企业组织内部学习、外部学习及其协同作用对组织绩效的影响——内部结构和外部环境的调节作用研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.05.021

中国管理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 175-186.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.05.021

企业组织内部学习、外部学习及其协同作用对组织绩效的影响——内部结构和外部环境的调节作用研究

陈国权¹, 刘薇²

1. 清华大学经济管理学院, 北京 100084;
2. 中央财经大学商学院, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2016-06-06 修回日期:2016-11-21 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-08-26
通讯作者: 刘薇(1987-),女(蒙族),内蒙古人,中央财经大学商学院讲师,研究方向:组织学习与员工学习、领导力、情绪影响个体行为等,E-mail:liuwei@cufe.edu.cn. E-mail:liuwei@cufe.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目（71421061，71121001）；国家杰出青年基金项目（70625003）；教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金重大项目（06JJD630013）；教育部博士点基金（20090002110037）

Organizational Internal Learning, External learning and Organizational Performance in Corporations: The Moderating effect of Organizational Structure and Environmental Dynamism

CHEN Guo-quan¹, LIU Wei²

1. School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
2. Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2016-06-06 Revised:2016-11-21 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-08-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 尽管前人对于组织学习与组织绩效的关系已经展开了较多的研究，但是组织学习对组织绩效产生的影响并不是孤立的，组织学习要与组织内、外部情境因素相适应才能更好地发挥作用。内部学习和外部学习是强调组织学习不同来源的两种重要类型，而内部学习、外部学习及二者的协同作用对组织绩效的影响，会受到组织内部结构和外部环境怎样的调节作用还尚未得到探索和研究。本研究采用来自中国企业的213个样本，根据调查数据发现了，组织外部环境和内部结构特征对组织学习与组织绩效的关系同时起到了调节作用。组织外部环境动态性越高，组织内部有机结构程度越高，组织内部学习和外部学习对组织绩效的提升作用越明显。然而，在探讨不同内、外部环境条件下，内部和外部学习的协同作用对组织绩效的影响时，研究发现有机结构依旧能够支持内部学习和外部学习协同发挥对绩效的促进作用，而动态性较高的环境却不利于内部学习和外部学习的协同，只有在稳定性较低的环境中，内部学习和外部学习才能协同促进组织绩效。本研究的特点在于系统地分析组织内、外部学习及二者的交互作用更好地提升组织绩效的环境和条件，同时考虑组织内部结构和外部环境两种情境因素的作用，对组织学习理论发展做出了一定的贡献，对管理实践也有一定的启示作用。最后，对研究的局限性进行了分析，并提出未来改进和发展的方向。

关键词: 组织学习, 内部学习, 外部学习, 组织结构, 环境动态性, 组织绩效

Abstract: Based on the literature and theoretical reasoning, models and hypothesis about relationships among organizational learning (internal learning and external learning), organizational structure (mechanistic structure and organic structure), organizational environment (environmental dynamism) and performance are built from the perspective of contingency theory. With a sample of 213 Chinese companies, Hierarchical Regressions are proposed to examine the moderation. Evidence is found to be consistent with the hypotheses by showing that the impact of organizational learning, both internal learning and external learning on organizational performance are moderated by organizational structure and environmental dynamics. The higher the dynamic environment and the lower the mechanistic structure (the higher the organic structure), the more obvious the effect of organizational learning, both internal learning and external learning, on performance. It is also found that the interaction effect between internal learning and external learning on organizational performance was more significant in organic structure and stable environment. While in mechanistic and dynamic environment, internal learning and external learning don't have synergistic effect on performance. In this study, factors that influence the effect of organizational learning from both inside and outside of organizations are combined to discuss, which makes a comprehensive understanding about how to create better condition and environment for performance improvement. Chinese companies should emphasize both internal and external learning, and integrate the two learning styles by structural design and environmental recognition. Finally, the limitations of the study are analyzed and the future development direction is proposed.

Key words: organizational learning, internal learning, external learning, organizational structure, environmental dynamism, organizational performance

中图分类号:

C936

陈国权, 刘薇. 企业组织内部学习、外部学习及其协同作用对组织绩效的影响——内部结构和外部环境的调节作用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(5): 175-186.

CHEN Guo-quan, LIU Wei. Organizational Internal Learning, External learning and Organizational Performance in Corporations: The Moderating effect of Organizational Structure and Environmental Dynamism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(5): 175-186.

参考文献

[1] Hickson D J, Hinings C R, Lee C A, et al. A strategic contingencies' theory of intraorganizational power[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971,16(2):216-229.
[2] Gresov C. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1989, 34(3):431-453.
[3] Hong K K, Kim Y G. The critical success factors for ERP implementation:An organizational fit perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2002, 40(1):25-40.
[4] Jansen J J P, Vera D, Crossan M. Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation:The moderating role of environmental dynamism[J]. The Leadership Quarterly,2009, 20(1):5-18.
[5] 吴价宝, 张帅兵, 蒋娇. 组织中团队间学习环境, 学习模式与团队间学习绩效关系研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2013, 33(21):206-210.
[6] Hong J. Structuring for organizational learning[J]. Learning Organization, 1999, 6(4):173-186.
[7] 陈国权.组织与环境的关系及组织学习[J]. 管理科学学报, 2001, 4(5):39-49.
[8] 王铁男, 陈涛, 贾榕霞. 组织学习, 战略柔性对企业绩效影响的实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2010, 13(7):42-59.
[9] Bao Yongchuan, Chen Xiaoyun, Zhou K Z. External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation:Evidence from China's high-tech firms[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2012, 65(8):1226-1233.
[10] He Zilin, Wong P K. Exploration vs. exploitation:An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis[J]. Organization Science,2004, 15(4):481-494.
[11] Bierly P, Chakrabarti A. Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17(WINTER):123-135.
[12] Wong S S. Distal and local group learning:Performance trade-offs and tensions[J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(6):645-656.
[13] 孙永风, 李垣. 基于组织内部沟通与整合能力的内外部知识整合与创新[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, 13(1):56-61.
[14] 曾德明, 张运生, 陈立勇. 高新技术企业内外部学习的契合机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2003, 17(6):93-96.
[15] Xu Rui, Zhao Liankun. Impact of external learning and organizational flexibility on radical innovation[C]//Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovation & Management,Kitakyushu,Japan,November 30-December 2, 2011.
[16] Kessler E H, Bierly P E, Gopalakrishnan S. Internal vs. external learning in new product development:Effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage[J]. R&D Management, 2000, 30(3):213-224.
[17] 谢洪明, 张霞蓉, 程聪, 等.网络关系强度, 企业学习能力对技术创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(2):55-62.
[18] López-Sáez P, Navas-López J E, Martín-de-Castro G, et al. External knowledge acquisition processes in knowledge-intensive clusters[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2010, 14(5):690-707.
[19] Olson E M, Walker O C, Ruekert R W. Organizing for effective new product development:The moderating role of product innovativeness[J]. The Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(1):48-62.
[20] Burns T, Stalker G M. The management of innovation[M]. London:Tavistock,1961.
[21] Lee C L, Yang H J. Organization structure, competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance[J]. Management Accounting Research, 2011, 22(2):84-104.
[22] 陈国权.组织行为学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社,12016.
[23] Covin J G, Slevin D P. The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1988, 25(3):217-234.
[24] Martínez-León I M, Martínez-García J A. The influence of organizational structure on organizational learning[J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2011, 32(5/6):537-566.
[25] Bapuji H, Crossan M. From questions to answers:Reviewing organizational learning research[J]. Management Learning, 2004, 35(4):397-417.
[26] Simerly R L, Li Mingfang. Environmental dynamism,capital structure and performance:A theoretical integration and an empirical test[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(1):31-49.
[27] Miller D. The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1987, 8(1):55-76.
[28] Miles R E, Snow C C. Organization theory and supply chain management:An evolving research perspective[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(2):459-463.
[29] 谢言, 高山行.组织学习对企业技术创新影响的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2013,(1):11-17.
[30] De Groot T, Brownlee A L. Effect of department structure on the organizational citizenship behavior-department effectiveness relationship[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59(10):1116-1123.
[31] Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn M. The structural context of team learning:Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning[J]. Organization Science. 2012, 24(4):1120-1139.
[32] Ramezan M. Intellectual capital and organizational organic structure in knowledge society:How are these concepts related?[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2011, 31(1):88-95.
[33] Su Zhongfeng, Li Jingyu, Yang Zhiping, et al. Exploratory learning and exploitative learning in different organizational structures[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2011, 28(4):697-714.
[34] 陈国权.组织学习和学习型组织:概念, 能力模型, 测量及对绩效的影响[J]. 管理评论, 2009, 21(1):107-116.
[35] 陈建勋, 凌媛媛, 王涛. 组织结构对技术创新影响作用的实证研究[J]. 管理评论, 2011, 23(7):62-71.
[36] CourtrightJ A, Fairhurst G T, Rogers L E.Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic system[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(4):773-802.
[37] Dess G G, Robinson R B. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures:The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(3):265-273.
[38] McDougall P P, Covin J G, Robinson R B, et al. The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on newventure performance and strategy content[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(7):537-554.
[39] Podsakoff P, Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research:Problems and prospects[J]. Journal of Management,1986, 12(4):531-544.
[40] Hair Jr J F, Anderson R E, Tatham R L, et al. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.)[M]. London:Prentice Hall,1989.

