考虑维修服务质量的产品质保联合决策

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.02.006

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 47-55.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.02.006

考虑维修服务质量的产品质保联合决策

王轩, 刘丽文

清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2014-08-24 修回日期:2015-03-05 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-02-25
通讯作者: 王轩 E-mail:wangx3.11@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介:王轩(1985-),男(汉族),河南人,清华大学经济管理学院,博士生,研究方向:管理科学与工程,E-mail:wangx3.11@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70972030)

Joint Warranty Decisions Research Considering Warranty Service Quality

WANG Xuan, LIU Li-wen

School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2014-08-24 Revised:2015-03-05 Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在售后服务竞争日益激烈的大环境下,维修服务质量对于企业的意义越来越重要。经典的质保决策问题通常关心质保期和产品价格的联合决策问题,本文在此基础上进一步考虑了质保维修的服务质量问题。质保期、产品价格以及维修服务质量在产品生命周期内存在动态的关联关系,目前同时考虑此三类因素的研究尚不多见。本文以具有重复购买行为的大众消费品为研究对象,构建了包括成本模型、需求模型、利润模型在内的最优控制模型,并应用最大化原理对模型进行求解分析,在此基础上进一步对最优策略在静态市场和动态市场的应用分别做了具体分析和数值试验。

关键词: 产品质保, 服务质量, 质保期, 产品价格, 重复购买, 静态与动态市场, 最大值原理

Abstract: Service quality becomes more and more important as after-sale service competitions become fierce in modern business. Scholars usually consider the joint decisions of warranty length and product price. In this paper, service quality decisions based on traditional warranty length and price optimization researches are concerned. Better service quality and warranty length can promote sales and raise the price. These three dimensions have dynamic relationship in product lifecycle, but few scholars consider them jointly. The market of consumer goods and developed optimal control problems including cost models, demand models and profit model were investigated in this paper. Manufactures' profit is optimized by choosing optimal service quality, price and warranty length jointly. The maximum principle method is used to obtain solutions. The optimal policies for static market were further investigated and Lingo11 was used to do some numerical tests for dynamic market. This research can help manufactures make better warranty policy and give consumers better warranty service.

Key words: warranty, service quality, warranty length, price, repeated purchase, static and dynamic market, maximum principle

中图分类号:

C931

王轩, 刘丽文. 考虑维修服务质量的产品质保联合决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(2): 47-55.

WANG Xuan, LIU Li-wen. Joint Warranty Decisions Research Considering Warranty Service Quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(2): 47-55.

参考文献

[1] 王轩,刘丽文. 静态市场下考虑重复购买的价格和质保期联合决策[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(4):70-77.

[2] Kim S H, Cohen M A, Netessine S. Performance contracting in after-sales service supply chains[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(12):1843-1858.

[3] Cohen M A, Whang S. Competing in product and service:A product life-cycle model[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(4):535-545.

[4] Park M, Pham H. A new warranty policy with failure times and warranty servicing times[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliabilities, 2012, 61(3):822-831.

[5] Li L. The role of inventory in delivery-time competition[J]. Management Science, 1992, 38(2):182-197.

[6] Lederer P J, Li L. Pricing, production, scheduling, and delivery-time competition[J]. Operations Research, 1997, 45(3):407-420.

[7] So K C, Song Jingsheng. Price, delivery time guarantees and capacity selection[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 111(1):28-49.

[8] So K C. Price and time competition for service delivery[J]. Manufactuning & Services Operations Management, 2000, 2(4):392-409.

[9] Emons W. The theory of warranty contracts[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1989, 3(1):43-57.

[10] Glickman T S, Berger P D. Optimal price and protection period decisions for a product under warranty[J]. Management Science, 1976, 22(12):1381-1390.

[11] Mesak H I. Modeling monopolist pricing and protection period decisions for new products under warranty[J]. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 1996, 17(4):231-252.

[12] Huang Hongzhong, Liu Zhijie, Murthy D N P. Optimal reliability, warranty and price for new products[J]. ⅡE Transactions, 2007, 39(8):819-827.

[13] Manna D K. Price-warranty length decision with Glickman-Berger model[J]. International Journal of Reliability and Safety, 2008, 2(3):221-233.

[14] Lin Peichun, Shue L Y. Application of optimal control theory to product pricing and warranty with free replacement under the influence of basic lifetime distributions[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2005, 48(1):69-82.

[15] Wu C C, Lin Peichun, Chou Chaoyu. Determination of price and warranty length for a normal lifetime distributed product[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 102(1):95-107.

[16] Wu C C, Chou Chaoyun, Huang Chikong. Optimal burn-in time and warranty length under fully renewing combination free replacement and pro-rata warranty[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(7):914-920.

[17] Wu C C, Chou Chaoyu, Huang Chikong. Optimal price, warranty length and production rate for free replacement policy in the static demand market[J], Omega, 2009, 37(1):29-39.

[18] Wu C C, Huang Chikong, Chou Chaoyu,et al. An empirical study on the determination of price, warranty length and production rate in the static sales market[J]. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2009, 26(2):126-134.

[19] Lin Peichun, Wang Jenhung, Chin S S. Dynamic optimization of price, warranty length and production rate[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2009, 40(4):411-420.

[20] Zhou Zhefang, Li Yanjun, Tang K. Dynamic pricing and warranty policies for products with fixed lifetime[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3):940-948.

[21] Bass F M. A new product growth for model consumer durables[J]. Management Science, 1969, 15(5):215-227.

[22] Mesak H I, Berg W D. Incorporating price and replacement purchases in new product diffusion models for consumer durables[J]. Decision Sciences, 1995, 26(4):425-450.

[23] Teng J T, Thompson G L. Optimal strategies for general price-quality decision models of new products with learning production costs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 93(3):476-489.

考虑维修服务质量的产品质保联合决策

Joint Warranty Decisions Research Considering Warranty Service Quality

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	贾俊秀,侯毅姝,杜黎. 考虑转诊率的健康服务质量及定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 109-119.
[2]	孟秀丽,杨静,刘波. 基于大数据技术的众包物流服务质量竞争策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 130-140.
[3]	李波,张春燕,张俊飚. 食品企业质量安全意识提升的演化博弈逻辑[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 315-324.
[4]	孟秀丽, 刘波, 安坤. 考虑配送员交互作用和服务质量的众包物流运营模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(5): 218-229.
[5]	宋金波, 周禹杉, 何秋映. 情绪负荷对网络问政平台运作服务质量和效率的影响—来自文本数据的证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(3): 133-142.
[6]	孟秀丽,吴一凡,刘波. 考虑延误险的多期众包物流服务质量优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 87-95.
[7]	杨天山,袁功林. 考虑绿色配送技术投资的易腐品动态定价与补货策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 279-287.
[8]	郭英, 刘志学, 覃雪莲. 考虑质量成本的物流服务供应链纵向整合策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 140-151.
[9]	李坚飞, 孙梦霞, 李蓓. 零售服务供应链动态演化中存在“质量桥”吗？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 130-142.
[10]	杨晓荣, 杜荣. IT驱动的虚拟社区知识共享对跨境电商服务质量的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 226-233.
[11]	孟秀丽, 杨静, 吴一凡. 考虑奖惩机制和成本互担的众包物流服务质量最优控制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11): 182-195.
[12]	胡斌, 丁龙, 胡森, 封益航. 制造商售后服务质量决策对灰色市场的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 46-56.
[13]	刁姝杰, 匡海波, 孟斌, 石宝峰. 基于前景理论的LSSC服务质量管控策略的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 33-45.
[14]	桂云苗, 武众, 龚本刚. 竞争环境下双边平台增值服务质量投资竞争研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 65-76.
[15]	郭鑫鑫, 王海燕, 许蒙蒙. 医疗信息共享对患者转移数量和服务质量水平影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 226-236.