财务特征对担保方定价策略影响的实证研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.06.018

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 151-158.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.06.018

财务特征对担保方定价策略影响的实证研究

冷奥琳¹, 张俊瑞¹, 邢光远²

1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西西安 710049;
2. 西安交通大学经济与金融学院, 陕西西安 710061

收稿日期:2015-03-12 修回日期:2015-10-08 出版日期:2016-06-20 发布日期:2016-07-05
通讯作者: 冷奥琳(1986-),女(汉族),陕西西安人,西安交通大学管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:财务与会计、利率,E-mail:leyiha@hotmail.com. E-mail:leyiha@hotmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172186,71472148,71572144)

The Effect of Financial Characteristic of Guarantors' on the Pricing Policy of Loan Guarantees: An Empirical Study

LENG Ao-lin¹, ZHANG Jun-rui¹, XING Guang-yuan²

1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
2. School of Economic and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Received:2015-03-12 Revised:2015-10-08 Online:2016-06-20 Published:2016-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 2007年证监会和银监会联合发布《120号通知》要求强制披露上市公司对外担保实施以来,详细查阅上市公司信息披露公告获知,2007至2014年间超过40%的上市公司存在对外担保业务;提供担保公司的资产负债率均值54.07%、资产收益率均值为3.07%,未提供担保公司的资产负债率均值43%、资产收益率均值4.5%,揭示担保公司财务特征对担保行为选择具有一定影响。为深入诠释该现象,本文基于"担保价格不仅取决于担保是否给公司带来正净现金流,而且取决于提供担保后所有者权益占公司比例的变化程度"的理性担保方定价策略,构建担保供需理论模型,逻辑推理给出研究假设。利用2007至2014中国A股主板非金融类上市公司的样本进行检验发现:(1)提供担保公司数量先随公司所有者权益占资产总额比重的增加而增加,但当超过某一阈值后随公司所有者权益比重的增加而减少,特别资产负债率影响对外担保行为由增到减拐点的阈值:国有上市公司在80%左右,非国有公司在70%左右。(2)提供担保公司数量先随公司盈利能力增强而增加,但超过某一阈值后随公司盈利能力增强而减少,特别公司盈利能力影响对外担保行为由增到减拐点的阈值:国有上市公司在11%左右,非国有公司在13%左右;给出国有上市公司由于政府的隐性担保带来的资信福利,导致国有上市公司在同等条件下,资信水平较非国有公司高估,导致担保契约增加拐点和担保契约减少拐点都比非国有公司财务状况要差。

关键词: 担保行为, 定价策略, 产权性质

Abstract: After the implementation of No.120 announcement issued by China Securities Regulatory Commission and China Banking Regulatory Commission, according to our survey, from 2007 to 2014, over 40% of the list firms provide loan guarantees to a third party; and the average leverage and return on asset (ROA) of those firms which provide loan guarantees to third party is 54.07% and 3.07% separately. Compared with that, the average leverage and return on asset (ROA) of firms without the provision of loan guarantees is 43% and 4.5% separately. The large difference in financial characteristics between firms with and without loan guarantee indicates that the financial characteristics may affect the provision of loan guarantees. To interpret this phenomenon, a theoretical model is built based on the rational pricing policy: (1) a guarantee contract must has positive net cash flow, and (2) a guarantee contract must not change the ration of equity and debt. And then using the sample from Chinese stock exchange from year 2007 to 2014, it is found that (1) at beginning, the provision of loan guarantee positively related to the leverage of guarantor and the performance of guarantor. But these relation turn to the opposite side after a threshold value. (2) The threshold values of leverage and performance are different between state-owned companies and non-state-owned companies. At the threshold values, non-state-owned companies showed lower leverage and better performance. These results indicate that because of the implicate guarantee of government, even with the same financial characteristic, state-owned companies have better credit score than non-stated-owned companies.

Key words: loan guarantee behavior, pricing policy, ownership

中图分类号:

F224

冷奥琳, 张俊瑞, 邢光远. 财务特征对担保方定价策略影响的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(6): 151-158.

LENG Ao-lin, ZHANG Jun-rui, XING Guang-yuan. The Effect of Financial Characteristic of Guarantors' on the Pricing Policy of Loan Guarantees: An Empirical Study[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(6): 151-158.

参考文献

[1] 刘小年,郑仁满. 公司业绩、资本结构与对外信用担保[J]. 金融研究,2005,(4):155-164.

[2] Berkman H, Cole R A, Fu L J. Expropriation through loan guarantees to related parties:Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009, 33(1):141-156.

[3] Jian Ming, Xu Ming. Determinants of the guarantee circles:The case of Chinese listed firms[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2012, 20(1):78-100.

[4] 冷奥琳,张俊瑞,邢光远.公司对外担保违约风险传递机理和影响效应研究——基本上市公司债券利差数据的实证分析[J].管理评论,2015,07:3-14.

[5] Merton R C. An analytic derivation of the cost of deposit insurance and loan guarantees an application of modern option pricing theory[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1977, 1(1):3-11.

[6] Sosin H B. On the valuation of federal loan guarantees to corporations[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1980, 35(5):1209-1221.

[7] 孙艳,郭菊娥,王乐. 基于债务展期的企业融资担保合约博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2009,17(3):159-165.

[8] Jones E P, Mason S P, Rosenfeld E. Contingent claims analysis of corporate capital structures:An empirical investigation[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1984, 39(3):611-625.

[9] Cook D O, Spellman L J. Firm and guarantor risk, risk contagion, and the interfirm spread among insured deposits[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1996, 31(2):265-281.

[10] 顾海峰. 中小企业信用担保风险形成的内在机制研究[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2007, 28(3):8-11.

[11] 贾芳琳,黄亚雄,奚君羊. 我国担保契约的保费费率定价问题[J]. 经济数学,2010,27(2):62-66.

[12] 孙艳,郭菊娥,王乐. 基于障碍期权的可提前终止贷款担保价值研究[J]. 当代经济科学,2010,32(1):77-83,127.

[13] Heal G. Guarantees and risk-sharing[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1977, 44(3):549-560.

[14] Selby M J P, Franks J R, Karki J P. Loan guarantees, wealth transfers and incentives to invest[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1988, 37(1):47-65.

[15] Roland G. On the speed and sequencing of privatisation and restructuring[J]. The Economic Journal, 1994, 104(426):1158-1168.

[16] Jennings P, Beaver G. The performance and competitive advantage of small firms:A management perspective[J]. International Small Business Journal, 1997, 15(2):63-75.

[17] 陈欣,邓攀. 啤酒花,担保圈的"恶之花"[J]. 投资与合作,2003,(12):80-81.

[18] 杜权,郑炳蔚. 对当前浙江企业担保链问题的思考[J]. 浙江金融,2010,(6):20-21.

[19] 万良勇,魏明海. 金融生态、利益输送与信贷资源配置效率——基于河北担保圈的案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2009,(5):6-16+46+187.

[20] Johnson S, Porta R L, Lopez-de-Silanes F, et al. Tunneling[J]. Amercian Economic Review, 2000,90(2):22-27.

[21] Leng Aolin, Zhang Junrui, Xing Guangyuan. Will capital structure and performance affect external financial guarantee behavior?[C]//Proceedings of 2014 Seventh International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO), Beijing, July 4-6,2014.

[22] Stiglitz J E, Andrew W. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information[J]. The American Economic Review, 1981, 7(3):393-410.

[23] Merton R C. On the pricing of corporate debt:The risk structure of interest rates[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1974, 29(2):449-470.

[24] 杨清香,俞麟,宋丽. 内部控制信息披露与市场反应研究——来自中国沪市上市公司的经验证据[J]. 南开管理评论,2012,15(1):123-130.

[25] 马晨, 程茂勇,张俊瑞. 事务所变更能帮助公司提升审计质量吗?——来自二次财务重述的经验证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2014,(10):109-120.

财务特征对担保方定价策略影响的实证研究

The Effect of Financial Characteristic of Guarantors' on the Pricing Policy of Loan Guarantees: An Empirical Study

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	潘思明,陆绍凯,刘盼. 考虑异质性双边效应的网络平台追加投资与定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 193-200.
[2]	杜恒,卢珂. 供给短缺下考虑消费异质性的零售商定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 201-211.
[3]	占济舟,晋雅琪. 考虑退货运费险的竞争型电商平台定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 325-334.
[4]	丁军飞,陈伟达,付帅帅. 再制造环境下基于碳期权合约的供应链定价与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 95-104.
[5]	汪乐,宋杨,范体军. 制造商直播引入的策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(2): 276-284.
[6]	张志远,叶涛锋. 考虑不同计费方式的SaaS服务供应商定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 214-223.
[7]	蔺康康,刘新民,王垒. 基于策略消费者行为的动态定价与降价时机选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 224-233.
[8]	王海平,林军,冉伦. 竞争环境下SaaS提供商的定价策略选择及其社会福利分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 89-96.
[9]	冯春, 何征, 郭倩芸, 张怡. 零售商引入扶贫产品的策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(6): 25-38.
[10]	桂云苗, 程静, 龚本刚. 不同信息策略下竞争型网络货运平台定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(5): 176-186.
[11]	张巧可, 陈洪转, 万良琪. 酒店直销与在线旅行社分销渠道策略优化分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(2): 235-244.
[12]	李丹,刘咏梅,陈晓红. 线上平台的定价和优惠策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 165-173.
[13]	王俊斌, 范小军. 顾客价值共创模式下的零售商定价与服务策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 164-172.
[14]	熊峰, 魏瑶瑶, 王琼林, 李知远, 邵乐. 考虑成员风险规避的双渠道绿色供应链定价与绿色投入决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 267-276.
[15]	杨浩雄, 顾子跃, 王浩, 赵川. 考虑跨渠道退货的双渠道供应链最优策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 116-126.