考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1242

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 265-276.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1242

考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型

李芮萌¹, 杨乃定², 刘慧³, 张延禄²

1.重庆邮电大学经济管理学院，重庆400065； 2.西北工业大学管理学院，陕西西安710129；3.中南大学商学院，湖南长沙410083

收稿日期:2020-06-30 修回日期:2020-11-08 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-10-12
通讯作者: 杨乃定（1964-），男(汉族)，陕西西安人，西北工业大学管理学院，教授、博士生导师，研究方向：管理系统工程、项目管理、应急管理等，Email：naidingy@nwpu.edu.cn. E-mail:naidingy@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71871182)；教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目资助(20XJA630003)；中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2021M700560)；重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(cstc2021jcyj-bsh0215)；重庆邮电大学人才引进基金资助项目(E012K2020209)

Design Change Risk Propagation for Complex Product Development Projects Considering Organizational Failure and Cooperation

LI Rui-meng¹, YANG Nai-ding², LIU Hui³, ZHANG Yan-lu²

1. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China;2. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China;3. Business school, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received:2020-06-30 Revised:2020-11-08 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-10-12
Contact: 杨乃定 E-mail:naidingy@nwpu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于产品部件间的设计关联和组织产品间的镜像假设，构建一对一依赖的复杂产品研发项目组织-产品相依网络模型。在此基础上，构建考虑组织失效和组织间协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播动力学模型，并针对由少数部件发生设计变更风险事件引发的复杂产品研发项目相依网络上的设计变更风险传播进行数值仿真。结果表明：组织失效和组织协调不足均会导致设计变更风险的积累，使得设计变更风险传播经历缓慢传播、失控传播后达到相对稳定状态；组织设计能力充足且组织间协调充分时设计变更风险传播不发生。复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播受到部件设计变更风险容量的显著影响，存在设计变更风险传播阈值η*3使得设计变更风险传播不发生；传播阈值η*3与初始变更源规模正相关；研发组织的冗余设计能力存在作用条件，使得传播阈值η*3保持在最低水平。研究成果完善了项目管理中风险动态分析框架，为提高复杂产品研发项目抵御设计变更风险的能力提供建议。

关键词: 复杂产品研发项目；设计变更风险；风险传播；组织失效；组织协调

Abstract: Influenced by internal and external risk factors such as customer demand uncertainty, technological change, scheme error, a small number of components are prone to design change risk events. In the context of complex inter-component dependency and concurrent development, the design change of one or a few components may trigger the potential design change risk of other dependent components, resulting in design change risk propagation. The propagation of design change risk brings great uncertainty to complex product development (CPD), which may lead to serious project delay, budget overrun, and low quality. Complex products contain a large number of components, which cannot be independently developed by a single organization. Therefore, CPD projects mainly adopt the form of multi-organizational collaboration network. Although networked form has the advantages of reducing the cost of development and realizing complementary resources, it further increases the complexity of design change risk management in the face of design change propagation, which poses a great challenge to the CPD projects. Therefore, it is of great significance to consider the role of organizations and reveal the propagation law of design change risk under the influences of organizations.

Key words: complex product development project; design change risk; risk propagation; organizational failure; organizational cooperation

中图分类号:

F224

李芮萌, 杨乃定, 刘慧, 张延禄. 考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 265-276.

LI Rui-meng, YANG Nai-ding, LIU Hui, ZHANG Yan-lu. Design Change Risk Propagation for Complex Product Development Projects Considering Organizational Failure and Cooperation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 265-276.

