知识分布、衰减程度与产业集群创新模式的内在机制研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.12.018

中国管理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12): 186-196.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.12.018

知识分布、衰减程度与产业集群创新模式的内在机制研究

张应青^1,2, 范如国², 罗明³

1. 贵州财经大学管科学院, 贵州贵阳 550025;
2. 武汉大学经济与管理学院, 湖北武汉 430072;
3. 广西师范大学经济管理学院, 广西桂林 541004

收稿日期:2017-05-03 修回日期:2017-09-21 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2019-02-25
通讯作者: 范如国(1965-),男(汉族),湖北潜江人,武汉大学经济与管理学院教授,博士研究生导师,研究方向:产业集群演化,E-mail:rgfan@whu.edu.cn. E-mail:rgfan@whu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71271159）；国家社科重大基金资助项目（14ZDA062）；教育部人文社会科学研究专项课题（14JDGC012）

A Study on the Inner Mechanisms of Knowledge Distribution, Depreciation on Industrial Clusters' Innovation Patterns

ZHANG Ying-qing^1,2, FAN Ru-guo², LUO Ming³

1. School of Management Science, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China;
2. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China

Received:2017-05-03 Revised:2017-09-21 Online:2018-12-20 Published:2019-02-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以知识流动为研究视角，将集群创新过程中的知识溢出、吸收能力内生化，构建包含三种创新模式下的产业集群演化模型，重点分析集群知识分布和知识衰减程度与集群创新模式的内在机制及其对创新产出的影响，并进行仿真实验。研究表明：不同知识分布下，混合创新模式的创新产出表现最好，外部吸收创新模式与内部自主创新模式呈现出不同的创新产出演化路径；在外部吸收创新和混合创新模式下，均匀分布型产业集群的创新产出表现最好，集中分布型表现次之，异质分布型表现最差，而在内部自主创新模式下，集中分布型则表现最好；不同创新模式对知识衰减的敏感程度呈现阶段性差异特征。这些结论对产业集群创新和可持续发展具有很好的理论和实践指导意义。

关键词: 知识分布, 知识衰减程度, 知识溢出, 吸收能力, 集群创新模式

Abstract: It has not been fully understood what the mechanisms are responsible for industrial cluster's innovation. In this paper, to investigate the mechanisms and effects of knowledge distribution and depreciation on industrial cluster's innovation patterns, endogenous knowledge spillover willingness and absorptive capacity are cossidered from the perspective of knowledge flow. Then, a modified industrial cluster's evolutionary model is proposed, including three kinds of innovation patterns. The simulation experiment is carried out on a cluster network. The results of simulation indicate that blending innovation demonstrates the best of innovative output, and different evolutionary paths of innovative output are presented between the external absorptive innovation and internal independent innovation. And in terms of the external absorptive innovation and blending innovation, industrial cluster with evenly knowledge distribution performs the best of innovative output, followed by industrial cluster with concentrated knowledge distribution and industrial cluster with heterogeneous knowledge distribution, while in terms of internal independent innovation, the best of innovative output comes from the industrial cluster with concentrated knowledge distribution. In addition, sensitivity for knowledge depreciation shows the phased differences among three kinds of innovation patterns. The conclusions would have good theoretical and practical significance for industrial cluster's innovation and sustainable development.

Key words: knowledge distribution, knowledge depreciation, knowledge spillover, absorptive capacity, innovation patterns

中图分类号:

张应青, 范如国, 罗明. 知识分布、衰减程度与产业集群创新模式的内在机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(12): 186-196.

ZHANG Ying-qing, FAN Ru-guo, LUO Ming. A Study on the Inner Mechanisms of Knowledge Distribution, Depreciation on Industrial Clusters' Innovation Patterns[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 186-196.

参考文献

[1] 黄速建.中国产业集群创新发展报告2011-2012[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2014.

[2] 范如国,张应青,崔迎迎.基于企业适应性偏好行为的产业集群转型升级"窗口期"研究[J].商业经济与管理,2016,(2):68-79.

[3] 张华.协同创新、知识溢出的演化博弈机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(2):92-99.

[4] Wu Aiqi,Voss H. When does absorptive capacity matter for international performance of firms? Evidence from China[J].International Business Review,2015,24(2):344-351.

[5] 王建刚,吴洁.结构化能力与吸收能力的关系:基于知识视角的实证研究[J].中国管理科学, 2014,22(S1):628-635.

[6] 刘闲月,孙锐,赵大丽.网络结构对集群知识分布与企业创新的影响[J].科技管理研究,2014,22:141-144.

[7] Kim H,Park Y.Structural effects of R&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2009,36(5):8986-8992.

[8] Konno T.Knowledge spillover processes as complex networks[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2016,462(11):1207-1214.

[9] 马永红,张帆.转移企业结网策略、网络结构与知识水平[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(2):187-196.

[10] 杨皎平,侯楠,王乐.集群内知识溢出知识势能与集群创新绩效[J].管理工程学报, 2016,(3):27-35.

[11] Guan Jiancheng, Liu Na. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network:A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J]. Research Policy,2016,45(1):97-112.

[12] Fu Wenying. Knowledge spillovers and regional innovation:The case of Guangdong Province, China[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2015.

[13] 曹勇,蒋振宇,孙合林,等.知识溢出效应、创新意愿与创新能力——来自战略性新兴产业企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2016,(1):89-98.

[14] Todorova G D B. Absorptive capacity:Valuing a reconceptualization[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(3):774-786.

[15] 吴洁,彭星星,盛永祥,等.基于动态控制模型的产学研知识转移合作博弈研究[J].中国管理科学, 2017,25(3):190-196.

[16] 韩莹,陈国宏,梁娟.基于网络权力的产业集群二元式创新下知识闭环系统知识定价、收益与协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(3):68-75.

[17] Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity:A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.

[18] Savin I, Egbetokun A. Emergence of innovation networks from R&D cooperation with endogenous absorptive capacity[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2016,64(3):82-103.

[19] 唐方成,席酉民.知识转移与网络组织的动力学行为模式(Ⅱ):吸收能力与释放能力[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(9):83-89.

[20] Shi Dongmei, Zhuang Yong, Wang Binghong. Group diversity promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game[J].EPL,2010,90(5):1632-1652.

[21] 周文,陈伟,郎益夫.集群创新网络知识动态增长研究:基于过程视角[J]. 系统工程学报, 2015,30(4):431-441.

[22] Lin B W, Wu C H. How does knowledge depth moderate the performance of internal and external knowledge sourcing strategies?[J].Technovation,2010,30(11):582-589.

[23] Qian Haifeng, Acs Z J. An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship[J]. Small Business Economics,2013,40(2):185-197.

[24] Nooteboom B, Van Haverbeke W, Duysters G, et al. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Research Policy,2007,36(7):1016-1034.

[25] 黄玮强,庄新田,姚爽.集群创新合作网络的自组织演化模型及其仿真研究[J].管理学报, 2012,(10):1475-1483.

[26] Lin Min, Li Nan. Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2010,389(3):473-480.

[27] Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann J B. Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks[J].Management Science,2007,53(7):1051-1067.

[28] 王丽丽,陈国宏.供应链式产业集群技术创新博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(1):151-158.

知识分布、衰减程度与产业集群创新模式的内在机制研究

A Study on the Inner Mechanisms of Knowledge Distribution, Depreciation on Industrial Clusters' Innovation Patterns

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	赵晓阳,衣长军,廖佳. 供应链网络位置能否提升企业创新多样性水平？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 340-349.
[2]	王文华, 秦学志, 王麟. 基于逆周期缓冲机制的或有可转债研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 71-79.
[3]	张华. 协同创新、知识溢出的演化博弈机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(2): 92-99.
[4]	王娟茹, 赵嵩正, 杨瑾. 基于知识溢出和吸收能力的知识联盟动态模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (1): 107-110.
[5]	吴海滨, 李垣, 谢恩. 学习型联盟中R&D方式与最优投资水平分析——吸收能力的观点[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, (1): 117-121.
[6]	杨仕辉, 熊艳, 王红玲. 吸收能力、研发合作创新激励与补贴政策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (1): 95-100.