顾客策略行为下基于CVaR和回购契约的供应链决策模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.02.010

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 80-91.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.02.010

顾客策略行为下基于CVaR和回购契约的供应链决策模型

张新鑫¹, 侯文华¹, 申成霖²

1. 南开大学商学院, 天津 300071;
2. 天津工业大学管理学院, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2013-03-11 修回日期:2014-01-27 出版日期:2015-02-20 发布日期:2015-02-28
作者简介:张新鑫(1980-),女(锡伯族),河北邯郸人,南开大学商学院,博士研究生,研究方向:对策与决策理论、供应链管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71071080);国家社会科学基金青年基金项目(13CGL058);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC630174);中国博士后科学基金(2014M551025)

Decision Models for Supply Chain Based on CVaR and Buyback Contract under Strategic Consumer Behavior

ZHANG Xin-xin¹, HOU Wen-hua¹, SHEN Cheng-lin²

1. Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China;
2. School of Management, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2013-03-11 Revised:2014-01-27 Online:2015-02-20 Published:2015-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 依据条件风险值CVaR度量准则,建立了顾客策略行为下基于回购契约的供应链决策模型,分析了集中式供应链系统和分散式供应链系统中,风险规避供应商和风险规避零售商的决策行为。在此基础上,通过理论求解和数值分析,进一步探讨了顾客策略行为、成员风险规避性和供应链回购契约的交互影响。主要研究结论如下:第一,当供应链成员均为风险规避时,价格承诺可成为顾客策略行为的完美应对策略;第二,最优回购价格受到零售商和供应商的风险规避度的共同影响,零售商的最优订货量随产品回购价格的增加而增加;第三,当且仅当零售商与供应商的风险规避度相当时,回购契约能够实现分散式供应链系统的协调和利润在不同成员间的任意分配,否则回购契约不能实现供应链利润在不同成员间的任意分配。第四,当供应链成员风险规避不等时,零售商的利润分成随顾客对产品估价的增加而增加。同时,风险规避度较小方需要出让部分利润给风险规避度较大方才能够保证契约的实施。

关键词: 顾客策略行为, CVaR, 回购契约, 风险规避, 供应链

Abstract: In CVaR framework, decision models for supply chain are proposed based on buyback contract and strategic consumer behavior. Decision behaviors of risk-averse members in both centralized and decentralized supply chain are investigated. In addition, the interactions among strategic consumer behavior, members' risk-aversion and buyback contract are discussed by theoretical analysis and numerical study. The main results are as follows: First, the price commitment can become a perfect strategy to reduce the negative impacts of strategic customer behavior when supplier and retailer are both risk-averse. Second, the optimal buyback price is influenced by members' risk-aversion and the optimal ordering quantity increases with the growth of the buyback price under the decentralized supply chain. Third, buyback contract can coordinate the supply chain perfectly if and only if retailer's risk-averse factor equals to supplier's risk-averse factor. Otherwise, the profit cannot be allocated arbitrarily between supply chain members based on buyback contract. Finally, when retailer's risk-averse factor does not equal to supplier's risk-averse factor, retailer's profit-sharing will increases with the rising of consumers' valuation, and the player with lower risk-aversion has to give a part of profit to the one with higher risk-aversion so as to guarantee the implement of the contract.

Key words: strategic consumer behavior, CVaR, buyback contract, risk-aversion, supply chain

中图分类号:

F270

张新鑫, 侯文华, 申成霖. 顾客策略行为下基于CVaR和回购契约的供应链决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2): 80-91.

ZHANG Xin-xin, HOU Wen-hua, SHEN Cheng-lin. Decision Models for Supply Chain Based on CVaR and Buyback Contract under Strategic Consumer Behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(2): 80-91.

参考文献

[1] Su Xuanming. Inter-temporal pricing with strategic customer behavior [J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(5): 726-741.

[2] 计国君,杨光勇. 战略顾客下最惠顾客保证对提前购买的价值[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(7): 16-25.

[3] Shen Z J M, Su Xuanming. Customer behavior modeling in revenue management and auctions: A review and new research opportunities [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2007, 16(6): 713-728.

[4] 崔崟,陈剑,肖勇波. 行为库存管理研究综述及前景展望[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 96-108.

[5] 申成霖,张新鑫. 运营管理中策略性消费行为研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2010, 32(7): 40-48.

[6] 李根道,熊中楷,李薇. 收益管理的动态定价研究综述[J]. 管理评论, 2010, 22(4): 97-108.

[7] Su Xuanming, Zhang Fuqiang. Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance [J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(10): 1759-1773.

[8] Cachon G P, Swinney R. Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers [J]. Management Science, 2009, 55(3): 497-511.

[9] Cachon G P, Swinney R. The value of fast fashion: Quick response, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior [J].Management Science, 2011, 57(4):778-795.

[10] Swinney R. Selling to strategic consumers when product value is uncertain: The value of matching supply and demand [J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(10): 1737-1751.

[11] Kim S H, Swinney R. Product quality choice and inventory risk with strategic consumers, Working paper, Stanford University, 2011.

[12] 李娟,黄培清,顾锋. 基于顾客战略行为下的供应链的绩效研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(4): 77-82.

[13] 齐二石,杨道箭,刘亮. 基于顾客战略行为的供应链两部定价契约[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2010, 16(4): 828-833.

[14] 杨道箭,齐二石,姜宏. 基于顾客策略行为的供货水平与供应链绩效[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2010, 16(9): 1984-1991.

[15] 杨道箭,齐二石,魏峰. 顾客策略行为与风险偏好下供应链利润分享[J]. 管理科学学报,2011, 14(12): 50-59.

[16] 黄松,杨超,张曦. 考虑战略顾客行为时的供应链性能分析与协调[J]. 管理科学学报,2012, 15(2): 47-57.

[17] Gan Xianghua, Sethi S, Yan Houmin. Coordination of supply chains with risk-averse agents [J].Production and Operations Management, 2004, 13(2):135-149.

[18] Andy A T. Risk sensitivity in distribution channel partnerships: Implications for manufacturer return policies [J]. Journal of Retailing, 2002, 78(2): 147-160.

[19] Lau H, Lau A. Manufacturer's pricing strategy and return policy for a single-period commodity [J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 1999, 116(2): 291-304.

[20] Tsay A. Risk sensitivity in distribution channel partnerships implications for manufacturer return policies [J]. Journal of Retailing, 2002, 78(2): 147-160.

[21] Choi T M, Li Duan, Yan Houmin. Mean-variance analysis of a single supplier and retailer supply chain under return policies [J].European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 184(1): 356-376.

[22] 姚忠. 风险约束下退货合同对供应链的协调性分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2008, 11(3): 96-105.

[23] Xiao Tiaojun, Choi T M. Purchasing choices and channel structure strategies for a two-echelon system with risk-averse player [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 120(1): 54-65.

[24] 林志炳,张岐山,蔡晨. 风险厌恶假设下的供应链回购契约模型[J]. 预测, 2010, 29(6): 53-56.

[25] 许明辉,于刚,张汉勤. 带有缺货惩罚的报童模型中的CVaR研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(10): 1-8.

[26] 李建斌,张汉勤,于刚. 带有市场搜索的供应链最优策略的分析与比较[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(10): 53-62.

[27] 于春云,赵希男,彭艳东,等. 基于条件风险值理论的供应链优化与协调模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2007, 15(3): 31-39.

[28] Hsieh C, Lu Yuting. Manufacturer's return policy in a two-stage supply chain with two risk-averse retailers and random demand [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1): 514-523.

[29] 安智宇,周晶. 考虑供应商违约风险的CVaR最优订货模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2): 66-70.

[30] 林强,叶飞,陈晓明. 随机弹性需求条件下基于CVaR与收益共享契约的供应链决策模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(12): 2296-2312.

[31] 李绩才,周永务,钟远光. 基于CVaR准则的Newsboy型商品最优广告费用与订货策略[J]. 系统工程理论实践, 2012, 32(4): 776-783.

[32] Ma Lijun, Liu Fangmei, Li Sijie,et al. Channel bargaining with risk-averse retailer [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 139(1): 155-167.

[33] Pastemack B. Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities [J]. Marketing Science, 1985, 4(2): 166-176.

[34] Padmanabhan P. Manufacturer's returns policies and retail competition [J]. Marketing Science, 1997, 16(1): 81-94.

[35] Tsay A. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives [J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(10): 1339-1358.

[36] Ding Ding, Chen Jian. Coordinating a three level supply chain with flexible return policies [J]. Omega, 2008, 36(5): 865-876.

[37] Arcelus F J, Kumar S, Srinivasan G.Evaluating manufacturer's buyback policies in a single-period two-echelon framework under price-dependent stochastic demand [J]. Omega, 2008, 36(5): 808-824.

[38] Chen Jing, Bellb C P. Coordinating a decentralized supply chain with customer returns and price-dependent stochastic demand using a buyback policy [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212(2):293-300.

[39] Rockafler T, Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distribution [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2002, 26(17): 1443-1471.

[40] Muth J F. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements [J]. Econometrica, 1961, 29(3): 315-335

顾客策略行为下基于CVaR和回购契约的供应链决策模型

Decision Models for Supply Chain Based on CVaR and Buyback Contract under Strategic Consumer Behavior

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	黄苒,胡丽琴,李梦圆. 专有关系投资、议价力与企业违约风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 11-23.
[2]	李勇,陈元,于辉. 缓解牛鞭效应的新途径：人机协同的智慧决策机器人[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 113-120.
[3]	何浩嘉,艾兴政,唐华,郭松波. 基于链与链竞争的最优专利许可策略选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 142-153.
[4]	张艳芬,徐琪,孙中苗. 供应商竞争下考虑道德风险的平台供应链最优动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 160-170.
[5]	余乐安,王丹萍,曾能民. 突发事件风险下的供应链重构策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 93-100.
[6]	牟宗玉,杨晓霞,李珂,张桂涛. 智慧平台供应链的在线助农模式和融资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 170-181.
[7]	谢楠,何海涛,周艳菊,王宗润. 乡村振兴背景下基于中央政府项目补贴分析的供应链金融决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 214-229.
[8]	李飚,夏西强,李秋月. 碳配额下碳交易对碳减排效应的影响及协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 250-260.
[9]	任廷海,周茂森,曾能民. 软件服务供应链中软件开发商的授权销售与市场入侵策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 117-128.
[10]	孙文婷,彭红军. 电商助农背景下农产品生产与销售策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 181-189.
[11]	陶毅,杨锐思,林强,王帆. 考虑竞争与风险规避行为的电商供应链融资与定价决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 190-200.
[12]	李宗活,李善良,陈祥锋,胡淼. 考虑消费者时间价值的平台供应链即时零售引入策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 225-235.
[13]	王文宾,刘业,全诗苑,钟罗升,吕佳. 双销售渠道闭环供应链的政府补贴模式研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 258-269.
[14]	李进,刘格格,张海霞,张江华. 基于消费者绿色偏好和渠道竞争的制造商分散式入侵策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 281-290.
[15]	潘琳,徐夏静,周荣庭. 博弈视角下社区生鲜食品供应链双渠道动态定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 300-310.