主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 118-129.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1823

• • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑用户搜索行为的移动健康平台推荐策略

李佩伦, 尹秋菊, 颜志军()   

  1. 北京理工大学管理学院,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-01 修回日期:2024-05-04 出版日期:2024-12-25 发布日期:2025-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 颜志军 E-mail:yanzhijun@bit.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72072011);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2023CX13026)

M-Health Platform Recommended Strategy Analysis Considering User Search Behavior

Peilun Li, Qiuju Yin, Zhijun Yan()   

  1. School of Management,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2023-11-01 Revised:2024-05-04 Online:2024-12-25 Published:2025-01-02
  • Contact: Zhijun Yan E-mail:yanzhijun@bit.edu.cn

摘要:

推荐系统是在线电子商务平台中的常用工具,移动健康平台中的课程推荐系统能帮助用户筛选所需的运动课程。现有文献发现,推荐系统能有效地作用于需求侧,受到推荐的产品的销量在其影响下能够显著增加。但尚不清楚用户具有自主搜索行为时,课程推荐系统如何缓解或加剧课程提供商间的价格竞争,以及不同的推荐策略(利润导向或用户导向)和推荐精准度如何影响平台利润。本文建立了移动健康平台推荐策略分析模型,探索了平台推荐对课程提供商之间价格博弈的影响机制,进而讨论了平台在不同推荐策略下的收益情况,并提出了平台最优推荐策略。结果表明,推荐系统改变了市场规模,但并不一定对平台有利。平台能够从轻度利润导向或轻度用户导向的推荐策略中获益,且推荐系统的精准度有助于提高平台收益。而平台的最优推荐策略与佣金率、随机用户比例和用户的课程偏好差异有关。高佣金率、较多的随机用户数量和较大的课程偏好差异均会使平台更倾向于采用轻度用户导向的推荐策略。

关键词: 移动健康, 推荐策略, 价格竞争, 搜索行为

Abstract:

Recommender systems are common tools in e-commerce platforms. In mobile health platforms, course recommender systems assist users in finding relevant exercise courses. Existing literature suggests that recommender systems can effectively cater to user demand, leading to a significant increase in sales for recommended products. However, it remains unclear how recommender systems impact price competition among course providers when users engage in self-searching behavior. Recommendation can be perceived as a form of platform intervention, inspiring users' purchase decision to the recommended products. Additionally, users have autonomous search behaviors. When the recommended courses fail to satisfy users’ needs, they will actively seek alternatives within the same platform or other platforms. Moreover, the influence of different recommended strategies (profit-oriented or user-oriented) and recommender accuracy on platform profits needs further investigation. The design of recommender systems may not solely aim to benefit users, but also to motivate users to buy products that can help platforms to earn more commission fee. Specifically, to achieve higher profits, the recommender systems may misguide users to purchase courses that generate greater revenue for platforms.The impact of different recommendation strategies (user-oriented or profit-oriented) on the profits of a mobile health platform is examined and primarily two key questions are explored: First, how do user-oriented or profit-oriented recommendation strategies affect price competition among exercise course providers and platform profits when users have autonomous search behavior? Second, how should the platform make optimal decisions between user-oriented and profit-oriented recommendation strategies?To address these research questions, an analytical framework is developed in which two course providers offer substitute fitness courses on a mHealth platform and simultaneously set their prices. The platform charges the providers a percentage commission and recommends only one course to users. Users are not knowledgeable about the fitness courses and need to search individually. In the searching process, optimal stopping rules are adopted to characterize users’ decision-making process before purchasing. The model first considers the baseline scenario in the absence of a recommender system. It analyzes users’ purchase decisions, derives the equilibrium prices of courses, and assesses provider profits. Next, the model assumes that the recommender system exogenously alters users’ searching order. It distinguishes profit-oriented and user-oriented recommendation strategies based on the weights assigned to platform profits and user utility. Furthermore, the model explores the equilibrium prices of courses, provider and platform profits accordingly. Finally, how platforms should select the optimal recommendation strategy in different market environments is discussed.The practical significance is held for mobile health platforms with deployed recommender systems. When the system solely focuses on platform revenue while overlooking providers' strategic responses, or excessively favors either provider profits or user utility, it may potentially harm the platform's profit. Moreover, the factors are identified that determine whether the platform can benefit from the recommender system. These include the recommendation strategy, recommender accuracy, the proportion of random users, and differences in users' course preferences. It has also described how these factors influence the platform's profit.The results show that (1) When the number of users randomly purchasing exercise courses is relatively high, course providers tend to reduce course price to attract users. When users have diverse preferences for courses and their demand for courses and value assessments also vary significantly, providers have to satisfy different demands through low-price strategies. (2) The high accuracy of the recommender system is more likely to provide users with suitable exercise courses based on their preferences, which helps alleviate price competition among providers. (3) Recommender systems can alter market size but do not necessarily guarantee platform benefits. Platforms can benefit from moderately profit-oriented or user-oriented recommendation strategies. The accuracy of the recommender system contributes to increased platform revenue. (4) When choosing optimal recommendation strategy, platforms should consider commission rates, random user ratio, and the heterogeneity of user health levels within the market environment. Higher commission rates, higher random user ratios, or greater health heterogeneity exert pressure on platforms to adopt a moderately user-oriented recommendation strategy.

Key words: mobile health, recommendation strategies, price competition, search behavior

中图分类号: