双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发微分博弈模型研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0321

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 255-265.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0321

双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发微分博弈模型研究

郑月龙¹, ², 周冰洁¹, 白春光², 蔡琴¹

1.重庆工商大学工商管理学院，重庆400067； 2.电子科技大学经济与管理学院，四川成都611731

收稿日期:2022-02-21 修回日期:2022-08-12 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-19
通讯作者: 白春光(1977-)，女(汉族)，辽宁抚顺人，电子科技大学经济与管理学院，教授，博士生导师，博士，研究方向：可持续供应链管理、区块链、决策支持，Email:Cbai@uestc.edu.cn. E-mail:Cbai@uestc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助一般项目(20BJY005)

Differential Game Model of the Cross-organizational Cooperative R&D of General Purpose Technologies under Two-way Collaboration

ZHENG Yue-long¹, ², ZHOU Bing-jie¹, BAI Chun-guang², CAI Qin¹

1. School of Business Administration, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China; 2. School of Management and Economic, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

Received:2022-02-21 Revised:2022-08-12 Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-19
Contact: 白春光 E-mail:Cbai@uestc.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为解析共性技术跨组织合作研发模型选择及影响因素，在横纵双向协同下以高校和科研院所以及龙头企业为承担主体，运用微分博弈理论建立共性技术跨组织合作研发基准模型、产出依赖模型及努力依赖模型。研究发现：就双向协同系数而言，增加横向协同系数能提高三种模型下努力水平及研发总利润；纵向协同系数在边际收益系数较大时，对研发总利润产生先减后增的影响；双向协同系数均在努力依赖模型中最为敏感。就模型比较而言，产出依赖模型优于基准模型，固定监控成本作为调节变量，随其减小努力依赖模型将优于基准模型甚而优于产出依赖模型。就政府作用机制而言，政府应通过补贴和非补贴方式参与共性技术研发，产出依赖模型中政府须对双方给予补贴，努力依赖模型中政府须对高校和研究院所给予全额补贴。

关键词: 产业共性技术；跨组织合作研发；双向协同；微分博弈

Abstract: Under the background of the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, the innovation and breakthrough of General Purpose Technologies (GPTs), such as Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Blockchain technology, have become an important opportunity for the country to occupy the commanding point in international competition. Due to GPTs R&D needs to deal with the dual uncertainties of technology and market, which makes the R&D motivation of a single enterprise insufficient, and requires organizations with different advantages to conduct cross-organizational cooperative R&D.

Key words: GPTs; cross-organizational cooperative R&D; two-way collaboration; differential game

中图分类号:

郑月龙, 周冰洁, 白春光, 蔡琴. 双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发微分博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 255-265.

ZHENG Yue-long, ZHOU Bing-jie, BAI Chun-guang, CAI Qin. Differential Game Model of the Cross-organizational Cooperative R&D of General Purpose Technologies under Two-way Collaboration[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 255-265.

参考文献

［1］ Coccia M. The source and nature of general purpose technologies for supporting next K-waves: global leadership and the case study of the U.S. Navy’s Mobile User Objective System［J］. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017(116): 331-339.
［2］ Bresnahan T F, Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’?［J］. Journal of Econometrics, 1995,65(1): 83-108.
［3］ Strohmaier R, Rainer A. Studying general purpose technologies in a multi-sector framework:the case of ICT in Denmark［J］. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2016(36): 34-49．
［4］前瞻产业研究院. 2021年中国集成电路制造行业市场现状及发展趋势分析［EB/OL］. ［2021-11-03］. https://bg.qianzhan.com/trends/detail/506/211103-9e5cc11a.html.Prospective Industry Research Institute. Analysis of the market status and development trend of China’s integrated circuit manufacturing industry in 2021［EB/OL］. ［2021-11-03］. https://bg.qianzhan.com/trends/detail/506/211103-9e5cc11a.html.
［5］ Tassey G. Modeling and measuring the economic roles of technology infrastructure［J］. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2008, 17(7-8): 615-629.
［6］ Kokshagina O, Gillier T, Cogez P, et al. Using innovation contests to promote the development of generic technologies［J］. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2017 (114): 152-164.
［7］ Klinger J, Mateos-Garcia J, Stathoulopoulos K. Deep learning, deep change? Mapping the evolution and geography of a general purpose technology［J］. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(7): 5589-5621.
［8］郑月龙,任毅. 技术链视角下产业共性技术供给模式选择研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(4): 915-932.Zheng Yuelong, Ren Yi. Research on the selection of industrial generic technology supply mode from the perspective of technology chain［J］. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2020, 40(4): 915-932.
［9］郑月龙,秦国静. 政府补贴对产业共性技术可持续研发行为的影响研究［J］. 研究与发展管理, 2021, 33(3): 121-145.Zheng Yuelong, Qin Guojing. The impact of government subsidies on industrial generic technology sustainable R&D behavior［J］. R&D Management， 2021, 33(3): 121-145.
［10］ Hooge S, Kokshagina O, Masson P L,et al. Designing generic technologies in energy research: learning from two CEA technologies for double unknown management［C］//Proceedings of the European Academy of Management 14th Annual Conference, Valencia, Spain, June 4-7, 2014.
［11］ awniczuk K, Augustin L M, Grote N, et al. Open access to technology platforms for InP-based photonic integrated circuits［J］. Advanced Optical Technologies, 2015, 4(2): 157-165.
［12］郑月龙,白春光,李登峰. 考虑市场化开发的产业共性技术供给决策研究［J/OL］. 中国管理科学:1-12［2022-02-20］.DOI:10.16381 /j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0124.Zheng Yuelong, Bai Chunguang, Li Dengfeng. Research on the decision-making of industrial generic technology supply considering market-oriented development ［J/OL］. Chinese Journal of Management Science: 1-12 ［2022-02-20］.DOI:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0124.
［13］张衍芳,凌海英. 中小企业共性技术供给的“盲点”困境及破解：一项案例研究［J］. 科研管理, 2019, 40(8): 215-223.Zhang Yanfang, Ling Haiying. The ‘blind spot’' dilemma and solution of generic technology supply for SMEs： a case study［J］. Research management, 2019, 40(8): 215-223.
［14］ Wang Fenglian, Xie Rongjian, Hu Wengting. The influencing factors and promotion countermeasures of industrial generic technology diffusion based on differential game［J］. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(17): 1-12.
［15］ Czarnitzki D, Hanel P, Rosa J M. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: a microeconometric study on Canadian firms［J］. Research Policy, 2011, 40(2): 217-229.
［16］ Pilinkiene V. R&D investment and competitiveness in the Baltic States［J］. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015 (213): 154-160.
［17］陈朝月,许治.政府R&D资助政策对企业共性技术项目决策的影响探究［J］.管理评论,2019,31(9): 70-80.Chen Chaoyue, Xu Zhi. Research on the influence of government R&D funding policy on the decision-making of generic technology projects in enterprises［J］. Management Review, 2019, 31(9): 70-80.
［18］ Giovanni P D. Environmental collaboration in a closed loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract［J］. Annals of Operations Research, 2014, 220(1): 135-157.
［19］ Chen Jiguang, Hu Qiying, Song Jingsheng. Supply chain models with mutual commitments and implications for social responsibility［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(7): 1268-1283.
［20］马永红,刘海礁,柳清. 产业共性技术产学研协同研发策略的微分博弈研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 197-207.Ma Yonghong, Liu Haijiao, Liu Qing. Differential game research on industry-university-research collaborative R&D strategy of industrial generic technology［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(12): 197-207.
［21］ Demirezen E M, Kumar S, Shetty B. Managing Co-Creation in information technology projects: a differential games approach［J］. Information Systems Research, 2016, 27(3): 517-537.
［22］ Atasu A, Subramanian R. Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: individual or collective producer responsibility［J］. Production and Operations Management, 2012, 21(6): 1042-1059.
［23］ Ranjan A, Jha J K. Pricing and coordination strategies of a dual-channel supply chain considering green quality and sales effort［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019(218): 409-424.
［24］ Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M. Patents, citations, and innovations: a window on the knowledge economy［M］. Cambridge:The MIT Press, 2005.
［25］ Manasakis C, Petrakis E, Zikos V. Downstream research joint venture with upstream market power［J］. Southern Economic Journal, 2015, 80(3): 782-802.
［26］于娱,施琴芬. 产学研协同创新中知识共享的微分对策模型［J］. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S2): 684-690.Yu Yu, Shi Qinfen. A differential game model of knowledge sharing in collaborative innovation of industry-university-research institute［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(S2): 684-690.
［27］ Qiu Ranfeng. Cantwell J. General purpose technologies and local knowledge accumulation: a study on MNC subunits and local innovation centers［J］. International Business Review, 2018(27): 826-837.
［28］ Chen J Y, Stan D, Hubert P. The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation［J］. Omega, 2019(86): 42-58.

[1]	张华,顾新. 供应链竞争下制造商数字化转型的博弈均衡研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 163-172.
[2]	杨乃定,王郁,王琰,张延禄. 复杂产品研发网络中企业技术创新行为动态演化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(2): 242-253.
[3]	孙国强,谢雨菲. 区块链技术、供应链网络与数据共享：基于演化博弈视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 149-162.
[4]	杨振华,孙正捷,刘茹,郭鹏举. 企业承担SR对技术授权与产品定价的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(10): 193-204.
[5]	晏文隽, 王小雪, 李德鸿, 郭菊娥. 技术垄断条件下关键核心技术合作创新的演化稳定策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(7): 227-236.
[6]	卢超, 邢窈窈, 蒋璐. 责任式创新的多主体演化博弈研究——以新冠疫苗研发为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 226-237.
[7]	解学梅, 朱琪玮. 创新支点还是保守枷锁：绿色供应链管理实践如何撬动企业绩效？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 131-143.
[8]	张华, 顾新, 王涛. 知识链视角下开放式创新主体的联盟策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 263-274.
[9]	宋杰珍, 常健聪. 考虑道德风险与货损追溯的物流货损控制合约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 168-178.
[10]	海江涛, 李旭. 需求不确定情况下绿色产品消费过程中政府的最优补贴[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 180-189.
[11]	苏媛, 李广培. 绿色技术创新能力、产品差异化与企业竞争力——基于节能环保产业上市公司的分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 46-56.
[12]	甘柳, 罗鹏飞, 杨招军. 运营滞后与信用担保互换下的项目投资决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 22-32.
[13]	鄢仁秀, 汪贤裕. 零售商主导型供应链中的知情委托方赊销契约机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 85-93.
[14]	曹裕, 李青松, 李业梅. 技术贸易壁垒对食品企业技术选择决策影响的博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(8): 184-196.
[15]	宋杰珍, 黄有方, 谷金蔚. 信息对称与非对称环境下基于补偿合约的物流能力协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 71-81.

双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发微分博弈模型研究

Differential Game Model of the Cross-organizational Cooperative R&D of General Purpose Technologies under Two-way Collaboration

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0