主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 171-181.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1029cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1029

• • 上一篇    下一篇

溢出效应下制造商的直播带货策略研究

李恒宇1,柴俊武2()   

  1. 1.西北工业大学管理学院,陕西 西安 710072
    2.电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川 成都 611731
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-26 修回日期:2022-03-14 出版日期:2024-09-25 发布日期:2024-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 柴俊武 E-mail:chaijw@uestc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71872028);四川省哲学社会科学研究基地数字文化与传媒研究基金项目(19CDCM03)

Cooperation Strategy of Manufacturer in Live-streaming Considering with Spillover Effect

Hengyu Li1,Junwu Chai2()   

  1. 1.School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
    2.School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
  • Received:2021-05-26 Revised:2022-03-14 Online:2024-09-25 Published:2024-10-12
  • Contact: Junwu Chai E-mail:chaijw@uestc.edu.cn

摘要:

随着网络直播的兴起和线上购物的蓬勃发展,各大制造商开启直播带货这一新颖的营销手段。制造商通常会与直播带货商签订两种销售合同:转卖合同、佣金合同。基于此,本文运用博弈论方法研究制造商在直播带货渠道下的最优产品定价以及最优直播带货合同选择问题。结果显示,当佣金费率适中时,制造商和直播带货商会偏好同一 种合同选择。竞争效应较低时或溢出效应为负时,双方更偏好佣金合同;竞争效应较高或溢出效应为正时,双方更偏好转卖合同。此外,溢出效应的增强或佣金费率的提高会增加双方达成一致合同偏好的区域。本文还拓展考虑了混合直播带货合同的影响,结果显示,一定条件下双方仍旧愿意选择佣金合同。有趣的是,混合合同总会导致一方变好的同时使另一方变得更差。数值模拟进一步证明了本文的结果。这项研究有助于制造商以及直播带货商决定如何采用特定的销售合同以获取更多利润,并为相关从业者提供了战略性的指导建议。

关键词: 直播带货, 优惠券, 溢出效应, 渠道竞争

Abstract:

With the rise of live streaming and the boom in online shopping, many manufacturers have opened up live streaming distribution as a new marketing channel. Such live streaming leads to intense competition with the manufacturer’s official online store. However, consumers may be interested in the product and also purchase it in the official online store due to the spillover effect of the live streaming. Therefore, it is important to investigate how the spillover and competition effects of the live streaming channel impact the manufacturer’s pricing strategy. In practice, the contract between manufacturers and live-stream carriers is generally classified into two different types: resale model and commission model. Thus, it is also worth investigating the contract selection for the manufacturer.Based on the above background, this paper establishes a supply chain system consisting of the manufacturer and the live-stream carrier. A game-theoretic research approach is applied to examine the interaction between the manufacturer and the live-stream carrier. First, the manufacturer will decide to introduce the live streaming business with a live-stream carrier by selecting two types of sales contracts: (1) resale contracts (2) commission contracts. Second, the live-stream carrier will decide its subsidy price, and the manufacturer will decide the selling price of its products in its official online store. Finally, consumers generate purchase behavior in different channels based on price competition between channels. The innovations of this article are: First, it is one of the few to consider the channel competition between the online store and live-streaming distribution for this article. Second, the spillover effect in the live streaming is explained, which extends the interaction knowledge between spillover effect and sales contract selection. Third, the discount coupon of the live carrier and the impact of sales contracts on its profitability discussed, which further reveals the sustainable development of the live streaming supply chain.Some interesting results are obtained by comparing the equilibrium results in terms of the optimal product price, subsidy, and profit. First, the results show that there always exists Pareto gains for the entire supply chain. Specifically, when the commission rate is moderate, if the competition degree between two channels is low, the manufacturer and the live-stream carrier are willing to adopt the commission contract. If the competition degree is high, both parties are willing to choose the resale contract. However, enhancing the spillover effect will expand the “win-win” region of two parties. Second, the extended situation is considered where the manufacturer offers a mixed live-streaming contract. The extended situation shows that under certain circumstances, both parties still willing to choose the commission contract, which proves the robust of this study. Interestingly, the preference of the two parties for the mixed contract may cause the other party to become worse. The numerical simulation is also given to further prove our results and strategic guidance is provided for manufacturers, live-stream carrier, and relevant practitioners on management to achieve more profits. For example, it is proposed that the profit of the entire supply chain can be improved by reducing the negative impact of subsidies. It is also advocated that those laws and regulations related to live streaming should be perfected and formulated.

Key words: live-streaming business, discount coupon, spillover effect, channel competition

中图分类号: