主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (10): 105-116.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.10.012

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于在线报价与固定价格的闭环供应链最优决策研究

李建斌1, 朱梦萍1, 戴宾2   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430074;
    2. 武汉大学经济与管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-20 修回日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2016-10-20 发布日期:2016-12-27
  • 通讯作者: 戴宾(1983-),男(汉族),湖南人,武汉大学经济与管理学院副教授,研究方向:物流与供应链管理,E-mail:bin_dai@whu.edu.cn. E-mail:bin_dai@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71571079,71171088,71131004,71301122,71671133);教育部新世纪人才支持基金(NCET-13-0228);中央高校基本科研业务费(HUST,CXY12M013,武汉大学自主科研项目(人文社科)

Research on Optimal Strategies in a Closed-loop Supply Chain under NYOP and Posted Price Mechanism

LI Jian-bin1, ZHU Meng-ping1, DAI Bin2   

  1. 1. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2015-04-20 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2016-10-20 Published:2016-12-27

摘要: 本文研究闭环供应链中制造商在逆向渠道采用单一在线报价,两次在线报价和固定价格模式来回收折旧品的最优决策问题。研究表明,虽然两次报价比单一报价给消费者带来更高的期望效用,然而从制造商的利润来看,两次报价是较劣的策略。制造商选择单一报价和固定价格的回收模式,主要取决于再制造节约成本和预设价格的上限。如果预设价格的上限低于某临界值,随着节约成本增加,制造商的最优策略从固定价格转变为单一报价;如果预设价格的上限超过该临界值,制造商的最优策略一直是固定价格模式。最后,通过算例分析进一步探讨了重要参数对制造商利润的影响,揭示了制造商可以向消费者传递更低的预设价格上限来获利的管理意义。

关键词: 闭环供应链, 再制造, 在线报价, 固定价格

Abstract: In the recycling and remanufacturing industry, used items are often recycled by a posted price (PP) mechanism. Recently, some online platforms of resource recycling also permit the seller to use the name-your-own-price (NYOP) mechanism, meaning that used items will only be recycled when the bid proposed by the seller is no larger than an opaque reserve price predetermined by the recycling agent. However, in the academic field of closed-loop supply chain, thus far, few researches have been conducted on investigating the NYOP mechanism. In this paper, it's aimed to investigate the optimal strategies in a closed-loop supply chain under three pricing mechanisms:posted price, single-bid NYOP and double-bid NYOP when consumers can additionally propose a second bid if the first bid fails. A Stackelberg game is employed to analyze consumers' and the manufacturer's strategies where the latter acts as the leader and the former act as a follower. Based on the nonlinear optimization, the optimal bid for the consumer and the optimal reserve price for the recycling agent under aforementioned three pricing mechanisms are obtained. Furthermore, the optimal strategies among those three pricing mechanisms are compared in terms of profit as well. Result shows that the double-bid mechanism brings about more expected utility for consumers, however, from the perspective of the manufacturer's profit, the double-bid NYOP mechanism is an inferior strategy. In addition, whether the manufacture adopts the single-bid NYOP mechanism or the posted price mechanism depends on saved cost due to remanufacturing activities and the upper bound of the reserve price. If the upper bound of the reserve price is lower than a certain threshold, as the saved cost increases, the optimal strategy is converted from PP mechanism to the single-bid NYOP mechanism. However, if the upper bound is higher than the threshold, PP mechanism is always the optimal strategy. Moreover, we investigate the effects of key parameters such as the ratio of green consumers on the manufacturer's profit through numerical studies, and obtain some managerial insights including that the manufacturer should reveal more information such as a lower upper bound of the reserve price to the consumers. Our research enriches the study of consumers' behavior in the closed-loop supply chain, and provides a reasonable explanation to observations in the recycling industry. These results can also help the manufacturer to choose the optimal pricing mechanism to enhance his profit as well as environmental performance.

Key words: closed-loop supply chain, remanufacturing, name-your-own-price, posted price

中图分类号: