零售商信息禀赋优势下制造商电商直销渠道决策

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2244

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 96-105.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2244

零售商信息禀赋优势下制造商电商直销渠道决策

赵骅¹, 张晗¹, 李志国²

1.重庆大学经济与工商管理学院，重庆400044；2.重庆工商大学管理科学与工程学院，重庆400067

收稿日期:2020-08-26 修回日期:2020-12-15 出版日期:2022-03-20 发布日期:2022-03-19
通讯作者: 张晗(1996-)，女(汉族)，河南南阳人，重庆大学经济与工商管理学院，博士研究生，研究方向：企业集群供应链管理，Email: zhanghan25@cqu.edu.cn. E-mail:zhanghan25@cqu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国工程院重大咨询项目(2019-ZD-CQ-5)；重庆市哲学社会科学规划研究重点项目(2018ZD05)

Manufacturer Encroachment in E-commerce Channel with Retailer’s Advantage of Information Possession

ZHAO Hua¹, ZHANG Han¹, LI Zhi-guo²

1. School of Economies and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;2. School of Management Science and Engineering, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China

Received:2020-08-26 Revised:2020-12-15 Online:2022-03-20 Published:2022-03-19
Contact: 张晗 E-mail:zhanghan25@cqu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在供应链中由于零售商相比制造商掌握更多消费者信息，能够对市场需求进行预测，因此制造商在建立直销渠道决策时往往面临着市场需求信息的不对称。本文考虑一个由单个制造商和单个零售商组成的供应链，其中零售商向制造商订购产品并销售给终端市场，制造商可能建立直销渠道将产品直接销售给消费者。通过构建制造商无入侵、对称信息下和不对称信息下制造商入侵三种情形下的博弈模型，本文分析了制造商建立直销渠道决策和零售商的订货决策。研究发现，尽管零售商具有信息禀赋优势，制造商建立直销渠道总是能够获得更多的利润，并且在信息不对称情况下制造商建立直销渠道获得的利润大于在信息对称情况下获得的利润。而零售商与之相反，在制造商掌握市场预测信息的情况下零售商的收益更高，供应链总收益在对称信息的情况下最高。进一步考虑制造商按照自身信息禀赋进行备货量决策的情况，可以得到按照自身信息禀赋与零售商同时决策时制造商建立直销渠道的利润大于信息对称和信息不对称两种情况下的利润。

关键词: 非对称信息；制造商入侵；信号博弈；订货决策

Abstract: In recent years, the rapid development of online retailing has attracted many manufacturers to establish e-commerce direct sales channel on the basis of traditional retail channel. However, in the supply chain the retailer has more consumer information than the manufacturer to predict market demand, the manufacturer often faces asymmetric demand information relative to the retailer when building direct sales channel. A supply chain composed of a manufacturer and a retailer is considered, where the retailer orders products from the manufacturer and sells to the end market, and the manufacturer has the incentive to establish direct sales channel to consumers. Three scenarios are modelled to investigate the manufacturer’s encroachment decision and the retailer's order decision, including no manufacturer encroachment scenario, manufacturer encroachment under symmetric information scenario and manufacturer encroachment under asymmetric information scenario. The results are further verified through numerical simulation.

Key words: asymmetric information; manufacturer encroachment; Signaling game; order decision

中图分类号:

F274

赵骅, 张晗, 李志国. 零售商信息禀赋优势下制造商电商直销渠道决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 96-105.

ZHAO Hua, ZHANG Han, LI Zhi-guo. Manufacturer Encroachment in E-commerce Channel with Retailer’s Advantage of Information Possession[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(3): 96-105.

