基于绩效源分析的组织-员工发展匹配集结决策模型研究

中国管理科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 142-148.

• 论文 • 上一篇

基于绩效源分析的组织-员工发展匹配集结决策模型研究

余顺坤¹, 王巧莲¹, 尹昌洁²

1. 华北电力大学经济与管理学院, 北京 102206;
2. 华北电力大学控制与计算机工程学院, 北京 102206

收稿日期:2013-01-03 修回日期:2014-02-12 出版日期:2014-04-20 发布日期:2014-04-23
作者简介:余顺坤（1963- ），男（汉族），江苏宜兴人，华北电力大学经济与管理学院，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：企业管理、现代人力资源管理理论与实践研究、技术经济及管理.
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目（13MS33）

Aggregating Decision Model in Organization-Employee Development Matching based on Performance Origin Analysis

YU Shun-kun¹, WANG Qiao-lian¹, YIN Chang-jie²

1. School of Economics and Management, College of North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
2. School of Control and Computer engineering, College of North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2013-01-03 Revised:2014-02-12 Online:2014-04-20 Published:2014-04-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 企业发展需要相匹配的人力资源支撑，岗位-员工发展匹配决策非常重要。本文以电力企业中层干部岗位的员工发展匹配决策研究为例，基于岗位绩效来源分析，筛选提取组织-员工发展匹配决策的指标维度，并配套特征行为描述，应用DLWA等算子充分集成多个周期的绩效信息与客观决策数据信息，结合专家组多属性发展匹配评价，应用决策矩阵和判断矩阵的集结模型有效集结决策依据信息和判断偏好信息，形成匹配优先序列，为组织-员工发展匹配及岗位员工绩效提升奠定基础。

关键词: 绩效源, 集结, 组织-员工, 匹配决策

Abstract: Because of the needs of human resource support which is matched to the development of core business, it is particularly important to build model on organization-employee development fitness. Aimed at the problem of organization-employee development fitness of middle-level cadres in power enterprises, a model is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the indexes and dimensions for organization-employee development fitness with behavior characteristic characterization are filtered and extracted based on the analysis sources of performance in middle-level cadres. Secondly, with application of DLWA and other operators, operator, several phase performance information and objective decision information are integrated. Then, multi-attribute development fitness is evaluated by Expert Group. Finally, aggregate model aggregated by decision matrix judgment matrix is applied to aggregate basis information for decision-making and preference information for judgment, forming the priority sequence of matching, which provides data support for fitness decision-making, and lays the foundation of organization-employee development fitness degree and performance improvement of employees.

Key words: the origin of performance, aggregation, organization-employee, matching decision making

中图分类号:

C939

余顺坤, 王巧莲, 尹昌洁. 基于绩效源分析的组织-员工发展匹配集结决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(4): 142-148.

YU Shun-kun, WANG Qiao-lian, YIN Chang-jie. Aggregating Decision Model in Organization-Employee Development Matching based on Performance Origin Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 142-148.

参考文献

[1] Piasentin K A. How do employees conceptualize fit? Development of a multidimensional measure of subjective person-organization fit[D]. Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary, 2007.

[2] Kristof A L. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1996, 49(1): 1-49.

[3] Bretz R D J, Judge T A. Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1994, (44): 32-54.

[4] Vandenberghe C. Organizational culture, person-culture fit, and turnover: a replication in the health care industry[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1999, 20(2): 175-184.

[5] Westerman J A, Cyr L A. An integrative analysis of person-organization fit theories[J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2004, 12(3): 252-261.

[6] Piasentin K A, Chapman D S. Perceived similarity and complementarity as predictor of subjective person-organization fit[J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2007, 80(2): 341-354.

[7] Jung H S, Namkung Y, Yoon H H. The effects of employees' business ethical value on person-organization fit and turnover intent in the food service industry[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2010, 29(3):538-546.

[8] Schneider B. The people make the place[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1987, 40(3): 437-453.

[9] Schneider B. Fits about fit[J]. Applied psychology: An international review, 2001, 50 (1): 141-152.

[10] Schneider B, Goldstein H W, Smith D B. The ASA frame work: An update[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1995, 48(4): 747-773.

[11] Jansen K J, Kristof-Brown A. Toward a multidimensional theory of person environment fit[J]. Journal of Managerial Issues, 2006, 18(2): 193-212.

[12] Kristof-Browna L, Zimmerman R D, Johnson E C. Consequences of individuals'fit at work: A meta of person job, person organization, person group, and person supervisor fit[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2005, 58(2): 281-342.

