公平偏好下的多任务目标与国企高管薪酬激励

中国管理科学 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7): 82-93.

公平偏好下的多任务目标与国企高管薪酬激励

晏艳阳¹, 金鹏²

1. 湖南大学金融与统计学院, 湖南长沙 410079;
2. 中国银行湖南省分行, 湖南长沙 410005

收稿日期:2012-02-10 修回日期:2012-12-30 出版日期:2014-07-20 发布日期:2014-07-24
作者简介:晏艳阳（1962-），女（汉族），湖南益阳人，湖南大学金融与统计学院，教授，博士生导师，研究方向：公司金融、金融统计。
基金资助:
教育部博士点基金资助项目（20110161110022）；国家自然科学基金重点项目（71031004）；国家自然基金创新研究群体项目（71221001）；教育部创新团队项目（IRT0916）；湖南省自然科学基金创新群体项目（09JJT02）

Research on Multi-task and SOEs’Executive Compensation Incentive Based on Fairness Preference

YAN Yan-yang¹, JIN Peng²

1. College of Finance and Statistics, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China;
2. Bank of China Hunan Branch, Changsha 410005, China

Received:2012-02-10 Revised:2012-12-30 Online:2014-07-20 Published:2014-07-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过将委托人和代理人公平偏好同时引入到多任务的委托代理模型中，研究国企高管和政府主管部门均具公平偏好下的国企高管最优薪酬机制。研究发现，在企业经营任务目标激励方面，当多任务成本函数为独立关系、互补关系或者替代性足够小的，国企委托人和代理人公平偏好将通过直接和间接的影响途径共同促进高管最优薪酬向公平工资回归，其中，间接影响表现为公平偏好先影响最优薪酬激励强度进而间接地影响总体薪酬水平；在此过程中，政府主管部门公平偏好和高管同情偏好对最优薪酬激励强度的影响，呈现出替代效应。在社会责任任务目标激励方面，显性薪酬激励不是有效的激励方式，因此政府应该借助于隐性激励方式来激励该任务目标的实现。研究还发现教育程度较高的高管具有更强的公平偏好心理。

关键词: 公平偏好, 多任务委托代理, 薪酬激励, 国有企业

Abstract: Through bringing fairness preference of principal and agent into multi-task principal-agent model, optimal incentive mechanism of SOEs'executives are studied based on fairness preference. The results show that in the aspect of production task, when multi-task cost function is independent and complementary or substitution is enough small, the fairness of SOEs'principal and agent would make optimal compensation back to fair level by the paths of both direct and indirect impact. And the indirect impact represents that fairness firstly impacts expect compensation by impacting optimal incentive intensity firstly. The fairness preference between principal and agent exists substitutive effect. In the aspect of social stability task, explicit incentive is not efficient way for this task, so government needs resort to implicit incentive. Besides, it can be found that the executive with higher education level has more strong fairness preference.

Key words: fairness preference, multi-task principal-agent, compensation incentive, SOEs

中图分类号:

F062.5

晏艳阳, 金鹏. 公平偏好下的多任务目标与国企高管薪酬激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(7): 82-93.

YAN Yan-yang, JIN Peng. Research on Multi-task and SOEs’Executive Compensation Incentive Based on Fairness Preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(7): 82-93.

参考文献

[1] Bebchuk J, Fried J. Pay without performance [M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 2004.

[2] Grund C, Westergaard-Nielsen N. The dispersion of employees'wage increases and firms performance[J]. Industrial and Labor Relations Review,2008,(4):485-501.

[3] Martins P S. Dispersion in wage premiums and firm performance[J]. Economics Letters, 2008,101(1): 63-65.

[4] 张正堂.企业内部薪酬差距对组织未来绩效影响的实证研究[J]. 会计研究,2008,(9):81-87.

[5] Fong E A. CEO pay fairness as a predictor of stakeholder management[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2010,63(4):404-410.

[6] 高明华.中国上市公司高管薪酬指数报告[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2011.

[7] Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S,et al. In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies[J]. The American Economic Review, 2001,91:73-78.

[8] Clark A E,Masclet D, Villeval M. Effort and comparison income:Experimental and survey evidence[J]. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 2010,63(3):407-425.

[9] Nicholas A. Fairness as a constraint on reciprocity: Playing simultaneously as dictator and trustee[J]. the Journal of Socio-Economics, 2012,41(2):211-221.

[10] 晏艳阳,金鹏. 委托人公平偏好下国企高管的最优激励组合[J]. 财经研究, 2012,(12): 128-139.

[11] Fehr E, Schmidt K F. A theory of fairness, competition,and cooperation[J]. the Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,8:817-867.

[12] Bolton G E, Ockenfels A. ERC: Atheory of equity, reciprocity, and competition[J]. The American Economic Review,2000,90(1):166-193.

[13] Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics[J]. The American Economic Review, 1993,83(5):1281-1302.

[14] Skott P. Fairness as a source of hysteresis in employment and relative wages[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2005,57(3): 305-331.

[15] Demougin D, Fluet C, Helm C. Output and wages with inequality averse agents[J]. Canadian journal of economics, 2006,39:399-413.

[16] Englmaier F, Wambach A. Optimal incentive contracts under inequity aversion[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2010,69(2):312-328.

[17] 魏光兴,覃燕红.激励合约线性结构的行为合约理论解释[J]. 管理科学,2010,(23):75-80.

[18] 黄再胜,王玉.公平偏好,薪酬管制与国企高管激励[J]. 财经研究,2009,1:16-27.

[19] Königstein M,Kovács J, Zala-Mezö. Fairness in a one-principal-two-agents game a post-experimental questionnaire analysis[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2003, 24: 491-503.

[20] Fehr E,Schmidt K F. Fairness and incentives in a multi-task principal-agent model[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2004, 106(3): 453-474.

[21] Holmstrom B, Milgrom P. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design[J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1991,7: 24-52.

[22] 朱克江. 经营者薪酬激励机制架构分析[J]. 唯实,2002,(11):16-20

[23] Cowherd D M, Levine D I.Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1992,37(2):302-320.

[24] 董志勇.行为经济学中的社会公平态度与价值取向研究[J]. 中国工业经济,2006,(10):75-81.