基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价

中国管理科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 98-104.

基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价

薛晖¹, 郑中华², 谢启伟³

1. 天津大学继续教育学院, 天津 300072;
2. 中国人民大学教育学院, 北京 100872;
3. 中国科学院自动化研究所, 北京 100190

收稿日期:2012-06-27 修回日期:2012-12-19 出版日期:2014-04-20 发布日期:2014-04-23
作者简介:薛晖（1968- ），男（汉族），河南孟州人，天津大学继续教育学院，助理研究员，研究方向：高等教育管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（70773052）

An Approach on the Performance Evaluation Problems Based on Multiple DEA Models and Gini Criterion——Evaluating the Performance of Universities in China

XUE Hui¹, ZHENG Zhong-hua², XIE Qi-wei³

1. Tianjin University School of Continuing Education, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. School of Education, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
3. Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Received:2012-06-27 Revised:2012-12-19 Online:2014-04-20 Published:2014-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对多种数据包络分析（Data Envelopment Analysis，简称DEA）模型会产生不同绩效评价结果的问题，提出基于Gini准则科学地融合各DEA模型结果的方法。首先基于Gini准则定义信息纯度以衡量各DEA模型结果的确定性并赋予权重，然后通过加权融合最终得出客观唯一的综合效率。此外，根据评价者的偏好信息或先验知识，进一步提出交互式多DEA模型-Gini准则方法。以前学者仅从单一角度出发选择DEA模型评价高校的运营绩效，考虑到从不同角度出发的多种DEA模型可以给出高校更加全面客观的运营绩效评价，利用以上方法对2011年国内25所理工类高校的运营绩效进行了实证分析，结果验证了以上方法可以合理有效的衡量各高校的运营绩效表现，对于高校运营绩效的评价研究具有实际指导意义。

关键词: 绩效评价, 数据包络分析, Gini准则, 综合效率

Abstract: To deal with the problem that multiple DEA models might generate different performance evaluation results, an approach based on the Gini criterion is proposed by fusing the results together scientifically. Firstly, the purity of information based on the Gini criterion is defined to measure the certainty of the results, and then the weights are given to each DEA model. A unique set of comprehensive efficiencies can be obtained by weighting the results of each DEA model and the corresponding model weight. Moreover, considering the preference and priori information of estimators, interactive multiple DEA models and Gini criterion approach are further proposed. Measuring the performance of higher education colleges is one of important applications in DEA, and previous researches study the problem just choose the evaluation DEA model from a single point of view. It would be more comprehensive and objective if multiple DEA models that are from multiple points of view are used. Consequently, applying the proposed method to evaluate the performance of 25 science and engineering universities in 2011, and the empirical results show that the approach is reasonable and effective, which has practical significance in the research of measuring the performance of higher education colleges.

Key words: performance evaluation, data envelopment analysis, Gini criterion, comprehensive efficiency

中图分类号:

C934

薛晖, 郑中华, 谢启伟. 基于多种DEA模型和Gini准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(4): 98-104.

XUE Hui, ZHENG Zhong-hua, XIE Qi-wei. An Approach on the Performance Evaluation Problems Based on Multiple DEA Models and Gini Criterion——Evaluating the Performance of Universities in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 98-104.

参考文献

[1] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429—444.

[2] Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984, 30(9): 1078—1092.

[3] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Seiford L M, et al. A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1982, 16(5): 223—224.

[4] Andersen P, Petersen N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in DEA[J]. Management Science, 1993, 39(10): 126—1264.

[5] Du Juan, Liang Liang, Zhu J. A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: A comment[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204(3): 694—697.

[6] 王赫一, 张屹山. 两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究——兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (2): 114—120.

[7] 马雁军.基于非参数回归技术的DEA两分步法优化与政府绩效评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, (2): 157—164.

[8] 陆志鹏, 王洁方, 刘思峰, 等. 区间DEA模型求解算法及其在项目投资效率评价中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(4): 165—169.

[9] Cooper W W, Sieford L M, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA solver software (2nd ed.)[M]. 2th ed. New York: Springer, 2006.

[10] Soleimani-damaneh M, Zarepisheh M. Shannon's entropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: Method and application[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(3): 5146—5150.

[11] Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone C J, Olshen R A. Classification and Regression Trees[M]. New York: Chapman&Hall/CRC, 1983.

[12] Beasley J E. Determining teaching and research efficiencies[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1995, 46(4): 441—452.

[13] Athanassopoulos A D, Shale E. Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education institutions in the UK by means of data envelopment analysis[J]. Education Economics, 1997, 5(2): 117—134.

[14] Abbott M, Doucouliagos C. The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis[J]. Economics of Education Review, 2003, 22(1): 89—97.

[15] José M F d F, Joo N d F, Jair d S L. A DEA methodology to evaluate the impact of information asymmetry on the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations with an application to higher education in Brazil[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2011, 173(1): 39—56.

[16] 王晓红, 王雪峰, 翟爱梅, 等. 一种基于DEA和多指标综合评价的大学科研绩效评价方法[J]. 中国软科学, 2004, (8): 156—160.

[17] 闫现洋, 余小萍. 基于DEA方法的高校图书馆学科馆员服务绩效评价研究——基于西南大学图书馆学科馆员的实证分析[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2011, 2(5): 88—92.

[18] 徐娟. 我国各省高校科研投入产出相对效率评价研究——基于数据包络分析方法[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2009, 30(2): 76—80.

[19] 殷俊明, 王平心. 基于DEA的高等学校内部院系绩效评价[J]. 管理评论, 2011, 23(7): 108—114.

[20] Friedman S S. Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: The case of industrial branches[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 1998, 25(9): 781—791.

[21] Cook W D, Liang L, Zha Y, et al. A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2009, 60(2): 276-281(6).