参考文献

［1］ Hobday M. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation［J］. Research Policy, 1998, 26(6): 689-710.
［2］陈占夺, 齐丽云, 牟莉莉. 价值网络视角的复杂产品系统企业竞争优势研究——一个双案例的探索性研究［J］.管理世界, 2013(10): 156-169.Chen Zhanduo, Qi Liyun, Mou Lili. Competitive advantage of complex product system enterprises from the perspective of value network—an exploratory study of two cases［J］. Journal of Management World, 2013(10): 156-169.
［3］ Shankar P, Morkos B, Summers J D. Reasons for change propagation: A case study in an automotive OEM［J］. Research in Engineering Design, 2012, 23(4): 291-303.
［4］ Li Ruimeng, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Risk propagation and mitigation of design change for complex product development (CPD) projects based on multilayer network theory［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 142: 106370.
［5］杨乃定, 李芮萌, 张延禄等. 复杂产品研发项目技术风险扩散建模与仿真［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(6): 1496-1506.Yang Naiding, Li Ruimeng, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Modeling and simulation of technical risk diffusion in the complex product research and development projects［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(6): 1496-1506.
［6］王京北, 杨乃定, 张延禄等. 基于CA模型的研发网络级联失效建模及其对任务网络工期风险的影响研究［J］. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(4): 176-183.Wang Jingbei, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Modeling of R&D network’s cascading failure based on CA model and its impact on the duration risk of task network［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019, 33(4): 176-183.
［7］杨乃定, 刘慧, 张延禄等. 考虑项目关联关系的R&D网络风险传播建模与仿真［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 179-188.Yang Naiding, Liu Hui, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Risk propagation modeling and simulation in R&D network considering the interrelation between projects［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(10): 179-188.
［8］刘慧, 杨乃定, 张延禄等. 考虑风险感知和项目关联的R&D网络风险传播模型［J］. 系统工程学报, 2019, 34(3): 301-311.Liu Hui, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Risk propagation model of R&D network considering risk perceptionand project interrelation［J］.Journal of Systems Engineering, 2019, 34(3): 301-311.
［9］ Clarkson P J, Simons C, Eckert C. Predicting change propagation in complex design［J］. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2004, 126(5): 788-797.
［10］ Lee J, Hong Y S. Data-driven prediction of change propagation using dependency network［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 70: 149-158.
［11］ Lee J, Hong Y S. Bayesian network approach to change propagation analysis［J］. Research in engineering design, 2017, 28(4): 437-455.
［12］ Pasqual M C, de Weck O L. Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation［J］. Research in engineering design, 2012, 23(4): 305-328.
［13］ Lee H, Seol H, Sung N, et al. An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products［J］. Journal of Engineering Design, 2007, 21(1): 75-91.
［14］ Hamraz B, Caldwell N H M, Clarkson P J. A holistic categorization framework for literature on engineering change management［J］. Systems Engineering, 2013, 16(4): 473-505.
［15］ Qiao Hu, Mo Rong, Xiang Ying. The generation of adaptive assembly from predicting change propagation［J］. Assembly Automation, 2015, 35 (3):269-80.
［16］ Haynes J. Risk as an economic factor［J］. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1895, 9(4): 409-449.
［17］ Cheng Hui, Chu Xuening. A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product［J］. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, 23(4): 1419-1431.
［18］ Wang Jingbei, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Modeling and simulation of the cascading failure of R&D network considering the community structure［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 522: 43-53.
［19］ Li Yupeng, Chu Xuening, Chu Dexin, et al. An integrated module partition approach for complex products and systems based on weighted complex networks［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52 (15):4608-4622.
［20］ Zhang Yanlu, Yang Naiding. Vulnerability analysis of interdependent R&D networks under risk cascading propagation［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, 505: 1056-1068.
［21］ Zhang Yanlu, Yang Naiding. Development of a mitigation strategy against the cascading propagation of risk in R&D network［J］. Safety science, 2014, 68: 161-168.
［22］ Liu Hui, Yang Naiding, Yang Zhao, et al. The impact of firm heterogeneity and awareness in modeling risk propagation on multiplex networks［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 539: 122919.
［23］ Colfer L, Baldwin C Y. The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions［J］. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2016, 25(5): 709-738.
［24］ Sosa M E, Eppinger S D, Rowles C M.The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development［J］. Management science, 2004, 50(12): 1674-1689.
［25］ Gokpinar B, Hopp W J, Iravani S M. The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development［J］. Management science, 2010, 56(3): 468-484.
［26］ Li C, Maini P K. An evolving network model with community structure［J］. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 2005, 38(45): 9741-9749.
［27］李玉鹏, 李孟泽, 王召同. 基于有向加权网络模型的复杂产品多源设计变更传播路径优化［J］. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(6): 213-222.Li Yupeng, Li Mengze, Wang Zhaotong.Multi-source design change propagation path optimization for complex product based on weighted and directed network model［J］.Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(6): 213-222.

[1]	熊强,练帅,李治文,金帅. 双边道德风险下软件供应链信息安全责任协调契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 265-274.
[2]	姜涛,高丽,刘露,柴旭东. 队列中的信息异构：基于口碑传播的等待制服务系统定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(10): 123-132.
[3]	黄苒,胡丽琴,李梦圆. 专有关系投资、议价力与企业违约风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 11-23.
[4]	张艳芬,徐琪,孙中苗. 供应商竞争下考虑道德风险的平台供应链最优动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 160-170.
[5]	李恒宇,柴俊武. 溢出效应下制造商的直播带货策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 171-181.
[6]	王鹏,王要玉,王建才. 零售平台自有品牌与制造商渠道策略的竞合博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(9): 214-224.
[7]	李进,刘格格,张海霞,张江华. 基于消费者绿色偏好和渠道竞争的制造商分散式入侵策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(7): 281-290.
[8]	冯颖,魏敏,何文豪,张炎治. 质量信息不对称下考虑参考价格效应的灰市供应链定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 207-218.
[9]	李志鹏,周晓宇. 考虑消费者餍足效应的网络视频产业链最优决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 229-239.
[10]	马德青,王晓晴,胡劲松. 多渠道零售下考虑消费者反展厅现象的平台型供应链销售模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 133-146.
[11]	孙中苗,徐琪,张艳芬. 信息不对称下按需服务平台拥有不同类型代理人时的动态激励契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 241-253.
[12]	熊一凡. 多重行动异质网络博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 265-274.
[13]	赵丹,严啸宸,汪和平,李艳. 双积分政策下汽车企业合作创新演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 279-292.
[14]	李波,张春燕,张俊飚. 食品企业质量安全意识提升的演化博弈逻辑[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 315-324.
[15]	杨松,张言彩,王爱峰. 多主体参与下食品安全社会共治演化博弈稳定性[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(4): 325-334.

考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型

Design Change Risk Propagation for Complex Product Development Projects Considering Organizational Failure and Cooperation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0