主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

需求-汇率风险聚集下的汇率风险对冲与批发价激励

展开
  • 1. 电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 四川 成都 610054;
    2. 西南科技大学经济管理学院, 四川 绵阳 621010
杜娟(1981-),女(汉族),四川成都人,电子科技大学经济与管理学院,博士,研究方向:供应链管理.

收稿日期: 2013-06-06

  修回日期: 2014-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70932005);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272129);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目(NCET-11-0064);四川青年科技基金资助项目(2013JQ0031);四川省科技支撑项目(2010GZ0155);电子科技大学百人计划中青年学术带头人培养计划(Y02018023601063)

Exchange Rate Risk Hedging and Wholesale Price Incentive under Demand and Exchange Rate Risk Pooling

Expand
  • 1. School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China

Received date: 2013-06-06

  Revised date: 2014-03-06

  Online published: 2015-01-21

摘要

以一个由上游制造商和下游零售商组成的二级供应链为建模背景,在汇率风险和需求风险聚集(pooling)在下游零售商的情况下,分别建立了有无批发价激励情形下的两个动态博弈模型,获得了相应的均衡。通过分析相应的均衡,结果表明,(1)在两种情形下,零售商的汇率风险对冲行为具有稳定供应链生产行为的作用,但批发价激励能够提高零售商的汇率风险对冲比例和供应链节点企业间的交易价格;(2)与无批发价激励的情形相比,有批发价激励时的制造商利润较高,从而制造商有使用批发价激励零售商对冲汇率风险的动机;(3)在风险聚集下,"通过较低的批发价来激励零售商对冲汇率风险"这一策略能够实现供应链盈利水平与风险承担之间的权衡:需求和汇率风险增加均会使得供应链节点企业和供应链整体的盈利水平降低,同时也将降低风险聚集处的节点企业和供应链整体的利润方差。

本文引用格式

杜娟, 倪得兵, 唐小我 . 需求-汇率风险聚集下的汇率风险对冲与批发价激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(1) : 1 -9 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.01.001

Abstract

Considering a two-echelon supply chain consisting of an upstream manufacturer and a downstream retailer where the exchange rate risk and demand risk are pooled at the downstream retailer, two dynamic game models corresponding to whether or not the retailer is stimulated to hedge the exchange rate risk via lowering the wholesale price are established, and the corresponding equilibriums are calculated. With the equilibriums, the results show that (1)the retailer's exchange rate risk-hedging stabilizes the supply chain's production regardless of the wholesale price incentive whereas the wholesale price incentive raises the retailer's hedging proportion of total purchase payment and the wholesale price itself;(2)the wholesale price incentive makes the manufacturer reap higher profit, implying that the manufacturer is willing to incentivize the retailer to hedge the exchange rate risk;(3) under risk pooling, incentivizing the retailer to hedge the exchange rate risk via a lower wholesale price is able to achieve a tradeoff between expected profit and profit variance: the increasing in the exchange rate risk and demand risk reduce the (expected) profitability for both the whole supply chain and individual node firms, and at the same time, lower the profit variance for both the whole supply chain and the node firm where the two risks are pooled.

参考文献

[1] Manuj I, Mentzer J T. Global supply chain risk management strategies[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2008, 38(3): 192-223.

[2] Tang Ou, Musa S N. Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 133(1):25-34.

[3] 宁钟,孙薇.供应链风险管理研究评述[J]. 管理学家(学术版),2009,(2):53-64.

[4] Lee H L, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect[J]. Management Science, 1997,43(4): 546-558.

[5] 但斌,唐国锋,宋寒,等.需求不确定下两阶段应用服务供应链市场风险分担机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2010,18(3):45-52.

[6] Manuj I, Mentzer T. Global supply chain risk management[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2008, 29(1): 133-153.

[7] Klibi W, Martel A, Guitouni A. The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010b, 203(2): 283-293.

[8] Liu Zugang, Nagurney A. Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition[J]. Omega, 2011, 39(5):539-549.

[9] Vidal C J, Goetschalckx M. A global supply chain model with transfer pricing and transportation cost allocation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 129(1):134-158.

[10] Ding Qing, Dong Lingxiu, Kouvelis P. On the integration of production and financial hedging decisions in global market[J]. Operations Research, 2007, 55(3): 470-489.

[11] Bartram S M, Brown G W, Fehle F R. International evidence on financial derivatives usage[J]. Financial Management, 2009, 38(1): 185-206.

[12] 杨庆定,黄培清. 基于数量柔性契约的制造型企业的最优国际订购策略[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,32(1):25-29.

[13] Van Mieghem J A. Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing, and hedging[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8): 1269-1288.

[14] Chod J, Rudi N, Van Mieghem J A. Operational flexibility and financial hedging: Complements or Substitutes?[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(6): 1030-1045.

[15] Gaur V, Seshadri S. Hedging inventory risk through market instruments[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2005, 7(2):103-120.

[16] 宁钟,戴俊俊. 期权在供应链风险管理中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(7):49-54.

[17] Cachon G.P. Supply chain coordination with contracts[M]// De Kok A G, Graves S C. Handbooks in OR & MS. North Holland: Elsevier, 2003.

[18] Caldentey R, Haugh M. Supply contracts with financial hedging[J]. Operations Research, 2009, 57(1): 47-65.

[19] Van Mieghem J, Dada M. Price versus production postponement: Capacity and competition[J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(12): 1631-1649.

[20] Dong Lingxiu, Liu Hong. Equilibrium forward contracts on nonstorable commodities in the presence of market power[J]. Operations Research, 2007, 55(1): 128-145.
文章导航

/