参考文献

［1］郑本荣,杨超,杨珺.回收模式对制造商渠道入侵策略的影响［J］.管理科学,2019,32(3):92-105.Zheng Benrong, Yang Chao, Yang Jun. Impact of collection type on manufacturer’s channel encroachment strategy［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2019, 32(3):92-105.
［2］张翠华,李慧思.考虑产品质量差异的制造商入侵决策研究［J］.管理工程学报,2020,34(4):161-170.Zhang Cuihua, Li Huisi. Research on manufacturers encroachment decision-making considering quality difference of products［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2020, 34(4):161-170.
［3］ Huang Song, Guan Xu, Chen Yingju. Retailer information sharing with supplier encroachment［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(6): 1133-1147.
［4］ Li Zhuoxin, Gilbert S M, Lai Guoming. Supplier encroachment under asymmetric information［J］. Management Science, 2014, 60(2): 449-462.
［5］ Li Zhuoxin, Gilbert S M, Lai Guoming. Supplier encroachment as an enhancement or a hindrance to nonlinear pricing［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 24(1): 89-109.
［6］ Zhang Jianxiong, Li Sa, Zhang Shichen, et al. Manufacturer encroachment with quality decision under asymmetric demand information［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 273(1): 217-236.
［7］ Miyaoka J, Hausman W H. How improved forecasts can degrade decentralized supply chains［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(3): 547-562.
［8］ Taylor T A, Xiao Wenqiang. Does a manufacturer benefit from selling to a better-forecasting retailer?［J］. Management Science, 2010, 56(9): 1584-1598.
［9］ Jiang Baojun, Tian Lin, Xu Yifan, et al. To share or not to share: Demand forecast sharing in a distribution channel［J］. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(5):800-809.
［10］ Wang Jiao, Liu Zhibin, Zhao Ruiqing. On the interaction between asymmetric demand signal and forecast accuracy information［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 277(3): 857-874.
［11］王文隆,王成军.基于竞争型制造商创新投入的零售商需求预测信息共享研究［J］.中国管理科学,2020,28(8):127-138.Wang Wenlong, Wang Chengjun. Retailer’s demand forecasting information sharing based on competing manufacturers’ innovation investment［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(8):127-138.
［12］张盼,雷鸣宇.闭环供应链制造商需求信息分享与回收渠道设计［J］.系统工程学报,2020,35(2):232-243.Zhang Pan, Lei Mingyu. Demand information sharing of the manufacturer and reverse channel design in closed-loop supply chains［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2020, 35(2):232-243.
［13］ Jiang Baojun, Yang Bichen. Quality and pricing decisions in a market with consumer information sharing［J］. Management Science, 2019, 65(1): 272-285.
［14］ Shao Lushen, Wu Xiaole, Zhang Fuqiang. Sourcing competition under cost uncertainty and information asymmetry［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2020, 29(2): 447-461.
［15］ Anand K S, Goyal M. Strategic information management under leakage in a supply chain［J］. Management Science, 2009, 55(3): 438-452.
［16］ Yan Yingchen, Zhao Ruiqing, Lan Yanfei. Asymmetric retailers with different moving sequences: Group buying vs. individual purchasing［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 261(3): 903-917.
［17］金雁南,田林.信息不对称下供应链成员的决策顺序研究［J］.中国管理科学,2019,27(11):158-165.Jin Yannan, Tian Lin. Supply chain members’ preferences over decision sequence with information asymmetry［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(11):158-165.
［18］ Arya A, Mittendorf B, Sappington D E M. The bright side of supplier encroachment［J］. Marketing Science, 2007, 26(5):651-659.
［19］ Guan Huiqi, Gurnani H, Geng Xin, et al. Strategic inventory and supplier encroachment［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2019, 21(3):536-555.
［20］ Albert H, Long Xiaoyang, Javad N. Quality in supply chain encroachment［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2016, 18(2):280-298.
［21］ Iyer G, Narasimhan C, Niraj R. Information and inventory in distribution channels［J］. Management Science, 2007, 53(10):1551–1561.
［22］ Roberts M J. Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis［J］. Econometrica, 1982, 50(2): 443-459.
［23］ Vives X. Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and bertrand［J］. Journal of Economic Theory, 1984, 34(1): 71-94.
［24］ Fein A J, Anderson E. Patterns of credible commitments: territory and brand selectivity in industrial distribution channels［J］. Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(2): 19-34.
［25］ Liu Yunchuan, Zhang Z J. Research note—The benefits of personalized pricing in a channel［J］. Marketing Science, 2006, 25(1): 97-105.

[1]	张子元,裔士明,于丽英. 基于顾客价值的双渠道供应链合作增值服务决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 203-213.
[2]	郭福利,陈菊红,马歆,王萍. 考虑不确定性的多级产品服务供应链网络均衡研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 194-202.
[3]	李勇,陈元,于辉. 缓解牛鞭效应的新途径：人机协同的智慧决策机器人[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 113-120.
[4]	章魏,周群凯,鲍丽娜. 负债与有限责任下的价格产量联合决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 154-159.
[5]	兰建义,时启超,冯中伟,赫蒙蒙. 生鲜电商供应链企业社会责任分担策略选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 201-213.
[6]	余乐安,王丹萍,曾能民. 突发事件风险下的供应链重构策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 93-100.
[7]	孙文婷,彭红军. 电商助农背景下农产品生产与销售策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 181-189.
[8]	李宗活,李善良,陈祥锋,胡淼. 考虑消费者时间价值的平台供应链即时零售引入策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 225-235.
[9]	张川,田雨鑫,崔梦雨. 电动汽车动力电池制造商混合渠道回收模式选择与碳减排决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 184-195.
[10]	李锋,王倩妮. 双寡头竞争环境下迭代产品上市时间和定价问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 240-254.
[11]	石松,石平. 疫情背景下考虑社会学习的竞争防疫产品供应中断研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 171-178.
[12]	马勇,张翠华,李春雨,李志堂. 匹配不确定下考虑展厅现象的电子零售商渠道竞争策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 153-163.
[13]	郭松波,艾兴政,钟丽,唐华. 非对称零售商药品带量采购的团购协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 208-217.
[14]	金力,徐和,周品. 考虑副产品入侵的制造商废料处理策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 218-226.
[15]	周永务,李斐,刘婕. 不同成本分担契约对产品定价、质量和售后服务的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(3): 156-166.

零售商信息禀赋优势下制造商电商直销渠道决策

Manufacturer Encroachment in E-commerce Channel with Retailer’s Advantage of Information Possession

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0