中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 90-101.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0268
张维月, 刘晨光, 李琳, 焦金霞
收稿日期:
2019-02-28
修回日期:
2019-10-31
出版日期:
2021-09-20
发布日期:
2021-09-20
通讯作者:
刘晨光(1974-),男(汉族),河南商丘人,西北工业大学管理学院,教授,博士,研究方向:可持续运营管理,E-mail:liuc@nwpu.edu.cn.
E-mail:liuc@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHANG Wei-yue, LIU Chen-guang, LI Lin, JIAO Jin-xia
Received:
2019-02-28
Revised:
2019-10-31
Online:
2021-09-20
Published:
2021-09-20
摘要: 由于不同企业减排成本和减排效率有所差异,将目标减排量在供应链企业间进行合理分配是顺利完成减排目标的关键。本文研究了制造商和零售商组成的两阶段供应链的既定目标减排量分配问题,考虑企业减排对产品需求有正向影响,根据制造商分配和零售商分配两种分配方式,以及制造商领导、零售商领导和垂直纳什三种渠道权力结构,构建了六种决策模型,分析分配方式和渠道权力结构对分配决策和供应链成员以及系统利润的影响。研究表明,在三种渠道权利中:由减排对需求影响大的企业进行分配,制造商和零售商会分摊减排量,由减排对需求影响小的企业进行分配,减排量全部由对方企业承担,市场需求更大;作为领导者比作为跟随者承担更多减排量;由减排对需求影响大且减排效率低的企业分配减排量,可以实现减排量在供应链企业间分摊以及系统利润最大化,由减排对需求影响小且减排效率低或略高于对方的企业分配减排量,虽然系统利润最优,但是以单个企业承担全部减排量为代价。
中图分类号:
张维月, 刘晨光, 李琳, 焦金霞. 两阶段供应链碳排放目标减排量分配研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(9): 90-101.
ZHANG Wei-yue, LIU Chen-guang, LI Lin, JIAO Jin-xia. Allocation of the Carbon Emission Abatement Target in A Two-echelon Supply Chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(9): 90-101.
[1] Solomon S, Plattner G K, Knutti R, et al. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(6):1704-1709. [2] Matthews H S, Hendrickson C, Soh D. Environmental and economic effects of E-Commerce:A case study of book publishing and retail logistics[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, 1763(1):6-12. [3] Birchall J. Walmart to set emissions goals for suppliers[N]. Financial Times, 2010-2-26. [4] Tan T, Koomen A. Where to exert abatement effort for sustainable operations considering supply chain interactions[R]. Working paper, the Beta Research School for Operations Management Logistics, 2014. [5] Vanclay J K, Shortiss J, Aulsebrook S, et al. Cu-stomer response to carbon labelling of groceries[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2011, 34(1):153-160. [6] Martin A. German car buyers' willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions[J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 113(3):679-697. [7] Yang Huixiao, Wen Bochen. Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax:Revenue-sharing versus cost-sharing[J]. Omega:The International Journal of Management Science, 2018, 78:179-191. [8] Zhang Linghong, Wang Jingguo, You Jianxin. Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2015, 241(1):63-73. [9] Liu Zugang, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012,218(3):602-613. [10] Plambeck E L. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through operations and supply chain management[J]. Energy Economics, 2012, 34(3):S64-S74. [11] 刘名武, 吴开兰, 付红, 等. 消费者低碳好下零售商主导供应链减排合作与协调[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(12):3109-3117. Liu Mingwu, Wu Kailan, Fu Hong, et al. Cooperation on carbon emission reduction in a retailer-led supply chain with consumer's low-carbon preference[J]. System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(12):3109-3117. [12] 杨惠霄, 骆建文. 碳税政策下的供应链减排决策研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(12):3092-3102. Yang Huixiao, Luo Jianwen. Emissions reduction in a supply chain with carbon tax policy[J]. System Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(12):3092-3102. [13] 龙超, 王勇. 碳税与补贴政策下三级供应链的减排合作研究[J]. 预测, 2018, 37(5):50-55. Long Chao, Wang Yong. A study on emission reduction cooperation of three-stage supply chain under carbon tax and subsidy policy[J]. Forecasting, 2018, 37(5):50-55. [14] 张汉江, 张佳雨, 赖明勇. 低碳背景下政府行为及供应链合作研发博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):57-66. Zhang Hanjiang, Zhang Jiayu, Lai Mingyong. The game analysis of the supply chain cooperative R&D and the government's behavior under the low-carbon background[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10):57-66. [15] Felipe C, Charles J C, Tarkan T, et al. Double counting in supply chain carbon footprinting[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2013, 15(4):545-558. [16] Ren Jie, Bian Yiwen, Xu Xiaoyan, et al. Allocation of product-related carbon emission abatement target in a make-to-order supply chain[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2015, 80:181-194. [17] 杜娟, 胥敬华. 基于交互式迭代算法的中国碳减排目标分配研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5):31-39. Du Juan, Xu Jinghua. A study on disaggregating China's national carbon-reduction target based on interactive iterations[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(5):31-39. [18] 李长胜, 范英, 朱磊. 基于两阶段博弈模型的钢铁行业碳强度减排机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(2):93-101. Li Changsheng, Fan Ying, Zhu Lei. The study of carbon dioxide emission intensity abatement mechanism of iron and steel industry based on two-stage game model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(2):93-101. [19] Li Jian, Piao Shengren. Research on regional synergy carbon reduction cost allocation based on cooperative game[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 781:2569-2572. [20] 叶同, 关志民, 陶瑾, 等. 考虑消费者低碳偏好和参考低碳水平效应的供应链联合减排动态优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(10):55-64. Ye Tong, Guan Zhimin, Tao Jin, et al. Dynamic optimization and coordination about joint emission reduction in a supply chain considering consumer preference to low carbon and preference low-carbon level effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017,25(10):55-64. [21] 周艳菊, 黄雨晴, 陈晓红, 等. 促进低碳产品需求的供应链减排成本分担模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7):85-93. Zhou Yanju, Huang Yuqing, Chen Xiaohong, et al. Carbon emission reduction cost-sharing model in supply chain based on improving the demand for low-carbon products[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(7):85-93. [22] Mohr L A, Webb D J. The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses[J]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2005, 39(1):121-147. [23] Ni Debing, Li Kevin W, Tang Xiaowo. Social responsibility allocation in two-echelon supply chains:Insights from wholesale price contracts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(3):1269-1279. [24] Choi S C. Price competition in a channel structure with a common retailer[J]. Marketing Science, 1991, 10(4):271-296. |
[1] | 熊强,练帅,李治文,金帅. 双边道德风险下软件供应链信息安全责任协调契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 265-274. |
[2] | 姜涛,高丽,刘露,柴旭东. 队列中的信息异构:基于口碑传播的等待制服务系统定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 123-132. |
[3] | 黄苒,胡丽琴,李梦圆. 专有关系投资、议价力与企业违约风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 11-23. |
[4] | 张艳芬,徐琪,孙中苗. 供应商竞争下考虑道德风险的平台供应链最优动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 160-170. |
[5] | 李恒宇,柴俊武. 溢出效应下制造商的直播带货策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 171-181. |
[6] | 王鹏,王要玉,王建才. 零售平台自有品牌与制造商渠道策略的竞合博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 214-224. |
[7] | 李进,刘格格,张海霞,张江华. 基于消费者绿色偏好和渠道竞争的制造商分散式入侵策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 281-290. |
[8] | 冯颖,魏敏,何文豪,张炎治. 质量信息不对称下考虑参考价格效应的灰市供应链定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 207-218. |
[9] | 李志鹏,周晓宇. 考虑消费者餍足效应的网络视频产业链最优决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 229-239. |
[10] | 马德青,王晓晴,胡劲松. 多渠道零售下考虑消费者反展厅现象的平台型供应链销售模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 133-146. |
[11] | 孙中苗,徐琪,张艳芬. 信息不对称下按需服务平台拥有不同类型代理人时的动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 241-253. |
[12] | 熊一凡. 多重行动异质网络博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 265-274. |
[13] | 赵丹,严啸宸,汪和平,李艳. 双积分政策下汽车企业合作创新演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 279-292. |
[14] | 李波,张春燕,张俊飚. 食品企业质量安全意识提升的演化博弈逻辑[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 315-324. |
[15] | 杨松,张言彩,王爱峰. 多主体参与下食品安全社会共治演化博弈稳定性[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 325-334. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|