基于非线性分位数回归模型的多期VaR风险测度

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.007

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 56-65.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.007

基于非线性分位数回归模型的多期VaR风险测度

许启发^1,2, 张金秀¹, 蒋翠侠¹

1. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230009;
2. 过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室, 安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2013-06-13 修回日期:2014-01-20 出版日期:2015-03-20 发布日期:2015-03-18
作者简介:许启发(1975-),男(汉族),安徽和县人,合肥工业大学管理学院,教授,博士,研究方向:金融计量、数量经济.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071087,70901048);高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目(200982);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(14YJA790015)

Evaluating Multiperiod VaR via Nonlinear Quantile Regression Model

XU Qi-fa^1,2, ZHANG Jin-xiu¹, JIANG Cui-xia¹

1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2013-06-13 Revised:2014-01-20 Online:2015-03-20 Published:2015-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 多期VaR主要受到持有期及波动率两个变量的影响,并且其影响模式(线性或非线性)的确定对于准确地进行VaR风险测度至关重要。非线性分位数回归模型,能够克服线性分位数回归模型只能揭示多期VaR及其影响因素之间线性依赖关系的局限,从而提高多期VaR风险测度的准确性。结合波动模型与两个非线性分位数回归方法:QRNN和SVQR,给出了多期VaR风险测度的三类方案:波动模型法、QRNN+波动模型法、SVQR+波动模型法。选取3个股票价格指数作为研究对象,考虑了6种不同形式的波动模型,得到了18个多期VaR风险测度方法进行实证比较,结果表明:波动模型选择影响到多期VaR风险测度效果;SVQR+波动模型法略优于QRNN+波动模型法,并且两者显著优于波动模型法。

关键词: 分位数回归, 多期VaR, 非线性, 神经网络, 支持向量机

Abstract: The stylized facts of financial markets, such as volatility clustering, fat tail and asymmetry, make the multiperiod VaR do not comply with simple "rule of time root" in one period VaR measure. Therefore, a more reasonable method is need to seek to evaluate multiperiod VaR accurately. Multiperiod VaR is mainly influenced by two variables, i.e. holding period and volatility. To determine the impact model (linear or nonlinear) of the two variables is essential for evaluating VaR accurately. Nonlinear quantile regression model, overcoming the limitations of the linear quantile regression model in describing linear dependence between multiperiod VaR and its influencing factors, can be used to improve the accuracy of VaR. Three types of methods, volatility model, QRNN+volatility model, and SVQR+volatility model, for evaluating multiperiod VaR has been proposed in this paper based on volatility modeling and nonlinear quantile regression method. For empirical application, three stock price indices are selected: Shenzhen Composite Index, Hang Seng Index and S&P 500 from 19 Jan. 2011 to 28 Sep. 2012. Six different volatility models are considered and two types of nonlinear quantile regression models are combined with them. As a result, the 18 kinds of methods in multiperiod VaR measure are compared together. The empirical results show that volatility model has an influence on the effect of multiperiod VaR measure. In terms of the accuracy of VaR measure, the SVQR+volatility model is slightly better than QRNN+volatility model, and both of them are superior to the volatility model. The good performance of the nonlinear quantile regression models in VaR evaluation comes from the fact that the QRNN and SVQR models belong to nonparametric methods. They have the ability to discover a complex nonlinear relationship among variables without specifying a explicit functional form. This property is very useful for exploring the unknown relation among financial variables.

Key words: quantile regression, multiperiod VaR, nonlinear, neural network, support vector machine

中图分类号:

F224.0

许启发, 张金秀, 蒋翠侠. 基于非线性分位数回归模型的多期VaR风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3): 56-65.

XU Qi-fa, ZHANG Jin-xiu, JIANG Cui-xia. Evaluating Multiperiod VaR via Nonlinear Quantile Regression Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(3): 56-65.

参考文献

[1] Jorion P. Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2007.

[2] Morgan J, Riskmetrics: Technical document. Working Paper, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, 1996.

[3] Koenker R, Bassett G W. Regression quantiles[J]. Econometrica, 1978, 46(1): 33-50.

[4] Taylor J W. Using exponentially weighted quantile regression to estimate value at risk and expected shortfall[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2008, 6(3): 382-406.

[5] 张瑞锋, 张世英, 唐勇. 金融市场波动溢出分析及实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, 14(5): 14-22.

[6] 史金凤, 刘维奇, 杨威. 基于分位数回归的金融市场稳定性检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(2): 24-29.

[7] 许启发, 蒋翠侠. 分位数局部调整模型及应用[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011, 28(8): 115-133.

[8] 陈磊, 曾勇, 杜化宇. 石油期货收益率的分位数建模及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(3): 35-40.

[9] Taylor J W. A quantile regression approach to estimating the distribution of multiperiod returns[J]. Journal of Derivatives, 1999, 7(1): 64-78.

[10] Taylor J W. A quantile regression neural network approach to estimating the conditional density of multiperiod returns[J]. Journal of Forecasting, 2000, 19(4): 299-311.

[11] White H. Nonparametric estimation of conditional quantiles using neural networks[M]. New York: Computing Science and Statistics, 1992.

[12] Feng Yijia, Li Runze, Sudjianto A, et al. Robust neural network with applications to credit portfolio data analysis[J]. Statistics and its interface, 2010, 3(4): 437-444.

[13] Cannon A J. Quantile regression neural networks: Implementation in R and application to precipitation downscaling[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2011, 37(9): 1277-1284.

[14] Cannon A J. Neural networks for probabilistic environmental prediction: Conditional density estimation network creation and evaluation (CaDENCE) in R[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2012, 41(4): 126-135.

[15] Takeuchi I, Furuhashi T. Non-crossing quantile regressions by SVM. Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Budapest,Hungary,July 25-29,2004.

[16] Li Youjuan, Liu Yufeng, Zhu Ji. Quantile regression in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2007, 102(477): 255-268.

[17] Shim J, Kim Y, Lee J, et al. Estimating value at risk with semiparametric support vector quantile regression[J]. Computational Statistics, 2012, 27(4): 685-700.

[18] Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 31(3): 307-327.

[19] Vapnik V N. The nature of statistical learning theory[M]. New York: Springer, 1995.

[20] Huber P J. Robust estimation of a location parameter[J]. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1964, 35(1): 73-101.

[21] Yuan Ming. GACV for quantile smoothing splines[J]. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2006, 50(3): 813-829.

[22] Chen Meiyuan, Chen J E. Application of quantile regression to estimation of value at risk. Working Paper, National Chung-Cheng University, 2002.

[23] 王鹏, 魏宇. 中国燃油期货市场的 VaR 与 ES 风险度量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(6): 1-8.

[24] Kupiec P. Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models[J]. Journal of Derivatives, 1995, 3(2): 73-84.

[25] Christoffersen P F. Evaluating interval forecasts[J]. International Economic Review, 1998, 39(4): 841-862.

基于非线性分位数回归模型的多期VaR风险测度

Evaluating Multiperiod VaR via Nonlinear Quantile Regression Model

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	于孝建,刘国鹏,刘建林,肖炜麟. 基于LSTM网络和文本情感分析的股票指数预测[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 25-35.
[2]	陈耸,于秀运,邱涌钦,方匡南. 基于半监督支持向量机的信用评分模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 1-8.
[3]	严雨婷,毕文杰. 基于XGBoost算法的数据驱动单周期报童问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 260-267.
[4]	王江涛,蔡雅,郑承利. 一类自适应的风险预测算法及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 1-8.
[5]	马勇,刘晓君,胡荣才. 通胀预期、通胀预测误差与股票收益的非线性动态效应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 61-70.
[6]	张莉莉, 杨文文, 罗冠聪. 面向时间优化的“任务-人员”匹配逆最优值方法：以石化设备抢修为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(6): 276-286.
[7]	李德昌, 杨华龙, 宋巍, 郑建风. 考虑船舶速度偏差的集装箱班轮运输货运收益鲁棒优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(4): 151-160.
[8]	高明, 刘超, 唐加福, 孙思晶, 邹广宇. 基于注意力神经网络的燃料电池寿命衰减预测[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(3): 155-166.
[9]	戢守峰, 刘红玉, 赵鹏云, 戢婷婷. 基于PI的企业动态库存补货模型与算法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(2): 205-214.
[10]	刘世峰,康来松,宫大庆. 面向群组的事件兴趣点推荐算法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 301-310.
[11]	贺俊, 韩汶衍, 毕功兵. 直接融资结构对经济发展的非线性影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 47-55.
[12]	董乾东, 李敏. 考虑不同碳排放处理模式的动态供应商选择及采购批量问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 106-116.
[13]	杨莲, 石宝峰. 基于Focal Loss修正交叉熵损失函数的信用风险评价模型及实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 65-75.
[14]	赵为华, 王玲, 程喆, 张日权. 比例数据基于Tobit分位数回归模型的贝叶斯变量选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 63-73.
[15]	张婧, 周怡欣, 胡涵, 卞亦文. 基于知识采纳模型和多层感知机神经网络的评论有用性识别研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 264-274.