基于历史排放参照的碳配额分配机制研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.201.06.009

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 65-72.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.201.06.009

基于历史排放参照的碳配额分配机制研究

令狐大智^1,2, 叶飞¹

1. 华南理工大学工商管理学院, 广东广州 510640;
2. 广西大学商学院, 广西南宁 530004

收稿日期:2014-07-25 修回日期:2015-01-02 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-07-22
作者简介:令狐大智(1979-),男(汉族),山西运城人,广西大学商学院副教授,华南理工大学工商学院博士,研究方向:物流与供应链管理研究.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172075, 71090403);教育部高校博士点基金项目(20130172110029);教育部新世纪项目(NECT-13-0219)

Quota Allocation Mechanism based on Historical Emissions of Carbon

LINGHU Da-zhi^1,2, YE Fei¹

1. School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China;
2. School of Business, Guxangxi University, Nanning 530004, China

Received:2014-07-25 Revised:2015-01-02 Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将行业内企业按单位产品碳排放水平分为高排企业和低排企业两类,并将"共同但有区别的责任原则"引入行业内部,构建基于双寡头竞争市场的碳配额分配策略。通过建立基于分配策略的古诺模型,研究减排目标、分配策略和单位产品碳排放水平对企业的利润差、产量和碳排放的影响。研究结果表明,减排策略对单位产品碳排放水平具有较强的敏感性;当行业中的企业存在单位产品碳排放水平差异时,对低排企业宽松的碳配额分配策略具有更强的减排激励效用,利于企业主动实施低碳技术改造;阶段式递进减排机制对"共同但有区别责任原则"在行业内应用,企业低碳技术改造的激励效用以及减排政策的稳步推进有积极的作用;同时研究表明准确核实企业单位产品碳排放水平的重要性。

关键词: 碳配额分配, 基准排量, 历史排放, 双寡头竞争

Abstract: According to the current realities of industry and the target of carbon reduction,companies are classified into two categories: high and low ranked by the carbon emission per unit item and introduce' the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities'. Considering history of carbon emissions and incentive by profit margins, a carbon quota allocation policy is present. Based on the allocation policy, a Cournot duopoly model is employed to study the influences on the two categories of reduction targets, quota allocation policy and carbon emission per unit item. The result shows that the quota allocation policy has a positive sensitivity on carbon emission per unit item; generous allocation focusing on low-ranked has a stronger incentive utility on those companies. Moreover, progressive-stage reduction mechanism has a positive effect on both incentive utility of implement a low-carbon and steady implementation of policies. The study highlights the importance of verification on the carbon emissions and also extends the perspectives of research and mechanism design on carbon reduction and will contributes to carbon reduction in China.

Key words: carbon quota allocation, baseline emissions, historical emissions, duopoly competition

中图分类号:

F272
O225

令狐大智, 叶飞. 基于历史排放参照的碳配额分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 65-72.

LINGHU Da-zhi, YE Fei. Quota Allocation Mechanism based on Historical Emissions of Carbon[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(6): 65-72.

参考文献

[1] 张梓太,沈灏.气候变化国际立法最新进展与中国立法展望[J].南京大学学报:哲学.人文科学.社会科学,2014,51(2):37-43.

[2] 高翔,牛晨.美国气候变化立法进展及启示[J].美国研究,2010,(3):39-51.

[3] 鲍勤,汤铃,汪寿阳,等.美国碳关税对我国经济的影响程度到底如何?基于DCGE模型的分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(2):345-353.

[4] Elzen D M, Lucas P,Vuuren D.Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes[J].Energy Policy, 2005,33(16):2138-2151.

[5] Boehringer C,Koschel H,Moslener U.Efficiency losses from overlapping regulation of EU carbon emissions[J].Journal of Regulatory Economics,2008,33(3):299-317.

[6] Subramanian R,Gupta S,Talbot B.Compliance strategies under permits for emissions [J].Production and Operations Management, 2007,16(6):763-779.

[7] Van Steenberghe V.Core stable and equitable allocations of greenhouse gas emission permits[R].Discussion Paper,Belgian Federal Ministry for Environment,2004.

[8] Zheng Wei,Chen Rongda.The setting of initial allocation approaches of carbon emission per-mits[C].Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (BIFE),Wuhan,China,October 17-20,2011.

[9] Groenenberg H,Blok K.Benchmark based emission all ocation in a cap-and-trade system[J]. Climate Policy,2002,2(1):105-109.

[10] 丁丁,冯静茹.论我国碳交易配额分配方式的选择[J].国际商务:对外经济贸易大学学报,2013,(4):83-92.

[11] 张志耀,张海明.污染物排放总量分配的群体决策方法研究[J].系统科学与数学, 2001,21(4):473-479.

[12] Kling C L, Zhao Jinhua.On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs. free permits[J].Economics Let-ters,2000,69(2):235-238.

[13] 吴亚琼,赵勇,吴相林,等.初始排污权分配的协商仲裁机制[J].系统工程,2003,21(5):70-74.

[14] Ramudhin A,Chaabane A,Kharoune M,et al. Carbon market sensitive green supply chain network design[C].Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,Singapore,December 8-11,2008.

[15] 杨珺,卢巍.低碳政策下多容量等级选址与配送问题研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(5):51-60.

[16] 黄守军,任玉珑,孙睿,等.双寡头电力市场垂直合作减排的随机微分对策模型[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(2):101-111.

[17] 杜少甫, 董骏峰,梁樑,等.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86.

[18] 慕银平,李韵雅.寡头竞争企业的最优产量及碳排放量联合决策[J].系统工程学报,2014,29(1):1-7.

基于历史排放参照的碳配额分配机制研究

Quota Allocation Mechanism based on Historical Emissions of Carbon

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	李锋,王倩妮. 双寡头竞争环境下迭代产品上市时间和定价问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 240-254.
[2]	冯青, 吴志彬, 徐玖平. 基于投入产出规模的省际碳排放配额分配研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(3): 268-276.
[3]	令狐大智, 武新丽, 叶飞. 考虑双重异质性的碳配额分配及交易机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 176-187.
[4]	夏晖, 王思逸, 蔡强. 多目标条件下企业碳配额分配和政府公平——基于(p,α)比例公平的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 48-55.
[5]	刘靓晨, 翟昕. 竞争环境下的以旧换新策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 75-84.
[6]	邓万江, 马士华, 关旭. 碳交易背景下存在顾客环保偏好的双企业竞争策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 17-26.