低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.10.007

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10): 57-66.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.10.007

低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析

张汉江^1,2, 张佳雨^1,2, 赖明勇^1,2,3

1. 湖南大学经济与贸易学院, 湖南长沙 410079;
2. 湖南省物流信息与仿真技术重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410079;
3. 长沙理工大学经济管理学院, 湖南长沙 410114

收稿日期:2014-07-01 修回日期:2015-05-25 出版日期:2015-10-20 发布日期:2015-10-24
作者简介:张汉江(1962-),男(汉族),四川人,湖南大学经济与贸易学院教授,博士,研究方向:物流系统工程、供应链管理、产业组织理论.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金国际合作项目(71420107027);湖南省社科基金课题(2012YBA070)

The Game Analysis of the Supply Chain Cooperative R & D and the Government's Behavior under the Low-carbon Background

ZHANG Han-jiang^1,2, ZHANG Jia-yu^1,2, LAI Ming-yong^1,2,3

1. College of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China;
2. Hunan Province Key Laboratory of logistics information and Simulation Technology, Changsha 410079, China;
3. Economics and Management School of Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China

Received:2014-07-01 Revised:2015-05-25 Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了在低碳化背景下,考虑政府征收碳税的纵向供应链最优减排问题。通过建立供应链无减排研发、单独减排研发以及合作减排研发三种模型,采用逆向求解法,首先制造商制定最优减排量,然后供应链参与者决定各自的价格并得到各自的最优利润。通过对均衡结果分析得出,供应链合作研发的最优减排量大于单独研发最优减排量;供应链最优减排量与研发成本系数成负向关系,与分担比例成正向关系。最后用数值分析法证明了,制定合理碳税税率不仅促使最优减排量达到最大值,并且有利于供应链合作减排研发。最后联系实际为政府制定合理碳税税率,以及企业如何实现节能减排供应链协调提出了建议。

关键词: 物流与供应链管理, 低碳减排, 合作研发, 供应链协调, 碳税

Abstract: In the background of low-carbon,study the optimal emission reductions for vertical supply chain with a carbon tax levied by the Government. Through the three models of no reduction of R & D、manufacturer's reduction of R & D alone and cooperation reduction,the converse method is used to solve this problem.By this method,firstly the decision is made by the manufacturer on the optimal emission reductions;then the price of products as set by the supplier and the manufactarer respectively and then their own optimal profits are gained. Through the analysis of equilibrium,It's found that the optimal emission reductions under the supply chain's cooperation R & D is more than that by manufacturer's reduction alone;The optimal emission reductions have a negative relationship with R & D cost coefficient,and a positive relationship with share proportion.At last,a numerical analysis proves that the reasonable carbon tax rates not only maximize the emission reductions, but also is conducive to supply chain's cooperative reductions of R & D.

Key words: logistics and supply chain management, carbon emissions, cooperative research and development, supply chain coordination, carbon tax

中图分类号:

F224.32
F205

张汉江, 张佳雨, 赖明勇. 低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 57-66.

ZHANG Han-jiang, ZHANG Jia-yu, LAI Ming-yong. The Game Analysis of the Supply Chain Cooperative R & D and the Government's Behavior under the Low-carbon Background[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10): 57-66.

参考文献

[1] Lin Boqiang, Li Xuehui.The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO₂ emissions[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(9):5137-5146.

[2] Conefrey T, Gerald J D F, Valeri L M, et al.The impact of a carbon tax on economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Ireland[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2013,56(7):934-952.

[3] Allan G, Lecca P, McGregor P, et al. The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland:A computable general equilibrium analysis[J].Ecological Economics,2014,100:40-50.

[4] Lu Chuanyi, Tong Qing, Liu Xuemei.The impacts of carbon tax and complementary policies on Chinese economy[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(11):7278-7285.

[5] 姚昕,刘希颖.基于增长视角的中国最优碳税研究[J].经济研究,2010,(11):48-58.

[6] 朱永彬,刘晓,王铮.碳税政策的减排效果及其对我国经济的影响分析[J].中国软科学,2010,(4):1-10.

[7] Meng S, Siriwardana M, McNeill J.The environmental and economic impact of the carbon tax in Australia[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2013,54(3):313-332.

[8] Cachon G P.Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions[J].Management Science,2013,60(8):1907-1925.

[9] Lukas E, Welling A.Timing and eco(nomic) efficiency of climate-friendly investments in supply chains[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2014,233(2):448-457.

[10] Martina R, de Preuxa L B, Wagner U J.The impact of a carbon tax on manufacturing:Evidence from microdata[J].Public Economics,2014, 117(9):1-14.

[11] 蔡圣华, 牟敦国, 方梦祥.二氧化碳强度减排目标下我国产业结构优化的驱动力研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(4):167-173.

[12] 李友东,赵道致,谢鑫鹏.考虑消费者低碳偏好的两级供应链博弈分析[J].内蒙古大学学报,2013,45(5):64-69.

[13] 张毅,夏炎.工业化过程中碳排放消费建设比的演变规律研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):159-166.

[14] Servaes H.The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value:The role of customer awareness[J].Management Science,2013,59(5):1045-1061.

[15] Benjaafar S,Li Yanzhi,Daskin M.Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains:Insights from simple models[J].Automation Science and Engineering,2013,10(1):99-116.

[16] 赖苹,曹国华,马文斌.基于节能减排技术研发的企业联盟合作模式选择[J].技术经济,2013,32(12):10-14.

[17] Jaber M Y, Glock C H, Saadany AMAE.Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives[J].International Journal of Production Research, 2013,51(1):69-82.

[18] 黄守军,任玉珑,孙睿,等.基于碳减排调度的激励性厂网合作竞价机制设计[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(5):138-146.

[19] Theiben S, Spinler S.Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships:An ANP model for collaborative CO₂ reduction management[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2014,233(2):383-397.

[20] Tsai W H, Yang C H, Chang J C, et al.An activity-based costing decision model for life cycle assessment in green building projects[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2014,238(2):607-619.

[21] 张汉江,孟园,何酉子.公共财政补贴内生化与闭环供应链的短期均衡结果分析[J].系统工程,2013,31(08):55-59.

[22] 张汉江,李聪颖,姚琴,等.闭环供应链上的最优回收激励契约与政府补贴再制造政策的最优化[J].系统工程,2014,32(8):74-79.

低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析

The Game Analysis of the Supply Chain Cooperative R & D and the Government's Behavior under the Low-carbon Background

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	丁军飞,陈伟达,付帅帅. 再制造环境下基于碳期权合约的供应链定价与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 95-104.
[2]	马雪丽,赵颖,柏庆国,薄洪光. 考虑保鲜努力与碳减排努力的生鲜品三级冷链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 52-61.
[3]	郑月龙, 周冰洁, 白春光, 蔡琴. 双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发微分博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 255-265.
[4]	代建生, 李玲. 损失规避和资金约束下考虑促销的供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 183-193.
[5]	耿心宇, 秦开大. 基于多物品委托拍卖的供应链协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(5): 260-268.
[6]	邱若臻, 吴旭, 孙月, 朱珠. 不确定需求下考虑大数据投资决策的供应链鲁棒优化及协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 128-141.
[7]	夏西强, 李飚. 政府碳税与补贴政策对外包再制造影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 105-115.
[8]	代建生, 刘悦. 公平偏好和销售努力下供应链期权契约协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 20-30.
[9]	刘阳, 田军, 冯耕中, 周琨. 期权契约机制下应急物资储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(12): 338-351.
[10]	王玉燕, 苏梅, 王晓迪. 政府奖励机制下闭环供应链的利他关切性决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11): 105-116.
[11]	王旭坪, 樊文平, 阮俊虎, 孙自来. 考虑纵向持股的现代农业供应链运营决策与协调优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 165-176.
[12]	罗岭. 库存成本变化的VMI供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 187-197.
[13]	曹裕, 易超群, 万光羽. 碳税政策下随机双渠道库存与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 111-123.
[14]	杨玉香, 管倩, 张宝友, 孟丽君, 于艳娜. 碳税政策下闭环供应链网络均衡分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 185-195.
[15]	杨建华, 韩梦莹. 考虑碳税对备件联合订购决策影响的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 23-32.