基金公司竞争策略研究——基于产品创新和机制创新视角

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.006

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (12): 45-52.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.006

基金公司竞争策略研究——基于产品创新和机制创新视角

蒋运冰^1,2, 王燕鸣¹, 王恕慧³, 李胜兰¹

1. 中山大学岭南学院, 广东广州 510275;
2. 广州越秀集团有限公司博士后科研工作站, 广东广州 510623;
3. 广州越秀金融控股集团有限公司, 广东广州 510623

收稿日期:2013-12-23 修回日期:2015-07-14 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-31
作者简介:蒋运冰(1983-),女(汉族),湖北人,广州越秀集团有限公司,经济学博士,博士后,研究方向:金融市场与投资、公司治理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(71402170);浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(LQ13G020017);教育部人文社科项目(14YJC630099);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2015M580711)

Research on Fund Companies Competition Strategy——Based on Product Innovation and Mechanism Innovation Perspective

JIANG Yun-bing^1,2, WANG Yan-ming¹, WANG Shu-hui³, LI Sheng-lan¹

1. Lingnan College, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
2. Postdoctoral Program, Yuexiu Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510623, China;
3. Yuexiu Financial Holdings Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510623, China

Received:2013-12-23 Revised:2015-07-14 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以2004-2012年提供开放式基金的基金公司为研究对象,以基金公司市场份额为切入点,利用动态面板模型,检验了基金公司历史业绩、产品创新策略和机制创新策略在基金公司竞争中的有效性。实证结果显示历史业绩是影响基金公司市场竞争力的重要因素,基金投资者偏好具有产品创新能力和机制创新精神的基金公司,并不热衷于投资成立时间久、旗下基金数量众多的老牌金公司,对基金公司股东背景也没有显著偏好。进一步细分市场发现,在股票型基金市场上,实施创造明星策略有利于获得更高市场份额。在债券型基金市场上,提高新基金供给量和相对供给强度是最优策略。与股票型基金市场相同,在混合型基金市场上提供具有实质性创新特征的新基金、增加基金从业者持基的基金数量,有助于获得更大市场份额。因此,基金公司决策层在制定竞争战略时,应当考虑基金投资者对产品创新认知能力的提高和对利益绑定机制的诉求,依据基金类型的不同,设计具有针对性的竞争策略。

关键词: 基金公司, 市场份额, 产品创新, 机制创新

Abstract: In this paper, the effectiveness of product innovation strategy and mechanism innovation strategy in fund company competition during 2004-2012 are examined. Taking market share as entry point with a dynamic panel data model estimated by system general moment method (system GMM), the empirical result shows that historical performance is an important factor that affects the market competition results. Meanwhile investors prefer the fund company with superior product innovation ability and enterprising spirit of mechanism innovation, rather than fund companies with a long history and many funds under management. The fund company ownership is irrelevant. Segmenting the fund market by investment targets, it's demonstrated that in the stock fund market, star strategy is particularly important, while in the bond fund market, the increasing supply of new funds and relative supply intensity is the optimal strategy. The same as in the stock fund company, to gain more market share fund company should provide new funds with substantial innovation characteristics and increase the number of funds that fund practitioners hold. Therefore, decision-makers of fund company should take fund investors' improved cognitive ability of product innovation and the need to bind the interests of related agents into consideration, and formulate the competition strategy according to different types of fund.

Key words: fund company, market share, product innovation, mechanism innovation

中图分类号:

F830.9

蒋运冰, 王燕鸣, 王恕慧, 李胜兰. 基金公司竞争策略研究——基于产品创新和机制创新视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 45-52.

JIANG Yun-bing, WANG Yan-ming, WANG Shu-hui, LI Sheng-lan. Research on Fund Companies Competition Strategy——Based on Product Innovation and Mechanism Innovation Perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(12): 45-52.

参考文献

[1] Khorana A, Servaes H. What drives market share in the mutual fund industry?[J] Review of Finance, 2012, 16(1):81-113.

[2] Patel J, Zeckhauser R, Hendricks D. The rationality struggle:Illustrations from financial markets[J]. American Economic Review, 1991,81(2):232-236.

[3] Chevalier J, Ellison G. Career concerns of mutual fund managers[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114(2):389-432.

[4] Sirri E R, Tufano P. Costly search and mutual fund flows[J]. Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(5):1589-1622.

[5] Chevalier J, Ellison G. Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1997, 105(6):1167-1200.

[6] Nanda V, Wang Z J, Zheng Lu. Family values and the star phenomenon:Strategies of mutual fund families[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2004, 17(3):667-698.

[7] Ippolito R A. Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality:Evidence from the mutual fund industry[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1992, 35(1):45-70.

[8] Gaspar J M, Massa M, Matos P. Favoritism in mutual fund families? Evidence on strategic cross-fund subsidization[J]. Journal of Finance, 2006, 61(1):73-104.

[9] 肖峻, 石劲. 基金业绩与资金流量:我国基金市场存在"赎回异象"吗?[J].经济研究, 2011, (01):112-125.

[10] 冯旭南,李心愉. 参与成本、基金业绩与投资者选择[J]. 管理世界,2013,(4):48-58.

[11] Kempf A, Ruenzi S. Tournaments in mutual-fund families[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2008,21(2):1013-1036.

[12] Wahal S, Wang A Y. Competition among mutual funds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011,99(1):40-59.

[13] 饶育蕾,王颖,戴鹏君. 基金竞赛还是职业生涯关注?——对基金经理风险选择的实证研究[J]. 管理工程学报,2013,(02):65-70.

[14] 王燕鸣, 蒋运冰. 薪酬激励、雇佣风险和预期偏差对我国开放式基金风险调整行为的影响[J]. 管理评论,2013,(11):12-22.

[15] Boyer B, Zheng Lu. Investor flows and stock market returns[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2009, 16(1):87-100.

[16] Spiegel M, Zhang Hong. Mutual fund risk and market share-adjusted fund flows[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013, 108(2):506-528.

[17] Khorana A, Servaes H, Wedge L. Portfolio manager ownership and fund performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 85(1):179-204.

[18] Evans A L. Portfolio manager ownership and mutual fund performance[J]. Financial Management, 2008, 37(3):513-534.

[19] Cremers M, et al. Does skin in the game matter? Director incentives and governance in the mutual fund industry[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2009, 44(6):1345-1373.

[20] Ma Linlin, Tang Yuehua. Portfolio manager ownership and mutual fund risk taking[C]//Proceedings of 13th American Finance Association Annual Meeting,San Diego,January 4-6,2013.

[21] Chen J, Hong H, Huang Ming, et al. Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization[J]. American Economic Review, 2004,94(5):1276-1302.

[22] Massa M. How do family strategies affect fund performance? When performance-maximization is not the only game in town[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003,67(2):249-304.

[23] Mehran H,Stulz R M. The economics of conflicts of interest in financial institutions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 85(2):267-296.

[24] 滕莉莉,韦妃,梁权熙. 管理人持基的投资基金治理效应:理论分析与经验证据[J]. 投资研究,2013,32(12):55-67.

[25] 江萍,田澍,Yan-Leung C. 基金管理公司股权结构与基金绩效研究[J]. 金融研究,2011,(06):123-135.

基金公司竞争策略研究——基于产品创新和机制创新视角

Research on Fund Companies Competition Strategy——Based on Product Innovation and Mechanism Innovation Perspective

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	徐涛, 尤建新, 邵一磊. 风险视角下银行产品创新绩效评价模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 36-47.
[2]	余祥瑀, 黄守军, 杨俊. 多寡头电力市场中考虑水平合作的碳减排竞争微分对策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 189-199.
[3]	胡盛强, 刘晓斌, 王新林. 阿米巴经营模式下面向定制需求的生产线管理机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 119-131.
[4]	孔婷, 冯泰文, 李刚. 营销-制造整合与新产品市场成功：产品创新程度的调节效应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 61-70.
[5]	曾薇, 陈收, 周忠宝. 金融监管对商业银行产品创新影响——基于两阶段DEA模型的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 1-7.
[6]	秦剑. 研发/制造/营销跨职能整合与新产品开发：产品创新性的差异效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(1): 130-138.
[7]	赵道致, 韩敬稳, 秦娟娟. 基于转换成本的供应链成员讨价还价能力研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(4): 79-85.
[8]	聂佳佳, 熊中楷, 曹俊. 双寡头市场中品牌广告竞争和大类广告合作策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(2): 134-142.
[9]	毕克新, 艾明晔, 李柏洲. 产品创新与工艺创新协同发展分析模型与方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(4): 138-148.
[10]	胡松, 赵平, 裘晓东. 价格促销对消费者品牌选择的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(2): 134-140.
[11]	张彬, 杨国英, 荣国辉. 产品扩散模型在Internet采用者分析中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (2): 51-56.
[12]	吕涛, 王震声. 产品创新领先企业竞争优势研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2001, (1): 74-80.
[13]	胡树华. 国内外产品创新管理研究综述[J]. 中国管理科学, 1999, (1): 65-76.