信贷资产证券化模式选择与产品设计

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.12.001

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (12): 1-9.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.12.001

• 论文 • 下一篇

信贷资产证券化模式选择与产品设计

张勇^1,2, 杨招军³, 罗鹏飞¹

1. 湖南大学金融与统计学院, 湖南长沙 410079;
2. 吉首大学数学与统计学院, 湖南吉首 416000;
3. 南方科技大学金融系, 中国深圳 518055

收稿日期:2016-02-24 修回日期:2016-06-27 出版日期:2016-12-20 发布日期:2017-03-07
通讯作者: 张勇(1976-),男(汉族),湖南怀化人,湖南大学金融与统计学院,金融工程专业博士生,研究方向:金融工程,E-mail:yz0745zy@163.com. E-mail:yz0745zy@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71371068，71171078）；2015湖南省教育厅一般科研项目（15C1156）

The Model Choice and Design of Credit Assets Securitization

ZHANG Yong^1,2, YANG Zhao-jun³, LUO Peng-fei¹

1. School of Finance and statistics, HunanUniversity, Changsha 410079, China;
2. School of Mathematic and statistics, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China;
3. Department of Finance, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received:2016-02-24 Revised:2016-06-27 Online:2016-12-20 Published:2017-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 信贷资产证券化具有盘活非流动资产、分散本性风险等优势，是公司从资本市场获得低成本融资的主要工具之一。本文假设资产池由多个相关、且均服从算术布朗运动的资产现金流组成，运用公司证券定价理论，得到了基于资产池总现金流的证券化产品价值的解析解。以商业银行为例，研究了资产证券化的动机和最佳发行方式。数值分析表明：资产证券化不仅可以盘活资本，而且可以提高资产的价值；资产池的总价值与进入资产池的各个部分现金流之间的相关系数存在单调递减的关系。最后，针对我国商业银行的资产证券化模式提出了建议。

关键词: 资产证券化, 金融创新, 结构融资, 资产支持证券, 波动率

Abstract: It is believed that asset securitization is the root cause of the recent financial crisis. But it is one of the main financing instruments to obtain cheap capital from the capital market because it has merits such as transforming illiquid assets into marketable securities and diversifying risk. China International Capital Corporation Limited forecasts that asset securitization will increase over 40 percent a year on average during next 5 years in China.In addition to its importance as a financial and asset restructuring tool, securitization originates various streams of academic research. But some important questions remain unexplained. The established models don't address why the firm should securitize its assets. They don't investigate wether securitization can be a viable alternative for the firm when it chooses its optimal corporate structure. A model of the multi-asset firm which provides an answer to these questions is developed. The model analyzes various corporate structures and validates asset securitization as one of the value maximizing options which can accomplish the optimal incorporation of the assets in the firm. In the framework of the model, the multi-asset firm can optimally choose between aggregating all the assets in one firm, securitizing a part of them through a securitization vehicle, or spinning them off into single-asset firms. These problems belong to the hot and cutting-edge research fields in finance. They are innovative and interesting in application for the practice of the asset securitization.Using corporate security pricing theory, explicit solutions for valuating all contingent claims are provided under the assumption that the cash flow of bank assets follows an arithmetic Brownian motion. An commercial bank is taken as an example, the motivation of commercial bank asset securitization and the optimal issuing method are given. Numerical analysis shows that:Asset securitization can revitalize the capital, and can improve the value of assets; the securitization lever decreases with the correlation coefficient. Finally, some advice is provided to our country commercial Banks asset securitization method.

Key words: asset securitization, financial innovation, structured finance, asset-backed securities, volatility

中图分类号:

张勇, 杨招军, 罗鹏飞. 信贷资产证券化模式选择与产品设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(12): 1-9.

ZHANG Yong, YANG Zhao-jun, LUO Peng-fei. The Model Choice and Design of Credit Assets Securitization[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(12): 1-9.

参考文献

[1] Riddiough T J. Optimal design and governance of asset-backed securities[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 1997, 6(2): 121-152.

[2] Affinito M, Tagliaferri E. Why do (or did?) banks securitize their loans? Evidence from Italy[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2010, 6(4): 189-202.

[3] Cardone-Riportella C, Samaniego-Medina R, Trujillo-Ponce A. What drives bank securitisation? The Spanish experience[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2010, 34(11): 2639-2651.

[4] Elul R. The economics of asset securitization[J]. Business Review, 2005,Q3:16-25.

[5] Boot A, Thakor A. Security design[J]. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(4): 1349-78.

[6] DeMarzo P, Duffie D. A liquidity‐based model of security design[J]. Econometrica, 1999, 67(1): 65-99.

[7] DeMarzo P M. The pooling and tranching of securities: A model of informed intermediation[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2005, 18(1): 1-35.

[8] Hennessy C. A theory of ABS design based on rational noise-traders[R]. Working Paper, London Business School, 2013.

[9] 郭桂霞, 王勇. 不确定流动性需求与银行资产证券化最优规模[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2012, 7: 001.

[10] 郭桂霞,巫和懋,魏旭,等. 银行资产证券化的风险自留监管: 作用机制和福利效果[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2014,13(3):887-916.

[11] 林敏华. 信贷资产证券化, 异质性投资者和金融风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 25-31.

[12] 赵志明, 杨招军, 王淼. 基于或有可转换证券的投资和融资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,124(7): 18-26.

[13] 宿成建. 现金流信息, 现金流风险与股票收益定价研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016,19(5): 102-113,126.

[14] Hartman-Glaser B, Piskorski T, Tchistyi A. Optimal securitization with moral hazard[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 104(1): 186-202.

[15] Leland H E, Pyle D H. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation[J]. Journal of Finance, 1977,32(2):371-87.

[16] Hill C A. Securitization: A low-cost sweetener for lemons[J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,2005,10(1):64-71.

[17] 马本江, 姜云芳, 陈晓红. 存在应收账款条件下中小企业不足额质押融资合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 35-44.

[18] 熊熊, 姚传伟, 张永杰. 中小企业联合担保贷款的计算实验金融分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3): 88-94.

[19] 徐朝辉, 周宗放. 内部控制、过度投资与公司信用风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(9): 21-27.

[20] Merton R C. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1974, 29(2): 449-470.

[21] Leland H E. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(4): 1213-1252.

[22] Skarabot J. Asset securitization and optimal asset structure of the firm[R]. prepared for EFMA, 2001.

[23] Leland H E, Toft K B. Optimal capital structure, endogenous bankruptcy, and the term structure of credit spreads[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1996, 51(3): 987-1019.

信贷资产证券化模式选择与产品设计

The Model Choice and Design of Credit Assets Securitization

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	吴鑫育,谢海滨,马超群. 经济政策不确定性与人民币汇率波动率[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(8): 1-14.
[2]	谢林利,凌爱凡. 权益极端尾部风险、杠杆率与公司债信用利差[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 47-60.
[3]	傅强,石泽龙. 系统性金融风险的联合网络关联度测量及频率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(2): 1-10.
[4]	叶志强,张顺明,沈雪晨,郑洁菲. 我国上市公司定向增发的收益波动率择时效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 30-40.
[5]	郭杨莉,马锋. 基于马尔科夫和混频数据模型的黄金期货市场波动率预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 13-22.
[6]	陆静, 喻浩. 产业政策对股票特质波动率的影响及机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 21-36.
[7]	陆静, 张银盈. “特质波动率之谜”与估计模型有关吗？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 36-48.
[8]	朱光伟, 杨涛, 杜在超. 融资融券约束与股市波动[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 13-29.
[9]	梁超, 魏宇, 马锋, 李霞飞. 我国黄金期货价格波动率预测研究：来自模型缩减方法的新证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 30-41.
[10]	闫妍, 李博. 付费主体差异对信用评级结果的影响机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 1-11.
[11]	鲁万波, 亢晶浩. GAS-SKST-F模型及其在高频多元波动率预测中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 77-87.
[12]	张跃军, 张晗, 王金丽. 考虑结构变化和长记忆性的国际原油价格波动率预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(9): 54-64.
[13]	吴鑫育, 李心丹, 马超群. 基于期权与高频数据信息的VaR度量研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(8): 13-23.
[14]	朱鹏飞, 唐勇, 洪晓梅, 卢团团. P2P网贷利率存在波动溢出吗？——基于时-频域溢出指数的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 82-92.
[15]	蔡光辉, 项琳. 中国铜期货市场波动率估计与风险度量——基于广义已实现测度的Realized HAR GARCH模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 1-12.