组内竞争与组间竞争对企业绩效的影响差异——基于移动壁垒分隔作用的研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.016

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 125-133.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.05.016

组内竞争与组间竞争对企业绩效的影响差异——基于移动壁垒分隔作用的研究

段霄, 金占明

清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2013-06-21 修回日期:2014-03-19 出版日期:2015-05-20 发布日期:2015-05-20
作者简介:段霄(1982-),男(汉族),河北邯郸人,清华大学经济管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:企业战略管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172003)

Opposite Effects of Intra-group and Inter-group Rivalries: A Study Based on the Partitioning Effects of Mobility Barriers

DUAN Xiao, JIN Zhan-ming

School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2013-06-21 Revised:2014-03-19 Online:2015-05-20 Published:2015-05-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文基于战略群组理论,通过实证研究探索了组内竞争、组间竞争对移动壁垒内外部企业具有的不同影响。以中国制药业上市公司为样本,采用阶层聚类分析中的Ward法进行战略群组划分,识别行业中的移动壁垒并将其保护功能作为调节变量,然后分别使用POLS和RE回归模型对两类竞争的效果进行了分析检验。研究发现,组内竞争对于移动壁垒外部企业绩效的不利影响显著大于其对壁垒内部企业的影响;相反,组间竞争对移动壁垒内部企业绩效的不利影响显著大于其对壁垒外部企业的影响。上述发现表明,行业中不同类型竞争的效果存在显著差异,而企业相对于移动壁垒的位置是造成上述差异的重要原因。对竞争效果的准确分析需把握以下两方面因素:行业中有哪些移动壁垒,以及竞争发生在组内还是组间。

关键词: 战略群组, 移动壁垒, 组内竞争, 组间竞争, 企业绩效

Abstract: This paper focuses on the question of whether intra-group and inter-group rivalries have different performance impacts on firms partitioned by mobility barriers. The sample contains listed companies in the pharmaceutical industry of China over the period of 2010 to 2011. Data were mainly acquired from CSMAR and RESSET databases and annual reports of those companies. Grouping variables were selected according to strategic group research in pharmaceutical industry. The companies were clustered into four strategic groups aided by SAS software with Ward method, and then mobility barriers were identified.POLS and RE models were used to examine the effects of intra-group and inter-group rivalries in the panel data regressions, where the protection of mobility barriers is the moderating variable. Results show that intra-group rivalry has a stronger adverse impact on firms outside mobility barriers than on firms inside mobility barriers, whereas inter-group rivalry has a stronger adverse impact on firms inside mobility barriers than on firms outside mobility barriers. These findings indicate that rivalries within and between strategic groups have different influences on firm performance. Our findings also suggest that firm studies should take into consideration the strategic group structure and mobility barriers, and the effects of intra-group and inter-group rivalries should be analyzed separately rather than jointly.

Key words: strategic groups, mobility barriers, intra-group rivalry, inter-group rivalry, firm performance

中图分类号:

F272
C93

段霄, 金占明. 组内竞争与组间竞争对企业绩效的影响差异——基于移动壁垒分隔作用的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5): 125-133.

DUAN Xiao, JIN Zhan-ming. Opposite Effects of Intra-group and Inter-group Rivalries: A Study Based on the Partitioning Effects of Mobility Barriers[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(5): 125-133.

参考文献

[1] Melicher R W, Rush D F, Winn D N. Industry concentration, financial structure and profitability[J]. Financial Management, 1976, 5(3): 48-53.

[2] Porter M E. Competitive strategy[M]. New York: Free Press, 1980.

[3] Cool K, Dierickx I. Rivalry, strategic groups and firm profitability[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(1): 47-59.

[4] Peteraf M A. Intra-industry structure and response toward rivals[J]. Journal of Managerial and Decision Econimics, 1993, 14(6): 519-528.

[5] Chen M J, Hambrick D C. Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(2): 453-482.

[6] Caves R E, Porter M E. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1977, 91(2): 241-262.

[7] Reger R K, Huff A S. Strategicgroups: A cognitive perspective[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(2): 103-123.

[8] Cool K O, Schendel D. Strategic group formation and performance: The case of the U.S. pharmaceutical industry, 1963-1982[J]. Management Science, 1987, 33(9): 1102-1124.

[9] Porter M E. The structure within industries and companies' performance[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979, 61(2): 214-227.

[10] Mascarenhas B, Aaker D A. Mobility barriers and strategic groups[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(5): 475-485.

