主管：中国科学院
主办：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
　　　中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
中国管理科学

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (7): 68-76.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.009

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同政府决策目标下逆向供应链的奖惩机制研究

王文宾1, 张雨1, 范玲玲1, 何凌云1, 达庆利2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学管理学院, 江苏 徐州 221116;
    2. 东南大学经济管理学院, 江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-10 修回日期:2014-02-07 出版日期:2015-07-20 发布日期:2015-07-22
  • 作者简介:王文宾(1979-),男(汉族),山东诸城人,中国矿业大学管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:逆向物流、闭环供应链管理.
  • 基金资助:

    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2013W02);四川循环经济研究中心重点项目(XHJJ-1508)

Research on the Premium and Penalty Mechanism of the Reverse Supply Chain Considering Various Goals of Government

WANG Wen-bin1, ZHANG Yu1, FAN Ling-ling1, HE Ling-yun1, DA Qing-li2   

  1. 1. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
  • Received:2013-01-10 Revised:2014-02-07 Online:2015-07-20 Published:2015-07-22

PDF (PC)

2085

被引次数

13

摘要： 考虑政府的三种决策目标,研究了逆向供应链的政府奖惩机制设计问题。分别建立了有无奖惩机制下的逆向供应链博弈模型,得到了政府奖惩力度的均衡解,并对求解结果进行比较,讨论了管理意义,最后通过算例验证了模型的结论并进一步仿真分析了外生变量对决策变量影响。研究表明:政府奖惩机制不仅能够提高废旧电器电子产品的回收率,还能降低新产品零售价,提高回购价,有利于全社会福利的提高;奖惩力度随着市场容量的增加而提高,政府应根据制造商产品的市场容量大小制定奖惩力度而不是对所有制造商制定统一的奖惩力度;政府应综合考虑全社会福利和废旧产品回收带来的环境效益,这样能较好地提高逆向供应链的回收率。

关键词: 政府决策目标, 奖惩机制, 逆向供应链, 回收率

Abstract: Considering the government's three decision-making goals, the premium and penalty mechanism of government design problem of the reverse supply chain is discussed in this paper. With and without the premium and penalty mechanism is established under the game model of the reverse supply chain, the equilibrium solution of the government premium and penalty mechanism is gained, and the results are compared to discuss management insights. Finally, the conclusions of the model are verified by examples, and further simulation analysis of the influence of exogenous variables on the decision variables is also listed. The study has shown that: the government premium and penalty mechanism can not only improve the recovery rate of waste electrical and electronic products, but also reduce the retail price of new products, improve the repurchase price, which is conducive to the improvement of the welfare of the whole society; premium and penalty efforts are increased with the increase of market capacity, the government should consider the market size of the products of the manufacturer while implementing the premium and penalty mechanism to develop premium and penalty intensity rather than to formulate a unified incentive intensity of all manufacturers.It would be better to improve the recovery rate of the reverse supply chain that the government considering the welfare of the whole society and the environmental effects brought by the collection of waste electrical and electronic products.

Key words: government's decision-making goal, premium and penalty mechanism, reverse supply chain, collection rate

中图分类号: