风险环境下企业信息系统项目控制对绩效的影响机制研究:基于项目经理和用户代表的双重视角

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.10.009

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10): 78-87.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.10.009

风险环境下企业信息系统项目控制对绩效的影响机制研究:基于项目经理和用户代表的双重视角

刘敏¹, 刘汕², 张金隆³

1. 南昌大学经济管理学院, 江西南昌 330000;
2. 武汉大学经济与管理学院, 湖北武汉 430072;
3. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北武汉 430074

收稿日期:2013-06-28 修回日期:2014-03-13 出版日期:2015-10-20 发布日期:2015-10-24
作者简介:刘敏(1982-),女(汉族),江西宜春人,南昌大学经济管理学院,讲师,研究方向:国际经济、项目管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101060,71271095,71471141);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20130141120069);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金武汉大学主自科研项目(人文社会科学);武汉大学351人才计划珞珈青年学者科研启动基金

The Impact of Control on Performance of Enterprise Information Technology Project in the Risk Environment: The View from Project Managers and User Liaisons

LIU Min¹, LIU Shan², ZHANG Jin-long³

1. School of Economics & Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330000, China;
2. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
3. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2013-06-28 Revised:2014-03-13 Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-10-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 虽然当前项目管理水平不断提高,但是企业信息系统项目实施的成功率仍然不容乐观。项目干系人缺乏准确的相互认知和角色定位,以及风险与控制的关系无法有效处理是导致项目绩效偏低的重要原因。为了从不同视角探索风险和控制对企业信息系统项目绩效的共同作用,通过对65位项目经理和63位用户代表所经历的128个项目的调查,利用结构方程模型进行实证分析,并采用层次回归分析技术进行检验。实证结果表明,正式控制和非正式控制对信息系统项目绩效都具有积极的影响,但是项目经理认为正式控制具有更加重要的作用,而用户代表认为非正式控制的作用更为显著。此外,项目经理和用户代表均认为组织风险和技术风险会减弱正式和非正式控制对绩效的有效作用。因此在控制方式的选择和组合上不仅要基于项目自身的特点,而且要基于干系人的角色。同时,信息系统项目绩效并非单纯由成功或失败因素所决定,而是取决于两类因素的均衡程度。研究结论为信息系统项目的风险控制提供了全新的理论依据和决策支持。

关键词: 信息系统, 项目管理, 风险, 控制, 过程绩效

Abstract: Although project management ability is improved continuously, the success rate of enterprise information systems project is still pessimistic. Lack of roles orientation and mutual understanding, and lack of effective risk control mechanisms are the key factors that negatively influence project performance. In order to explore the joint effect of risk and control on information systems project performance from different perspectives, 65 project managers and 63 user liaisons from 128 projects are investigated. Furthermore, empirical analysis is conducted by using structural equation model. Hypotheses are tested by employing hierarchical regression analysis. The results show that both formal and informal controls positively affected project performance. However, formal control is more effective for project managers, while informal control is more effective for user liaisons. In addition, organization risk and technology risk suppress the effect of formal and informal controls on performance from the perspectives of both project managers and user liaisons. Therefore, the choice of control should not only be based on the characteristics of projects, but also on the role of stakeholders. Moreover, the project performance not only depends on success or failure factors, also on their balance. The research results provide a new conceptual framework and decision-making support for controlling risks in information systems projects.

Key words: information technology, project management, risk, control, process performance

中图分类号:

C931

刘敏, 刘汕, 张金隆. 风险环境下企业信息系统项目控制对绩效的影响机制研究:基于项目经理和用户代表的双重视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 78-87.

LIU Min, LIU Shan, ZHANG Jin-long. The Impact of Control on Performance of Enterprise Information Technology Project in the Risk Environment: The View from Project Managers and User Liaisons[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10): 78-87.

参考文献

[1] Curtis J. The importance of a great project manager[EB/OL].[2012-6-25] [2012-12-30] http://quotient.net/blog/2012/6/25/the-importance-of-a-great-project-manager/.

[2] CSDN.2013年ERP研究:CFO需重视失败率[EB/OL].[2013-03-04].http://www.csdn.net/article/a/2013-03-04/15814265.

[3] 白海青, 毛基业. 影响ERP成功应用的关键因素因果模型——上线后的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2011,(3):102-111.

[4] 朱宗乾, 师红昆, 张永辉. 基于影响图理ERP项目实施风险评价模型研究[J]. 管理评论, 2010, 22(12):45-52.

[5] Kirsch L. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management[J]. Information Systems Research, 1997, 8(3):215-239.

[6] Kirsch L, Sambamurthy V, Ko D, et al. Controlling information systems development projects:The view from the client[J]. Management Science, 2002, 48(4):484-498.

[7] Kirsch L J, Ko D, Haney M H. Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control:Adding social capital as a predictor[J]. Organization Science, 2010, 21(2), 469-489.

[8] Kirsch L. Deployingcommon systems globally:The dynamics of control[J]. Information Systems Research, 2004, 15(4):374-395.

[9] 李晓燕, 毛基业. 动态能力构建——基于离岸软件外包供应商的多案例研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(11):55-64.

[10] Klein G, Beranek P, Martz B, et al. The relationship of control and learning to project performance[J]. Cybernetics and Systems:An International Journal, 2006, 37(2-3):137-150.

[11] Rustagi S, King W R, Kirsch L J. Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships[J]. Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(2):126-143.

[12] Harris M L, Collins R W, Hevner A R. Control of flexible software development under uncertainty[J]. Information Systems Research, 2009, 20(3):400-419.

[13] Gopal A, Gosain S. The role of organizational controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing:Implications for project performance[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4), 960-982.

[14] Markus M L, Mao Jiye. Participation in development and implementation-updating an old, tired concept for today's IS contexts[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2004, 5(11-12):514-544.

[15] 潘绵臻, 毛基业. 反思性学习会议对ERP实施中用户参与的影响——基于心理授权的视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(12):21-36.

[16] Tiwana A, Keil M, Control in internal and outsourced systems development projects[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2010, 26(3), 9-44.

[17] 刘汕, 张金隆, 陈涛. 企业IT项目控制模式对绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(7):112-120.

[18] 曹萍, 陈福集. 基于证据推理的软件项目投标风险评估[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(7):106-111.

[19] 谷晓燕, 何锋, 蔡晨. 风险条件下基于实物期权的研发项目多阶段评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(4):68-75.

[20] 朱宗乾, 李艳霞, 张美. 基于风险控制的ERP项目风险分担模型研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(11):91-99.

[21] 李轲, 宋华明, 许前, 等. 考虑风险偏好的外包质量风险控制与激励机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S1):190-197.

[22] Keil M, Rai A, Liu Shan. How user risk and requirements risk moderate the effects of formal and informal control on the process performance of IT projects[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2013, 22(6):650-672.

[23] Tiwana A. Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(7):769-780.

[24] Tiwana A. Systems development ambidexterity:Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2010, 27(2):87-126.

[25] Liu Shan. How team risk and planning and control risk moderate the effects of clan and self control on the process performance of IT projects:The perspective of the user liaison[J]. Information Development, 2015,31(1):27-39.

[26] Liu Shan, Wang Lin. Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects:The role of strategic importance[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(8):1494-1510.

[27] Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A. How software project risk affects project performance:An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model[J]. Decision Sciences, 2004, 35(2):289-321.

[28] Liu Shan, Zhang Jinlong, Keil M, et al. Comparing senior executive and project manager perceptions of IT project risk:A Chinese Delphi study[J]. Information Systems Journal, 2010, 20(4), 319-355.

[29] Love P, Josephson P. Role of error-recovery process in projects[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2004, 20(2):70-79.

[30] Lee Y, Cavusgil T S. Enhancing alliance performance:The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59(8):896-905.

[31] Ouchi W A. Conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms[J]. Management Science, 1979, 25(9):833-848.

[32] Sengün A, Wasti S. Trust, control, and risk:A test of Das and Teng's conceptual framework for pharmaceutical buyer-supplier relationships[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2007, 32(4):430-464.

[33] Rustagi S. Antecedents of success in IS outsourcing:A control theory perspective[D]. Pittsturyh:University of Pittsburgh, 2004.

[34] 刘家国, 施高伟, 赵金楼. 企业ERP关键实施活动的强化机制[J]. 管理评论, 2013, 25(5):72-81.

[35] 叶强, 方安儒, 鲁奇, 等. 组织因素对ERP使用绩效的影响机制——基于中国数据的实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(11):77-85.

[36] 王长峰. 研发项目过程风险管理方法综合集成问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(4):148-155.

[37] Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A. Understanding software project risk:A cluster analysis[J]. Information & Management, 2004, 42(1):115-125.

[38] Petter S, Straub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(4):623-656.

[39] Chin W W, Marcolin B L, Newsted P R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects:Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion adoption study[J]. Information Systems Research, 2003, 14(2):189-220.

[40] Gefen D, Straub D. A practical guide to factorial validity using pls-graph:Tutorial and annotated example[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2005, 16(9):91-109.

[41] Fornell C, Larcker D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1):39-50.

[42] Cohen J, Cohen P, West S G, et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences[M]. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.

风险环境下企业信息系统项目控制对绩效的影响机制研究:基于项目经理和用户代表的双重视角

The Impact of Control on Performance of Enterprise Information Technology Project in the Risk Environment: The View from Project Managers and User Liaisons

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	黄苒,胡丽琴,李梦圆. 专有关系投资、议价力与企业违约风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 11-23.
[2]	张艳芬,徐琪,孙中苗. 供应商竞争下考虑道德风险的平台供应链最优动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 160-170.
[3]	牛苗苗,谭显春,郭建新,朱开伟,程永龙. 碳总量控制政策对中国经济高质量发展的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 24-34.
[4]	王正新,吴心思,刘俊. 企业风险水平与对外直接投资区位选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 323-334.
[5]	李建莹,刘维奇,原东良. 企业社会责任与股价极端波动风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 15-24.
[6]	廖朴,杨弘琦,黄新宇. 健康风险下居民人身保险最优配置方案研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 61-73.
[7]	葛晨晨,朱建军. 线上线下协同的全渠道零售供应链系统的鲁棒控制与优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 150-162.
[8]	陶毅,杨锐思,林强,王帆. 考虑竞争与风险规避行为的电商供应链融资与定价决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 190-200.
[9]	张磊,叶鑫. 考虑风险态度和自信行为的应急响应等级决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 120-128.
[10]	何汉,李思呈. 基于有向复杂网络的担保圈违约风险传染建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 22-33.
[11]	苏春,刘星. 家族董事席位超额控制会影响企业风险承担吗？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 34-45.
[12]	孙中苗,徐琪,张艳芬. 信息不对称下按需服务平台拥有不同类型代理人时的动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 241-253.
[13]	谢林利,凌爱凡. 权益极端尾部风险、杠杆率与公司债信用利差[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 47-60.
[14]	刘澜飚,郭亮. 中国A股市场下行风险研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 61-72.
[15]	张雪彤,张卫国,王超. 发达市场与新兴市场的尾部风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 14-25.