[11] Fiegenbaum A, Thomas H. Strategic groups and performance: The U.S. insurance industry, 1970-84[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 11(3): 197-215.

[12] Nair A, Kotha S. Does group membership matter: Evidence from the Japanese steel industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(3): 221-235.

[13] 孙先定,杨锡怀,李颖.基于企业价值的我国家电上市公司的战略集团与绩效关系研究[J].中国管理科学,2002,10(3): 77-81.

[14] 倪文斌,田也壮,姜振寰,等.中日制造企业制造战略分类研究[J].管理工程学报,2003,17(4): 19-22.

[15] 杨鑫,金占明.战略群组的存在性及其对企业绩效的影响——基于中国上市公司的研究[J].中国软科学,2010,(7): 112-124.

[16] McGee J, Thomas H. Strategic groups: Theory, research and taxonomy. Strategic Management Journal[J]. 1986, 7(2): 141-160.

[17] Mehra A, Floyd S W. Product market heterogeneity, resource imitability and strategic group formation[J]. Journal of Management, 1998, 24(4): 511-531.

[18] 郭朝阳.策略群组与企业盈利水平的差异[J].中国工业经济,2002,(6): 86-94.

[19] Guedri Z, McGuire J. Multimarket competition, mobility barriers, and firm performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(4): 857-890.

[20] Bogner W C, Thomas H, McGee J. A longitudinal study of the competitive positions and entry paths of European firms in the U.S. pharmaceutical market[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(2): 85-107.

[21] Leask G, Parker D. Strategic groups, competitive groups and performance within the U.K. pharmaceutical industry: Improving our understanding of the competitive process[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(7): 723-745.

[22] Short J C, Ketchen. D J, Palmer T B, et al. Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(2): 147-167.

[23] Houthoofd N, Heene A. Strategic groups as subsets of strategic scope groups in the Belgian brewing industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(8): 653-666.

[24] Porac J F, Thomas H, Wilson F, et al. Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40(2): 203-227.

[25] Galbreath J, Galvin P. Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2008, 61(2): 109-117.

[26] Kumar N. Mobility barriers and profitability of multinational and local enterprises in Indian manufacturing[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1990, 38(4):449-463.

组内竞争与组间竞争对企业绩效的影响差异——基于移动壁垒分隔作用的研究

Opposite Effects of Intra-group and Inter-group Rivalries: A Study Based on the Partitioning Effects of Mobility Barriers

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	万光羽,蒲霏嫣,李紫纯,曹裕. 企业营销能力与生产运营能力交互作用及其对绩效影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 275-285.
[2]	段霄, 武常岐. 战略维度间的匹配关系与企业战略定位选择——基于战略群组理论视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 178-189.
[3]	王可, 周亚拿. 信息化建设、供应链信息分享与企业绩效——基于中国制造业企业的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 34-43.
[4]	张徽燕, 姚秦, 吴继红, 何楠. 高绩效工作系统、组织学习能力与企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5): 134-142.
[5]	李卫宁, 张祎宁. 新任CEO特征、管理团队调整与企业绩效——基于ST上市公司的数据实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(8): 47-55.
[6]	刘戌峰, 艾时钟. IT外包中企业绩效的影响因素实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(2): 142-148.
[7]	田立法. 人力资源管理系统影响企业绩效的复杂性机理——基于高新技术企业的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(12): 109-117.
[8]	雷辉, 欧阳丽萍, 聂珊珊, 陈收. 生物药品制造行业竞争战略影响企业绩效的时滞效应研究——基于VAR模型的脉冲响应分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 140-148.
[9]	黎传国, 陈收, 毛超, 刘端. 资源配置视角下战略调整测度及其对绩效的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 19-26.
[10]	黎传国, 陈收, 毛超, 刘端. 资源配置视角下战略调整测度及其对绩效的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 19-26.
[11]	李龙振, 刘国山. 在华韩资企业战略性人力资源管理的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(2): 172-180.
[12]	刘善仕, 周巧笑, 黄同圳, 刘学. 企业战略、人力资源管理系统与企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(3): 181-192.
[13]	金立印. 服务供应链管理、顾客满意与企业绩效[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, (2): 100-106.
[14]	王龙伟, 王刊良, 李垣. 关系激励管理对供求企业绩效影响的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (4): 85-90.
[15]	孙先定, 杨锡怀, 李颖. 基于企业价值的我国家电上市公司的战略集团与绩效关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (3): 77-81.