粘性信息、通货膨胀惯性与货币政策效应——兼论宏观经济变量的共变性

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.08.003

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (8): 18-28.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.08.003

粘性信息、通货膨胀惯性与货币政策效应——兼论宏观经济变量的共变性

崔百胜

上海师范大学金融工程研究中心, 上海 200234

收稿日期:2014-01-15 修回日期:2014-09-02 出版日期:2015-08-20 发布日期:2015-08-19
作者简介:崔百胜(1975-),男(汉族),安徽宿州人,上海师范大学金融工程研究中心副教授,金融学博士,硕士生导师,研究方向:金融经济学、宏观计量经济学.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71471117);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC790020);教育部人文社会科学规划项目(11YJA790107);上海市教委科研创新重点项目(14ZS105)

Sticky Information, Inflation Inertia andthe Effect of Monetary Policy ——And the Co-movement of Macroeconomic Variables

CUI Bai-sheng

Financial Engineering Research Center, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China

Received:2014-01-15 Revised:2014-09-02 Online:2015-08-20 Published:2015-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过构建一个企业获取信息存在粘性的DSGE模型,分析了信息当期宣布和提前宣布或预期到信息两种情况下,发生政府支出和货币供应2种冲击时,宏观经济变量的响应,进而研究主要变量间的共变性与先行滞后关系。结果表明,在基准信息粘性条件下,信息即期宣布,面对政府支出和货币供应冲击,通货膨胀的滞后性存在差异,货币供应冲击发生后的8个季度,通货膨胀达到最大,政府支出6个季度,通货膨胀达到最大,通货膨胀在这2种冲击下均存在惯性。名义利率能够对这2种冲击做出即期反应。信息提前宣布时,通货膨胀和名义利率能够做出即期反应,到信息实现时,在充分吸收信息基础上,反应达到最大,然后呈非连续性快速恢复。从频域和时域角度看,名义利率和通货膨胀2个变量均滞后于实际货币供应,因此,当前可以采用即期增加政府支出的积极财政政策和提前宣布增加货币供应的货币政策相结合的组合政策,达到"稳增长"的目标。

关键词: 粘性信息, 通货膨胀惯性, 货币政策效应, 共变性

Abstract: A DSGE model with sticky information is built and the macroeconomic variables response, where there exist two cases including current announce or announced in advance are analyzed, with the occurrence of two kinds of shocks including government purchase and money supply, and then the co-movement among macroeconomic variables is researched. Under the condition of benchmark information stickiness, the results show that when information announces immediately, inflation's lag structures appear difference, with the face of shocks of government purchase and monetary supply. Inflation reaches its maximum after 8 quarters of the money supply shocks, 6 quarters of the government purchase shocks. Inflation presents inertia in these two kinds of shocks. Nominal interest rate can response these two kinds of shocks immediately. When announced information in advance, inflation and nominal interest rate can make the spot reaction. When information is realized, the reaction reaches the maximum based on the fully absorbing the information, after which it is restored quickly in a non-linear manner. From the frequency domain and time domain perspective, nominal interest rates and inflation are lag the real money supply. Therefore, in order to achieve the goal of "steady growth", a combining policy is adopted, including a proactive fiscal policy by the spot announcement of enlarging government spending and a pre-announced expansion of the money supply in the monetary policy.

Key words: sticky information, inflation inertia, the effect of monetary policy, co-movement

中图分类号:

F830.3

崔百胜. 粘性信息、通货膨胀惯性与货币政策效应——兼论宏观经济变量的共变性[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8): 18-28.

CUI Bai-sheng. Sticky Information, Inflation Inertia andthe Effect of Monetary Policy ——And the Co-movement of Macroeconomic Variables[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(8): 18-28.

参考文献

[1] Calvo G A. Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework [J]. Journal of monetary Economics, 1983, 12(3): 383-398.

[2] Woodford M. Control of the public debt: A requirement for price stability?[R]. Working Paper,National bureau of economic research, 1996.

[3] Galí J. New perspectives on monetary policy, inflation, and the business cycle[R]. Working Paper National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.

