基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.011

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 82-88.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.011

基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调

梁昌勇¹, 叶春森^1,2

1. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230009;
2. 安徽大学商学院, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2013-06-24 修回日期:2014-03-27 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-05-20
作者简介:梁昌勇(1965-),男(汉族),安徽肥西人,合肥工业大学管理学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:管理信息系统、智能决策方法、行为决策等.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(71331002);教育部人文社科项目(12YJC630268)

Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation

LIANG Chang-yong¹, YE Chun-sen^1,2

1. School of Management Hefei University of Technology, Anhui 230009, China;
2. School of Business Administration, Anhui University, Anhui 230601, China

Received:2013-06-24 Revised:2014-03-27 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 云服务的技术研发努力和使用失败赔偿促销是提高云服务采纳率的重要措施。根据努力水平在云服务供应链整合中的作用,提出努力水平对需求、价格之间的不同影响机理,研究基于技术努力成本和赔偿成本分摊机制实现云服务供应链的协调问题。研究结果表明赔偿促销与技术研发努力的分配机制能提高供应链的整体利润;随努力水平作用于价格、需求的机理不同,努力成本分摊和赔偿成本分摊机制的协调范围、条件和能力也不同,其结果为均衡技术研发努力和使用失败赔偿促销两种措施提供决策支撑。最后通过算例展示模型的有效性。

关键词: SaaS-PaaS, 努力成本, 赔偿机制, 供应链协调

Abstract: Efforts in cloud service technology research and development and compensation from failure applications are two key count-measures in order to improve the rate of adoption of cloud service in client market. The interactive mechanism between effort, demand and price is proposed according to the role of theirs in integrating cloud service supply chain in this paper, and the coordination of cloud service supply chain is studied based on cost distributions of efforts cost and compensation cost. The research shows that coordination and equilibriums can improve the profits of the whole supply chain and realize Pareto improvement, and different interactive mechanisms have different coordination scopes and conditions based on apportioning parameters of the costs, which can provide some advice for equilibriums making decision of efforts level and compensation promotion. Finally, numerical examples and experiments are applied to illustrate the validity of the proposed method.

Key words: SaaS-PaaS, effort cost, compensation mechanism, supply chain coordination

中图分类号:

F272

梁昌勇, 叶春森. 基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5): 82-88.

LIANG Chang-yong, YE Chun-sen. Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(5): 82-88.

参考文献

[1] Jula A, Sundararajan E,Othman Z. Cloud computing service composition: A systematic literature review[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(8): 3809-3824.

[2] Dha S. From outsourcing to cloud computing: Evolution of IT services[J]. Management Research Review, 2012, 35(8): 664-675.

[3] 冯芷艳,郭迅华,曾大军,等.大数据背景下商务管理研究若干前言课题[J].管理科学学报,2013,16(1):1-9.

[4] Gonçalves V, Ballon P. Adding value to the network: Mobile operators' experiments with software-as-a-service and platform-as-a-service models[J]. Telemetric and Informatics, 2011, 28(1):12-21.

[5] Lee S G,Chae S G. Drivers and inhibitors of SaaS adoption in Korea[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2013, 33(3): 429-440.

[6] Demirkan H, Delen D. Leveraging the capabilities of service-oriented decision support systems: Putting analytics and big data in cloud[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 55(1): 412-421.

[7] Fan Ming, Kumar S, Andrew B. Short-term and long-term competition between providers of shrink-wrap software and software as a service[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009,196 (2):661-671.

[8] Benlian A, Marios K. Service quality in software-as-a-Service: Developing the SaaS quality measure and examining its role in usage continuance[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2011, 28(3): 85-126.

[9] Dorsch C, Häcke B. Combining models of capacity supply to handle volatile demand: The economic impact of surplus capacity in cloud service environments[J].Decision Support Systems, 2014, 58:3-14.

[10] Demirkan H, Cheng H K. The risk and information sharing of application service supply chain[J].European Journal of Operation Research, 2008, 187(2):756-784.

[11] Demirkan H, Cheng H K, Bandy S. Coordination strategies in a SaaS supply chain[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2010, 26(4):119-143.

[12] 郑惠莉,达庆利.移动互联网供应链协调机制研究[J].管理科学学报, 2005, 8(5):31-37.

[13] 但斌,宋寒,张旭梅.服务外包中双边道德风险的关系契约机理机制[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(11):1944-1953.

[14] 任怀飞,张旭梅.ASP模式下关键业务应用服务外包中的激励契约研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(11):68-75.

[15] 李新明,廖貅武,刘洋.基于SaaS模式的服务供应链协调研究[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2):98-106.

[16] Tsao Y, Sheen G. Effects of promotion cost sharing policy with the sales learning curve on supply chain coordination[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2012, 39(8):1872-1878.

[17] Taylor T A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects[J].management science, 2002, 48(8):992-1007.

[18] Ali S, Schneider S. Viewpoint cloud services certification[J]. Communications of the COM, 2013, 56(2):33-37.

基于努力和赔偿成本分摊机制的云服务供应链协调

Research on Coordinating Cloud Service Supply Chain Based on the Apportioning Mechanism of the Cost of Effort and Compensation

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	丁军飞,陈伟达,付帅帅. 再制造环境下基于碳期权合约的供应链定价与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 95-104.
[2]	马雪丽,赵颖,柏庆国,薄洪光. 考虑保鲜努力与碳减排努力的生鲜品三级冷链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 52-61.
[3]	代建生, 李玲. 损失规避和资金约束下考虑促销的供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 183-193.
[4]	耿心宇, 秦开大. 基于多物品委托拍卖的供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(5): 260-268.
[5]	邱若臻, 吴旭, 孙月, 朱珠. 不确定需求下考虑大数据投资决策的供应链鲁棒优化及协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 128-141.
[6]	代建生, 刘悦. 公平偏好和销售努力下供应链期权契约协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 20-30.
[7]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 周琨. 期权契约机制下应急物资储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(12): 338-351.
[8]	王玉燕, 苏梅, 王晓迪. 政府奖励机制下闭环供应链的利他关切性决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11): 105-116.
[9]	王旭坪, 樊文平, 阮俊虎, 孙自来. 考虑纵向持股的现代农业供应链运营决策与协调优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 165-176.
[10]	罗岭. 库存成本变化的VMI供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 187-197.
[11]	曹裕, 易超群, 万光羽. 碳税政策下随机双渠道库存与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 111-123.
[12]	樊相宇, 胡博雅, 武小平. 考虑无缺陷退货下零售商转运的供应链回购契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 139-147.
[13]	王永明, 余小华, 尹红丽. 基于风险规避和公平偏好的供应链收益共享契约协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 148-159.
[14]	崔春岳, 张令荣, 杨子凡, 王健. 碳配额交易政策下基于收益共享契约的两阶段供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 214-226.
[15]	胡玉凤, 丁友强, 孙元欣. 平台模式下农民合作社与供应链协调研究——以农户主导视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 88-96.