考虑溢出效应的互补品企业间广告决策模型研究

中国管理科学 ›› 2013, Vol. ›› Issue (2): 66-75.

考虑溢出效应的互补品企业间广告决策模型研究

但斌¹, 田丽娜², 董绍辉²

1. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400044;
2. 河北科技大学经济管理学院, 河北石家庄 050018

收稿日期:2011-04-04 修回日期:2013-01-08 出版日期:2013-04-30 发布日期:2013-04-25
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272086,70972056);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC630038)

Research on Advertising Decision-making Model between Complementary Goods Enterprises Considering Spillover Effect

DAN Bin¹, TIAN Li-na², DONG Shao-hui²

1. College of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
2. School of Economy and Management, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China

Received:2011-04-04 Revised:2013-01-08 Online:2013-04-30 Published:2013-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 具有需求信息优势的企业常常将广告投入作为市场需求信号,有选择地向其互补品生产企业传递需求信息,以刺激其增加广告投入,通过溢出效应获取更大收益。针对这一问题,本文建立了考虑溢出效应的互补品企业间广告决策的信号博弈模型,得到了分离均衡和混同均衡的存在条件,分析了均衡状态下企业的最优广告决策和收益,讨论了企业的广告策略选择。结果表明,分离均衡下,具有信息优势的制造商无法利用广告投入信号刺激其互补品制造商增加广告投入。混同均衡下,只有当市场需求为低时,具有信息优势的制造商能够利用广告投入信号,刺激其互补品制造商增加广告投入,通过溢出效应获得更大收益。最后,通过一个数值算例验证了有关结论的有效性。

关键词: 互补品, 溢出效应, 广告决策, 不完全信息, 信号博弈

Abstract: The manufacturer with demand information superiority will send demand information to complementary manufacturer by using advertising as signal of demand in order to stimulate its adverting investment and obtain more profits. To settle this problem, the signaling game theory model on advertising decision-making between complementary goods manufacturers considering spillover effect is established in this paper. Based on the model, the condition of separating and pooling equilibrium are solved, and the optimal advertising strategies and profits of complementary manufacturers under these two equilibriums are analyzed. Additionally, the advertising strategy choices of complementary manufacturers are discussed. The results show that under the separating equilibrium, the manufacturer with information superiority can't stimulate its complement manufacturer to increase advertising investment by using advertising as signal. Under pooling equilibrium, only when the market demand is low, the manufacturer with information superiority can stimulate its complement manufacturer to increase advertising investment by using advertising as signal and obtain more profits from advertising spillover effect. Finally, a numerical example is given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the relevant conclusions.

Key words: complementary goods, spillover effect, advertising decision-making, incomplete information, signaling game

中图分类号:

F713.50

但斌, 田丽娜, 董绍辉. 考虑溢出效应的互补品企业间广告决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, (2): 66-75.

DAN Bin, TIAN Li-na, DONG Shao-hui. Research on Advertising Decision-making Model between Complementary Goods Enterprises Considering Spillover Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, (2): 66-75.

参考文献

[1] 吴江华, 翟昕. 信息共享对供应链合作广告影响的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(5): 98-105.
[2] Li S X, Huang Zhimin, Zhu J, et al. Cooperative advertising, game theory and manufacturer-retailer supply chains [J]. Omega, 2002, 30(1): 347-357.
[3] 钟宝嵩, 李悝, 李宏余. 基于供应链的合作促销与定价问题 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, 12(3): 69-74.
[4] Ahmadi-Javi A, Hoseinpour P. On a cooperative advertising model for a supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 219(2): 458-466.
[5] Xie Jinxing, Wei J C. Coordinating advertising and pricing in a manufacturer-retailer channel[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 197(2): 785-791.
[6] Aust G, Buscher U. Vertical cooperative advertising and pricing decisions in a manufacturer-retailer supply chain: A game-theoretic approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 223(2): 473-482.
[7] 王磊, 梁樑, 吴德胜,等. 零售商竞争下的垂直合作广告模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, 13(2): 63-69.
[8] Cellini R, Lambertini L. Advertising with spillover effects in a differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods [J]. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2003, 11(4): 409-423.
[9] Bass F M, Krishnamoorthy A, Prasad A, et al. Generic and brand advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly[J]. Marketing Science, 2005, 24(4): 556-568.
[10] Norman G, Pepall L, Richards D. Generic product advertising, spillovers, and market concentration [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008, 90(3): 719-732.
[11] Brady M. Advertising effectiveness and spillover: Simulating strategic interaction using advertising[J]. System Dynamics Review, 2009, 25(4): 281-307.
[12] Gabszewicz J, Sonnac N, Wauthy X. On price competition with complementary goods[J]. Economics Letters, 2001, 70(1): 431-437.
[13] Bhaskaran S R, Gilbert S M. Selling and leasing strategies for durable goods with complementary products[J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(8): 1278-1290.
[14] Bagwell K, Ramey G. Advertising and pricing to deter or accommodate entry when demand is unknown[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1990, 8(1): 93-113.
[15] Albak S, Overgaard P B. Upstream pricingand advertising signal downstream demand [J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1992, 1(4): 677-698.
[16] Coughlan A T. Distribution channel choice in a market with complementary goods [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1987, 4(2): 85-97.
[17] 莫塔. 竞争政策-理论与实践[M]. 沈国华译, 上海: 上海财经大学出版社, 2006: 466.
[18] Zhang H. Vertical information exchange in a supply chain with duopoly retailers [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2002, 11(4): 531-546.
[19] 马丁. 高级产业经济学[M]. 史东辉,译. 上海: 上海财经大学出版社, 2003: 295-296.
[20] 博尔顿, 德瓦特里庞. 合同理论 [M]. 费方域, 蒋士成, 郑育家,译. 上海: 格致出版社, 上海三联书店, 上海人民出版社, 2008: 74.