资产配置中投资者风险偏好的量化——兼论长短期风险偏好的关联

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1827

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 11-21.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1827

资产配置中投资者风险偏好的量化——兼论长短期风险偏好的关联

杨朝军¹, 周仕盈¹, ², 丁专鑫³, 马征程¹

1.上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院，上海200030；兴银理财有限责任公司，上海200120；3.Wells Fargo Asset Management，Los Angeles 90001

收稿日期:2019-11-12 修回日期:2020-03-24 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-24
通讯作者: 杨朝军(1960-),男(汉族)，江苏宜兴人，上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院，教授，博士生导师，证券金融研究所，所长，研究方向：金融市场与金融投资分析，Email：chaojunyang@sjtu.edu.cn. E-mail:chaojunyang@sjtu.edu.cn

Quantification of Investor’s Long-term and Short-term Risk Appetite in Asset Allocation

YANG Chao-jun¹, ZHOU Shi-ying^1,2, DING Zhuan-xin³, MA Zheng-cheng¹

1. Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China;2. China Industrial Bank Wealth Management, Shanghai 200120, China;3. Wells Fargo Asset Management，Los Angeles 90001, USA

Received:2019-11-12 Revised:2020-03-24 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: 杨朝军 E-mail:chaojunyang@sjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 投资者风险偏好的量化是资产配置决策的关键步骤之一。常见的量化指标是风险厌恶系数，由于其取值较难确定，现代投资组合理论中也常用投资者最大可承受标准差对投资者的风险偏好进行衡量。文章介绍了获取风险厌恶系数的一种有效方法，一定程度上解决了资产配置中风险厌恶系数取值难的问题，并首次提出了以最大可承受标准差作为风险约束的时变性问题，有助于资产配置理论与实践的有机结合。在此基础上，考虑到资产配置的投资期限通常较长，本文对长短期风险厌恶系数之间的关联进行了研究。

关键词: 资产配置；风险偏好；风险厌恶系数；投资期限

Abstract: The quantification of investors’ risk appetite is one of the key steps in asset allocation. The article attempts to introduce an efficient method to measure the risk appetite from a new perspective. As more and more previous studies have shown, investors’ risk appetite, often measured by the risk aversion coefficient, is not a constant value. Thus it is of great significance to measure the risk appetite accurately in the investment process. In the Expected Utility Theory, the risk aversion coefficient is the quantification of risk appetite. In the Modern Portfolio Theory, however, the investors’ risk appetite is often measured by the maximum tolerable standard deviation, this is because the former can be difficult to be precisely valued. The relationship between the risk aversion coefficient and the maximum tolerable standard deviation for different types of investors is studied through mathematical derivation. Considering the long investment horizon in asset allocation, the inner relationship between long-term and short-term risk appetite is also studied.

Key words: asset allocation； risk appetite； risk aversion coefficient； investment horizon

中图分类号:

F830.2

杨朝军, 周仕盈, , 丁专鑫, 马征程. 资产配置中投资者风险偏好的量化——兼论长短期风险偏好的关联[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 11-21.

YANG Chao-jun, ZHOU Shi-ying, DING Zhuan-xin, MA Zheng-cheng. Quantification of Investor’s Long-term and Short-term Risk Appetite in Asset Allocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 11-21.

