主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 170-181.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0651

• • 上一篇    

智慧平台供应链的在线助农模式和融资策略研究

牟宗玉(),杨晓霞,李珂,张桂涛   

  1. 青岛大学商学院,山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-02 修回日期:2021-11-04 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-08-29
  • 通讯作者: 牟宗玉 E-mail:mzydragon@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(RZ2400000499);山东省部级自然科学项目(RZ2300000298)

Online Assisting Farmers Mode and Financing Strategy of Smart Platform Supply Chain

Zongyu Mu(),Xiaoxia Yang,Ke Li,Guitao Zhang   

  1. School of Business,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,China
  • Received:2021-04-02 Revised:2021-11-04 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-08-29
  • Contact: Zongyu Mu E-mail:mzydragon@163.com

摘要:

智慧平台具备销售途径广泛和融资方式便捷等优势,可助力国家乡村振兴任务的早日达成。本文考虑贫困农户普遍面临生产资金短缺,而平台可提供融资帮助,构建“农户+智慧平台”“农户+批发商+智慧平台”和“农户+农村合作社+智慧平台”等助农模式供应链的决策模型。研究发现:(1)农户贫困程度和消费者助农偏好增加时,农产品的市场需求量增加,这会提升智慧平台供应链中各成员的利润,智慧服务水平的提升有助于扩大农产品的市场需求量,进而有利于农户、批发商和农村合作社获取更多的利润,但平台因投入智慧成本增加会使其利润减少,有息贷款时,农户的利润会随着利率增加而减少,而平台的利润会随着利率增加而增加。(2)在“农户+智慧平台”直销助农模式下,因可避免双重边际加价问题,农户和智慧平台均能获得最多的利润,但现实中贫困农户因条件的限制,很难在平台上直销农产品,所以该模式较难实现,此时农户选择与农村合作社合作来帮助其分担生产成本,可获得较多的利润,故此时“农户+农村合作社+智慧平台”助农模式的富裕效果会更好。(3)在三种智慧平台助农模式下,农户通过无息贷款可获得更高的利润,而智慧平台通过有息贷款可获得更高的利润,此时政府可通过设计合理的补贴政策,激励智慧平台在融资策略上和农户期望的无息贷款达成一致的同时,提升智慧服务水平。

关键词: 智慧供应链, 助农富裕, 在线融资, 政府补贴

Abstract:

The smart platform has the advantages of extensive sales channels and convenient financing method, which can help the national rural revitalization task to be accomplished as soon as possible. Therefore, it is considered that farmer generally faces a shortage of production funds, and the platform can provide financing help, and constructs the decision-making models of the supply chains of “farmer+smart platform”, “farmer+wholesaler+smart platform” and “farmer+rural cooperative+smart platform” and so on. “and other decision-making models of the supply chain of the farming assistance model. It is found that:(1) when farmer's affluence and consumers' preference for helping farmer increase, the market demand for agricultural products increases, which will enhance the profits of the members in the supply chain of the smart platform, and the improvement of the level of smart services helps to expand the market demand for agricultural products, which will in turn benefit the farmer, wholesaler, and rural cooperative in obtaining more profits, but the platform's profits are reduced due to the increase in the cost of investing in wisdom, and the interest-bearing loan. In the case of interest-bearing loans, the profit of farmer will decrease as the interest rate increases, while the profit of the platform will increase as the interest rate increases. (2) Under the “farmer + smart platform” direct marketing model, farmer and the smart platform can get the most profit because they can avoid the double marginal markup problem,but in reality, farmer is difficult to sell agricultural products directly on the platform due to the limitation of conditions, so it is difficult to realize this model, and at this time, farmer chooses to cooperate with the rural cooperatives to help them share production costs, which can get more profit. At this time,farmer chooses to cooperate with rural cooperative to help them share the cost of production, which can obtain more profits, so the richness effect of the “farmer + rural cooperative + smart platform” model will be better. (3) Under the three modes of smart platform to help farmer, farmer can obtain higher profit s through interest-free loans, while smart platform can obtain higher profits through interest-bearing loans. At this time, the government can design a reasonable subsidy policy to incentivize the smart platforms to improve the level of smart services while agreeing with farmers' expectations of interest-free loans in their financing strategies.

Key words: smart supply chain, farmers wealth with assistance, online financing, government subsidies

中图分类号: