考虑销售商风险规避的双边信息不对称的供应链协调

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 非对称信息和风险态度成为影响供应链协调的重要因素,而契约机制设计是实现协调的一种方法。本文在双边成本信息不对称情形下研究供应链契约机制的设计问题。考虑了由一个风险中性的供应商和一个风险规避的销售商组成的二级供应链,供应商和销售商分别拥有私人的生产成本信息和销售成本信息。在分散决策下,供销双方为获得更好的私人利得从而有隐藏信息的动机。为实现信息的真实揭示,文中引入了利他委托人这一概念,从而供应链成为协调主体。借助AGV机制思想,设计了具有激励性质的转移支付,并且基于均值-方差方法建立了非对称信息下的供应链模型。我们发现销售商风规避度在一定范围时,所设计的激励机制能够实现供销双方信息的真实揭示,但并不能完全保证双方的事后非负收益。为解决这一问题,给出一种以期望信息租金比为基础的事后收益分配规则,设计了补偿参数。结合转移支付和补偿参数,提出了一个契约机制。我们发现当销售商风规避度不超过上界k_r时,该机制能真实的揭示信息,并且能够保证供销双方的事后合理的收益分配。此外,当供销双方真实揭示信息时,风险规避度较大的销售商组成的供应链有更低商品交易量和供应链收益。最后,给出数值算例,验证信息揭示的激励有效性并对风险规避度进行敏感性分析。本文的研究将对双边不对称信息下的供应链管理提供一定的理论基础和实践指导。

关键词: 供应链协调, 双边不对称信息, 利他委托人, AGV机制, 风险规避

Abstract: Asymmetric information is an important factor for affecting supply chain coordination, and designing contract mechanism is a method of achieving coordination. The problem of contract mechanism designing under bilateral asymmetric information structure is investigated in this paper. More specifically, a supply chain is considered consisting of one risk-neural supplier and one risk-averse retailer who have their private information regarding the production cost and retail cost, respectively. In a decentralized setting, the supplier and the retailer both have motivations to conceal their private information for better performance. To realize the efficient incentives, the conception of benevolent principal is introduced,thus the whole supply chain can be seen as the coordination subject. By virtue of the idea of the AGV (d' Aspremont and Gerard-Varet) mechanism, the incentive transfer payments is designed and a bilateral asymmetric information model of supply chain using mean-variance (MV) approach is constructed. It is found hat when the retailer's risk aversion degree is in some range, the designed incentive transfer payments based on AGV mechanism can only reveal the private information of two parties truthfully, but can not ensure their ex post nonnegative benefits. In order to overcome this issue, an ex-post allocation rule is presented that associated with the proportion of the expected information rents, and design the corresponding compensation parameters. Combining the transfer payments and the compensation parameters, a contract mechanism is proposed.It shows that the contract mechanism can reveal the private information truthfully and ensure the expost reasonable profits if the retailer's risk aversion degree does not exceed the upper bound k_r. When the supplier and retailer reveal their information truthfully, the supply chain with more risk aversion retailer has lower optimal commodity trading quantity and supply chain performance. Finally, one numerical example is presented to examine the incentive effectiveness for information revealing and analyze the sensitivity of the risk aversion degree.Some theoretical basis and practical guidance for bilateral asymmetric supply chain management will be provided in our research.

Key words: supply chain coordination, bilateral asymmetric information, benevolent principal, AGV mechanism, risk aversion

中图分类号:

F224
O225

王新辉, 汪贤裕. 考虑销售商风险规避的双边信息不对称的供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3): 97-107.

WANG Xin-hui, WANG Xian-yu. The Coordination of Supply Chain with Bilateral Asymmetric Information by Considering Risk Aversion of Retailer[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(3): 97-107.

参考文献

[1] Chatterjee K, Samuelson L.Bargaining with two-sided incomplete information: An infinite horizon model with alternating offers[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1987, 54(2): 175-192.

[2] Babaioff M, Walsh W E. Incentive-compatible, budget-balanced, yet highly efficient auctions for supply chain formation[J].Decision Support Systems, 2005, 39(1): 123-149.

[3] 姚珣, 唐小我, 潘景铭. 基于双向拍卖机制的供应链回购契约研究[J]. 管理学报, 2009, 6(11): 1444-1448.

[4] Zhang Qinhong, Luo Jianwen. Coordination of supply chain with trade credit under bilateral information asymmetry[J]. Systems Engineering -Theory & Practice, 2009, 29(9): 32-40.

[5] Esmaeili M, Zeephongsekul P.Seller-buyer models of supply chain management with an asymmetric information structure[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 123(1): 146-154.

[6] 马俊, 张杰, 汪寿阳. 应用拍卖机制协调供应链[J]. 管理科学学报, 2009, 12(5): 1-9.

[7] 叶飞, 李怡娜. 具有风险规避者加盟的供应链协作回购契约机制研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2006, 11(2): 1-4.

[8] Xiao Tiaojun, Yang Danqin. Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 114(1): 187-200.

[9] Ma Lijun, Liu Fangmei, Li Sijie, et al. Channel bargaining with risk-averse retailer[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 139(1):155-167.

[10] Xiao Tiaojun, Choi T M. Purchasing choices and channel structure strategies for a two-echelon system with risk-averse players[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 120(1): 54-65.

[11] Tsay A A. Risk sensitivity in distribution channel partnerships: Implications for manufacturer return policies[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2002, 78(2): 147-160.

[12] Gan Xianghua, Sethi S P, Yan Houmin. Channel coordination with a risk neutral supplier and a downside risk-averse retailer[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2005, 14(1): 80-89.

[13] 索寒生, 储洪胜, 金以慧. 带有风险规避型销售商的供需链协调[J]. 控制与决策, 2004, 19(9): 1042-1049.

[14] Wei Ying, Choi T M. Mean-variance analysis of supply chains under wholesale pricing and profit sharing schemes. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 204(2): 255-262.

[15] Chiu C H, Choi T M, Li Xun. Supply chain coordination with risk sensitive retailer under target sales rebate[J]. Automatica, 2011, 47(8): 1617-1625.

[16] Chen Xin, Sim M, Simchi-Levi D, et al. Risk aversion in inventory management[J]. Operations Research, 2007, 55(5): 828-842.

[17] Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Game Theory[M]. Massachusetts London,England: The MIT Press Cambridge, 2005.

[18] Nagurney A, Cruz J, Dong J, et al. Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 164(1): 120-142.

[19] Lam S W, Tang L C. Multiobjective vendor allocation in multiechelon inventory systems: a spreadsheet model[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2006, 57(5): 561-578.

[20] 张欢, 汪贤裕. 虚拟第三方控制下供应链对突发事件的协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010,18(1): 66-71.

[21] 张欢, 汪贤裕. 虚拟第三方控制下的供应链逆向选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(5): 91-97.

[22] Laffont J J, Martimort D. The theory of incentives[M]. Princeton: Princeton Press, 2001.

[23] Vickey M. Counterspectulation auctions and competitive sealed tenders[J]. Journal of Finance, 1961, 16(1): 8-37.

[24] d' Aspremont C, Gerard-Varet LA. Incentives and incomplete information[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1979, 11(1): 25-45.

[25] Arrow K. The property rights doctrine and demand revelation under incomplete information[M]//Boskin M J. Economics and Human Welfare, New York:Academic press, 1979.

[26] 蔡建湖, 韩毅, 周根贵, 等. 基于承诺契约的两级供应链库存决策模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(10): 1879-1891.

[27] Agrawal V, Seshadri S. Risk intermediation in supply chains[J]. IIE Transactions, 2000, 32 (9): 819-831.

[28] Gan Xianghua, Sethi S, Yan Houmin. Channel coordination with a risk neutral supplier and a downside risk-averse retailer[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2005, 14(1): 80-89.

[29] Lee J Y, Schwarz L B. Lead time reduction in a (Q, r) inventory system: An agency perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, 105(1): 204-212.

[30] Bolton P, Dewatripont M. Contract Theory[M]. England: The MIT Press Cambridge, 2005.