculative markets[J]. Econometrica, 1983, 51: 485-505.
[8] Lamoureux C, Lastrapes W. Heteroskedast-icity in stock return data: volume vs. GARCH effects[J]. Journal of Finance,1990, 45: 487-498.
[9] Hiemstra C, Jones J. Testing for linear and nonlinear granger causality in the stock price-volume relation[J]. Journal of Finance, 1994, 49: 1639-1664.
[10] Chen Gongmeng, Firth M, Rui O. The dynamic relation between stock returns, trading volume and volatility[J]. The Financial Review, 2001, 38: 153-174.
[11] Chuang C C, Kuan C M, Lin H Y. Causality in quantiles and dynamic stock return-volume relations[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2009, 33: 1351-1360.
[12] Brooks C. Predicting stock index volatility: can market volume help?[J]. Journal of Forecast, 1998, 17: 59-80.
[13] 陈怡玲,宋逢明. 中国股市价格变动与交易量关系的实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2000,2:62-68.
[14] 范从来,徐科军. 中国股票市场收益率与交易量相关性的实证分析[J]. 管理世界,2002, 7:31-36.
[15] 刘金全,崔畅. 中国沪深股市收益率和波动性的实证分析[J]. 经济学(季刊),2002, 1(4):885-898.
[16] 赵留彦,王一鸣. 沪深股市交易量与收益率及其波动的相关性: 来自实证分析的证据[J]. 经济科学,2003, 2: 57-67.
[17] 张维,国冀楠. 关于上海股市量价因果关系的实证探测[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,1998, 6: 111-114.
[18] 赵振全,薛丰慧. 股票市场交易量与收益率动态影响关系的计量检验[J]. 世界经济,2005, 11: 64-79.
[19] 文凤华,饶贵添,张小勇,等. 去异方差交易量与价格波动关系研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 3: 64-72.
[20] 马超群,张浩, 不同交易量股票价格的信息调整速度差异研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2005,10:18-22.
[21] 王春峰, 张亚楠, 房振明. 基于过度自信的交易量驱动因素建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2010,8:43-48.
[22] 李丹,董玲. 中国股市波动与成交量动态关系研究—基于分位数回归的角[J]. 山西财经大学学报,2008,7:76-80.
[23] 钱争鸣,郭鹏飞. 上海证券交易市场量价关系的分位回归分析[J]. 数量经济与技术经济研究,2007,10:141-151.
[24] 唐齐鸣,张学功. 基于内幕交易下的中国股市量价因果关系分析[J]. 数量经济与技术经济研究,2005, 6:95-100.
[25] Patton A. Estimation of copula models for time series of possibly different lengths[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2006, 21: 147-173.