[13] 张勉, 张德, 于丹.期望匹配度对个体效能变量的影响实证研究[J].预测, 2004, 22(4):15-22.

[14] 王萍.人与组织匹配的理论与方法的研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2007.

[15] 王忠, 张琳.个人一组织匹配、工作满意度与员工离职意向关系的实证研究[J].管理学报, 2010, 7(3): 379-385.

[16] Mikhailov L.A fuzzy approach to deriving priorities from interval pairwise comparison judgements[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 159: 687-704.

[17] 徐泽水, 赵华.偏好信息为模糊互反判断矩阵的模糊多属性决策法[J].模糊系统与数学, 2004, 18(4):610-616.

[18] Zhu Jianjun, Liu Shixin, Wang Mengguang. Integration of weights model of interval numbers comparison matrix[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2005, 31(3):6-11.

[19] 张方伟, 姚炳学, 王志强.一种新的区间数多属性决策权重信息集结方法[J].模糊系统与数学, 2007, 21(6):135-140.

[20] Takami H. An optimal current-control of permanent magnet synchronous motor by ILQ design method[J].Trans of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 2002, 38(8):718-725.

[21] Fujii M, Fujii T. Reference model based ILQ servo design method[C]. Proceeding of the 46th Annual Conference of the Institute of System, Control and Information Engineers, Kyoto, 2002.

[22] Kunimatsu S, Fujii T, Tsujino T. Quadratic stablization of ILQ servo systems with generalized reference inputs[J].Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 2003, 39(3):307-309.

[23] Xu Zeshui. On multi-period multi-attribute decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008, 21(2): 164-171.

[24] Xu Zeshui. Multiple-period mutli-attribute group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2009, 38(11): 823-850

[25] 朱宁宁, 朱建军, 丁叶, 等.基于语言评价信息的快速集结方法研究[J].中国管理科学, 2009, 8:121-125.

[26] 王其藩.系统动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 1994.

[27] Xu Zeshui.On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operaters[J]. International Journal of General Systems, 2006, 35(1):17-28.

[28] 徐泽水.不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2004.

[29] Xu Zeshui.On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operators[J]. International Journal of General System, 2006, 35(1):17-28.

[30] 徐泽水.基于语言信息的决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社, 2008.

[31] 徐泽水.层次分析新标度法[J].系统工程理论与实践, 1998, 18(10):74-77.

[32] 朱建军.群决策信息分析及集结模型研究[M].北京:科学出版社, 2012.

基于绩效源分析的组织-员工发展匹配集结决策模型研究

Aggregating Decision Model in Organization-Employee Development Matching based on Performance Origin Analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王浩伦. 基于直觉语言粗糙CoCoSo-H的废旧动力电池回收技术选择模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 24-37.
[2]	李磊, 张曙阳. 共识条件下最小最大妥协的直觉模糊数集结方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 168-176.
[3]	任嵘嵘, 孟一鸣, 李晓奇, 赵萌. 基于一致性度量的概率模糊语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 220-230.
[4]	周莹, 易平涛, 郭亚军. 心理阈值协同视角下的群体评价方法及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 158-163.
[5]	余顺坤, 杨文茵. 组织-员工发展积分模型与应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 168-178.
[6]	刘健, 刘思峰, 马义中, 汪建均. 基于心理阈值的多属性决策问题目标调整研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 123-130.
[7]	胡明礼, 张彩芬, 朱建军. 基于贝叶斯网络推理的双重不确定信息集结模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(2): 135-141.
[8]	张发明. 基于交互密度算子的交互式群体评价信息集结方法及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(12): 142-148.
[9]	燕蜻, 梁吉业. 混合多属性群决策中的群体一致性分析方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(6): 133-140.
[10]	朱建军, 刘思峰, 田飞. 群决策中三端点语言和互补偏好信息的转化及集结研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 141-147.
[11]	张发明, 郭亚军, 易平涛. 一种主客方协作式群体评价方法及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(4): 145-151.
[12]	王坚强, 吴建文. 基于区间灰色不确定语言的多准则决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(3): 107-111.
[13]	朱宁宁, 朱建军, 丁叶, 刘思峰. 基于语言评价信息的快速集结方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(4): 121-125.
[14]	和媛媛, 周德群, 王强. 基于模糊判断矩阵的群决策方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(2): 128-131.
[15]	姜艳萍, 樊治平. 一种具有不同粒度语言判断矩阵的群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, (6): 104-108.