基于风险厌恶的供应链订货时机分析

中国管理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (1): 63-70.

基于风险厌恶的供应链订货时机分析

熊恒庆^1,2, 黄勇¹, 杨建仁¹

1. 景德镇陶瓷学院工商学院, 江西景德镇 333403;
2. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2011-03-08 修回日期:2012-06-27 出版日期:2013-02-28 发布日期:2013-02-26
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(70332001)

Analysis of Order Timing based on Risk Aversion in Supply Chain

XIONG Heng-qing^1,2, HUANG Yong¹, YANG Jian-ren¹

1. School of Business, Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, Jingdezhen 333403, China;
2. School of Management, HuaZhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2011-03-08 Revised:2012-06-27 Online:2013-02-28 Published:2013-02-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于报童模型,在一个由风险厌恶型制造商和零售商组成的供应链中,分析了三种供应链订货时机:预先订货、延迟订货、柔性订货,并调查了风险厌恶对供应链的影响。不同于已有文献关于风险中性的假设,发现由于风险厌恶,在预先订货方式下零售商有最小化订货量的倾向,在延迟订货方式下制造商有最小化生产量的倾向;进一步的分析结果显示在一定条件下零售商将削减订货量至少一半,制造商利润减少至少一半。为此设计了特许费契约进行协调。认为提升企业信心、消除风险厌恶引起的不利影响,在经济萧条时有着非常重要的作用。

关键词: 订货时机, 订货延迟, 风险厌恶, 供应链协调

Abstract: Based on the newsboy model,three types of order timing are analyzed in a supply chain which consists of a risk-averse manufacturer and a risk-averse retailer. The three types of order timing are advance order, delayed order and flexible order. The influence of risk aversion on the supply chain is also examined. Different from literatures about risk neutral assumption,the results show that due to risk aversion,the retailer tends to minimize his order quantity under the mode of advance order, and the manufacturer tends to minimize her production quantity under the mode of delayed order. Further analysis shows that the retailer may cut his order quantity by at least half and the manufacturer’s profit may be reduced by at least half under certain conditions. So a Franchisee fee contract is employed to coordinate. It is suggested that enhancing business confidence and eliminating adverse influence play a very important role during economic depression.

Key words: order timing, order postponement, risk aversion, supply chain coordination

中图分类号:

F224
F253

熊恒庆, 黄勇, 杨建仁. 基于风险厌恶的供应链订货时机分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, (1): 63-70.

XIONG Heng-qing, HUANG Yong, YANG Jian-ren. Analysis of Order Timing based on Risk Aversion in Supply Chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, (1): 63-70.

参考文献

[1] Cachon G P.The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain:push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts [J].Management Science, 2004, 50(2): 222-238.
[2] Granot D, Yin Shuya.Price and order postponement in a decentralized newsvendor model with multiplicative and price-dependent demand [J].Operations Research,2008,56(1):121-139.
[3] Tong Chunyang.Order postponement in a supply chain in the presence of exponential demand with gamma prior[J].Operations Research Letters, 2010, 38(2): 97-103.
[4] Ferguson M E. When to commit in a serial supply chain with forecast updating[J].Naval Research Logistics, 2003, 50(8):917-936.
[5] Ferguson M E, Decroix G A, Zipkin P H.Commitment decisions with partial information[J].Updating Naval Research Logistics, 2005, 52(8): 780-795.
[6] Taylor T A.Sale timing in a supply chain: when to sell to the retailer [J]. Manufacturing and service operations management, 2006,8(1):23-42.
[7] Dong Lingxiu, Zhu Kaijie.Two-wholesale-price contracts:push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts [J].Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2007, 9(3): 291-311.
[8] Greenwald B C, Stiglitz J E.Asymmetric information and the new theory of the firm: financial constraints and risk behavior[J].The American Economic Review,1990, 80(2): 160-165.
[9] Li Jing, Lau H, Lau A H.A two-product newsboy problem with satisfying objective and independent exponential demands[J].IIE Transactions, 1991, 23(1): 29-39.
[10] Lanzillotti R F.Pricing objectives in large companies[J].American Economic Review, 1958, 48(5): 921-940.
[11] Shi C, Chen B.Pareto-optimal contracts for a supply chain with satisficing objectives [J].Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2007, 58(6): 751-759.
[12] Ferrante A.Conservative ordering makes inventory strategy critical to avoid stock outs this holiday season[EB/OL].(2009-10-21).http://www.Retail touch points.com/retail-store-ops /306 conservative ordering makes inventory strategy critical to avoid stock outs this holiday season.html.

[1]	丁军飞,陈伟达,付帅帅. 再制造环境下基于碳期权合约的供应链定价与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 95-104.
[2]	马雪丽,赵颖,柏庆国,薄洪光. 考虑保鲜努力与碳减排努力的生鲜品三级冷链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 52-61.
[3]	浦徐进,赖德凌,金德龙. 按收购量补贴还是按收购价补贴？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 32-40.
[4]	代建生, 李玲. 损失规避和资金约束下考虑促销的供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 183-193.
[5]	耿心宇, 秦开大. 基于多物品委托拍卖的供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(5): 260-268.
[6]	徐琪,董琦,史保莉. 考虑策略型消费者的期权组合订购与预售联合决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 193-202.
[7]	李剑,史金阳,姜宝. 船公司“利他偏好”与航运供应链上的纵向合作[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 195-207.
[8]	邱若臻, 吴旭, 孙月, 朱珠. 不确定需求下考虑大数据投资决策的供应链鲁棒优化及协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 128-141.
[9]	代建生, 刘悦. 公平偏好和销售努力下供应链期权契约协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 20-30.
[10]	杨朝军, 周仕盈, , 丁专鑫, 马征程. 资产配置中投资者风险偏好的量化——兼论长短期风险偏好的关联[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 11-21.
[11]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 周琨. 期权契约机制下应急物资储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(12): 338-351.
[12]	王玉燕, 苏梅, 王晓迪. 政府奖励机制下闭环供应链的利他关切性决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11): 105-116.
[13]	王旭坪, 樊文平, 阮俊虎, 孙自来. 考虑纵向持股的现代农业供应链运营决策与协调优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 165-176.
[14]	罗岭. 库存成本变化的VMI供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 187-197.
[15]	曹裕, 易超群, 万光羽. 碳税政策下随机双渠道库存与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 111-123.