参考文献

［1］ Chiappori A, Paiella M. Relative risk aversion is constant: Evidence from panel data［J］ Journal of the European Economic Association, 2011,9(6):1021-1052.
［2］ Bucciol A, Miniaci R, Pastorello S. Return expectations and risk aversion heterogeneity in household portfolios［J］. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2017, 40: 201-219.
［3］ Jianakoplos A, Bernasek A. Are women more risk averse?［J］. Economic Inquiry, 1998,36(4):620-630.
［4］ Guiso L, Paiella M. Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk［J］. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2008,6(6), pp. 1109-1150.
［5］ Gollier C, Pratt W. Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk［J］. Econometrica, 1996,64(5): 1109-1123.
［6］ Berkowitz K, Qiu J.A further look at household portfolio choice and health status［J］. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2006, 30(4): 1201-1217.
［7］王晟, 蔡明超. 中国居民风险厌恶系数测定及影响因素分析——基于中国居民投资行为数据的实证研究［J］. 金融研究, 2011,425(8):192-206.Wang Cheng, Cai Mingchao. Measurement and analysis of Chinese residents’ coefficient of risk aversion: An empirical study based on data from survey［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2011,425(8):192-206.
［8］张光利，刘小元. 住房价格与居民风险偏好［J］. 经济研究, 2018, 1:110-123.Zhang Guangli, Liu Xiaoyuan. Housing price and residents’ risk preference［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 1:110-123.
［9］ Alexander J, Baptista M, Yan S. Portfolio selection with mental accounts: An equilibrium model with endogenous risk aversion［J］. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2020, 110: 105599.
［10］ Das S, Markowitz H, Scheid J, et al. Portfolio optimization with mental accounts［J］. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2010, 45(2):311-334.
［11］ Jeon J, Park K. Optimal retirement and portfolio selection with consumption ratcheting［J］. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2020, 14(2): 1-45.
［12］ Weber E. Interest rates, inflation, and consumer expenditures［J］. American Economic Review, 1975, 65(5):843-58.
［13］ Mankiw G. Consumer durables and the real interest rate［J］. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1985, 67(3):353-362
［14］ Riley B, Chow V. Asset allocation and individual risk aversion［J］. Financial Analysts Journal, 1992,48(6): 32-37.
［15］ Kimball S, Sahm R, Shapiro D. Risk preferences in the PSID: Individual imputations and family covariation［J］. American Economic Review, 2009, 99(2): 363-368.
［16］ Bucciol A, Miniaci R. Household portfolios and implicit risk preference［J］. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2011,93(4): 1235-1250.
［17］张琳琬, 吴卫星. 风险态度与居民财富——来自中国微观调查的新探究［J］. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4):119-131.Zhang Linwan, Wu Weixing. Risk appetite and Residents’ Wealth: A New Study Base on Survey［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 430(4):119-131.
［18］ Cederburg S, O’Doherty S. Understanding the risk-return relation: The aggregate wealth proxy actually matters［J］. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2019, 37(4): 721-735.
［19］ Friend I, Blume E. The demand for risky assets［J］. American Economic Reviews, 1975,65(5): 900-922.
［20］ Thaler H, Johnson J. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice［J］. Management Science, 1990, 36(6):643-660.
［21］ Pirvu T, Zhang H. Utility indifference pricing: A time consistent approach［J］. Applied Mathematical Finance, 2013, 20(4):304-326.
［22］ Kwak M, Pirvu T, Zhang H. A multiperiod equilibrium pricing model［J］. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014:1-14.
［23］ Delong . Optimal investment for insurance company with exponential utility and wealth-dependent risk aversion coefficient［J］. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2019, 89(1): 73-113.
［24］ Park K, Jeon J. Finite-horizon optimal consumption and investment problem with a preference change［J］. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2019, 472(2): 1777-1802.
［25］吴鑫育, 赵凯, 李心丹, 等. 时变风险厌恶下的期权定价——基于上证50ETF期权的实证研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11):12-22.Wu Xinyu, Zhao Kai, Li Xindan, et al. Option price under time-varying risk aversion: An empirical study based on SSE 50 ETF option［J］ Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(11):12-22.
［26］ Markowitz H. Portfolio selection［J］. Theory & Practice of Investment Management Asset Allocation Valuation Portfolio Construction & Strategies Second Edition, 1952, 7(1):77-91.
［27］ Sharpe F. A simplified model for portfolio analysis［J］. Management Science, 1963, 9(2):277-293.
［28］ Merton R C. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time Case［J］. Review of Economics & Statistics, 1969, 51(3):247-257.
［29］周仕盈. 长短期资产配置理论与实证问题研究［D］.上海:上海交通大学,2019.Zhou Shiying. Theoretical and empirical research on long-term and short-term asset allocation［D］. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University,2019.

[1]	陈艺云,陈曼莲. 定性文本信息与信用评级：基于年报文本分析的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 94-104.
[2]	陈庭强, 王杰朋, 杨晓光. 双层耦合网络下CRT市场交易对手信用风险传染演化模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(4): 260-274.
[3]	赵大萍, 柏林, 房勇, 汪寿阳. 基于投资者观点的鲁棒性投资组合选择模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 1-9.
[4]	朱光伟, 杨涛, 杜在超. 融资融券约束与股市波动[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 13-29.
[5]	闫妍, 李博. 付费主体差异对信用评级结果的影响机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 1-11.
[6]	张红伟, 陈小辉, 文佳, 吴永超. 发展不平衡视角下地方监管沙盒竞争的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 211-221.
[7]	陈艺云. 基于信息披露文本的上市公司财务困境预测:以中文年报管理层讨论与分析为样本的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 23-34.
[8]	刘星, 蒋水全. 银行股权关联、银行业竞争与民营企业融资约束[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 1-10.
[9]	林宇, 陈王, 王一鸣, 黄迅. 典型事实、混合Copula函数与金融市场相依结构研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(4): 20-29.
[10]	李研妮, 冉茂盛. 商业银行流动性风险管理方法的改进研究——基于模糊定性约束下的动态规划补偿模型应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 19-25.
[11]	郝颖, 刘星, 林朝南. 我国上市公司高管人员过度自信与投资决策的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (5): 142-148.
[12]	王艳, 孙培源, 杨忠直. 经理层过度投资与股权激励的契约模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (1): 127-131.
[13]	邹辉文, 陈德棉. 现代消费者行为的动态系统分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (3): 91-96.

资产配置中投资者风险偏好的量化——兼论长短期风险偏好的关联

Quantification of Investor’s Long-term and Short-term Risk Appetite in Asset Allocation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0