[4] Christiano L J, Eichenbaum M, Evans C L. Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy [J]. Journal of political Economy, 2005, 113(1): 1-45.

[5] Mankiw N G, Reis R. Sticky information versus sticky prices: a proposal to replace the New Keynesian Phillips curve[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117(4): 1295-1328.

[6] Mankiw N G, Reis R. Sticky information in general equilibrium [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2007, 5(2-3): 603-613.

[7] Reis R. Inattentive producers [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73(3): 793-821.

[8] Reis R. Inattentive consumers [J]. Journal of monetary Economics, 2006, 53(8): 1761-1800.

[9] Dräger L. Why don't people pay attention? Endogenous Sticky Information in a DSGE Model[R]. Working Papers, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich, 2010.

[10] Knotek E S, A tale of two rigidities: Sticky prices in a sticky-information environment [J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010, 42(8): 1543-1564.

[11] Coibion O. Inflation inertia in sticky information models [J]. Contributions in Macroeconomics, 2006, 6(1): 1-29.

[12] Dupor B, Kitamura T, Tsuruga T. Integrating sticky prices and sticky information [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2010, 92(3): 657-669.

[13] 李彬, 刘凤良. 我国通货膨胀动态和货币政策效果的行为宏观解释[J]. 管理世界, 2007, (3): 23-31.

[14] 王立勇, 张良贵, 刘文革. 不同粘性条件下金融加速器效应的经验研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012,(10): 69-81.

[15] 彭兴韵. 粘性信息经济学——宏观经济学最新发展的一个文献综述[J]. 经济研究, 2012,(12): 138-151.

[16] 王军. 新凯恩斯主义粘性信息理论述评[J]. 管理世界, 2009, (8): 157-162.

[17] 郭航. 最优货币政策研究: 基于粘性信息宏观经济模型的检验[J]. 金融理论与实践, 2012, (9): 40-42.

[18] 刘翏. 粘性信息下最优货币政策研究[D]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学, 2010.

[19] 高宏. 粘性信息, 货币政策与经济波动——基于动态随机一般均衡的数值模拟分析[J]. 上海经济研究, 2013, (10):3-12.

[20] Woodford M, WALSH C E. Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy [J]. 2005,9(287):550-552.

[21] Christensen I, Dib A. The financial accelerator in an estimated New Keynesian model [J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2008, 11(1): 155-178.

[22] 袁申国, 陈平, 刘兰凤. 汇率制度, 金融加速器和经济波动[J]. 经济研究, 2011, (1): 57-70.

[23] Bernanke B S, Gertler M, Gilchrist S. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework [J].Social Science Electronic Publishing, 1999, 1(99): 1341-1393.

[24] Gertler M, Gilchrist S, Natalucci F M. External constraints on monetary policy and the financial accelerator [J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2007, 39(2-3): 295-330.

[25] Gali J, Monacelli T. Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2005, 72(3): 707-734.

[26] 崔光灿. 资产价格, 金融加速器与经济稳定[J]. 世界经济, 2007, 29(11): 59-69.

[27] 陈利锋, 范红忠. 房价波动, 货币政策与中国社会福利损失[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5): 42-50.

[28] Benchimol J. Risk aversion in the Euro area[C]//Proceedings of 29th GdRE Annual International Symposium on Money, Banking and Finance, Nantes,France,June 28-29,2012.

[29] Chari V V, Kehoe P J, McGrattan E R. Sticky price models of the business cycle: Can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem?[J]. Econometrica, 2000, 68(5): 1151-1179.

[30] 常进雄, 王丹枫, 叶正茂. 要素贡献与我国初次分配中的劳动报酬占比[J]. 财经研究, 2011, 37(5): 134-144.

[32] Khan H, Zhu Zhenhua. Estimates of the sticky-information Phillips curve for the United States [J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2006,38(1): 195-207.

粘性信息、通货膨胀惯性与货币政策效应——兼论宏观经济变量的共变性

Sticky Information, Inflation Inertia andthe Effect of Monetary Policy ——And the Co-movement of Macroeconomic Variables

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0