企业组织内部学习、外部学习及其协同作用对组织绩效的影响——内部结构和外部环境的调节作用研究

Organizational Internal Learning, External learning and Organizational Performance in Corporations: The Moderating effect of Organizational Structure and Environmental Dynamism

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	周雄勇, 朱庆华, 许志端. 数字追溯对食品企业创新行为的影响——知识整合的中介效应和环境动态性的调节效应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(3): 186-195.
[2]	陈国权, 周琦玮. 基于二维矩阵的个体从成功和失败经历中学习的理论和实践研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 93-107.
[3]	陈国权, 吴凡. 学习迁移的系统理论:PPEE理论模型的建构和意义[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 183-196.
[4]	张徽燕, 姚秦, 吴继红, 何楠. 高绩效工作系统、组织学习能力与企业绩效的关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(5): 134-142.
[5]	张军, 许庆瑞, 张素平. 知识积累、知识激活与创新能力关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(10): 142-148.
[6]	陈国权, 张中鑫, 赵慧群. 企业环境下个人获取知识和输出知识能力对组织公民行为影响的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(3): 178-184.
[7]	廖列法, 王刊良. 网络信息不对称性、嵌入性与组织学习绩效研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(2): 174-182.
[8]	陈建勋, 张婷婷, 吴隆增. 产品模块化对组织绩效的影响：中国情境下的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(3): 121-130.
[9]	陈国权, 宁南. 组织从经验中学习：现状、问题、方向[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(1): 157-168.
[10]	廖成林, 刘学明. 供应链管理实施对组织绩效的影响分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(3): 116-124.
[11]	陈国权. 复杂变化环境下人的学习能力：概念、模型、测量及影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(1): 147-157.
[12]	闫泽涛,计雷. 关于对企业活力产生的结构性基础因素分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, (6): 123-129.
[13]	于海波, 方俐洛, 凌文辁. 我国企业学习取向的初步研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (6): 95-100.
[14]	陈国权. 人的知识来源模型以及获取和传递知识过程的管理[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (6): 86-94.
[15]	吴价宝. 组织学习能力测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (4): 73-78.