主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

消费者对不同排量汽车购买行为的演化研究

展开
  • 1. 西安交通大学管理学院, 陕西 西安 710049;
    2. 兰州大学管理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000
张国兴(1978-),男(汉族),内蒙商都人,兰州大学管理学院教授、博士生导师,西安交通大学管理学博士、管理科学与工程博士后,研究方向:资源与环境管理、项目管理.

收稿日期: 2013-05-08

  修回日期: 2014-01-21

  网络出版日期: 2015-08-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(71103077);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-13-0267);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2013T60880);教育部人文社会科学基金(10YJC630377)

Evolution Game of Consumer Purchasing Behavior on Different Displacement Vehicles

Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China) (;
    2. School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received date: 2013-05-08

  Revised date: 2014-01-21

  Online published: 2015-08-19

摘要

汽车行业是我国能源消耗和污染物排放"大户",是节能减排工作的重点。政府出台了针对性的汽车消费政策以鼓励和引导汽车消费者购买行为。本文根据我国汽车消费市场消费者对不同排量汽车购买行为及政府消费政策之间的博弈情况,构建消费者和政府的演化博弈模型,分析混合均匀情形下的消费者群体考虑单一汽车品牌情况下选取不同排量汽车行为的演化问题,研究表明:在油价、消费效用、消费政策及购车成本的共同作用下,消费者购买行为存在向小排量演化、随机演化和向大排量演化三种具体情况。以大众迈腾汽车为案例分析了目前消费者购买行为的演化特征,当汽油价格较低所带来的运营变动成本不足以成为阻碍汽车消费者购买大排量汽车行为因素,或者消费效用之差较高的情况下,政府要加大实施消费政策力度以引导消费者购买小排量汽车;当汽油价格位于较高水平下,政府可以逐步放松实施与汽车排量相关的消费政策。为政府科学合理引导汽车消费者节能购车行为提供理论借鉴。

本文引用格式

张国兴, 程素杰, 汪应洛 . 消费者对不同排量汽车购买行为的演化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(8) : 148 -157 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.08.017

Abstract

The automotive industry is an important source of China's energy consumption and pollutant emissions, and is the focus of the work of energy saving and emission reduction, and the government adjusted auto consumption policy to encourage and guide automotive consumer s' buying behavior. In this context, according to the game between the situations in China's auto consumption market consumer buying behavior of different cars and government consumption policies, an evolutionary game model of consumer purchase behavior for different displacement cars is constructed, and the evolution problem of the evenly mixed consumer group's different displacement automobile behavior is analyzed in the case of single automobile brand. Studies have shown that: in the combined effect of oil prices, consumer utility, consumer policy and car costs, consumer buying behavior exists to the three specific evolution cases of the evolution to the small displacement evolution, random evolution and the evolution to the large displacement. Then the evolution characteristics of consumer buying behavior are analyzed in the particular case of the Volkswagen Magotan car in the current circumstances. When the operational costs for lower oil price is not enough to become an obstacle to the car consumers to buy cars behavior capacity factors, or the utility consumption difference is higher, the government should increase the intensity of consumption policies to guide consumers to purchase low-emission cars; when the oil price is on the higher level, the government can gradually relax implementation auto consumption policy. The theoretical support is provided for the government to guide automotive consumers' scientific and reasonable energy-saving buying behavior.

参考文献

[1] 张毅,夏炎.工业化过程中碳排放消费建设比的演变规律研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(2):159-166.

[2] 王建明.公众资源节约与环境保护消费行为测度——外部表现、内在动因和分类维度[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(6):141-146.

[3] 张连刚.基于多群组结构方程模型视角的绿色购买行为影响因素分析——来自东部、中部、西部的数据[J].中国农村经济,2010,26(2):44-56.

[4] 王建明,贺爱忠.消费者低碳消费行为的心理归因和政策干预路径:一个基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(4):80-89.

[5] Hickman R, Ashiru O, Banister D. Transport and Climate change: Simulating the options for carbon reduction in London[J]. Transport Policy,2010,17( 2): 110-125.

[6] Chan R Y K, Lau L B Y. Antecedents of green purchases: A survey in China[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2000, 17(4): 338-357.

[7] Nyborg K, Howarth R B, Brekke K A. Green consumers and public policy: On socially contingent moral motivation[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2006, 28(4): 351-366.

[8] 高红贵.中国绿色经济发展中的诸方博弈研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22 (4):13-18.

[9] 金晓彤和杨晓东.中国城镇居民消费行为变异的四个假说及其理论分析[J].管理世界,2004,11:5-14(28).

[10] Smith J M, Price G R. The logic of animal conflict[J]. Naturem 1973,246(5427):15-18.

[11] Vincent T L, Brown J S. Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and darwinian dynamics[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[12] Nowak M A, Sigmund K. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games [J]. Science, 2004, 303(5659):793-9.

[13] Röhl T, Röhl C, Schuster H G, et al. Impact of fraud on the mean-field dynamics of cooperative social systems[J]. Physical Review E, 2007, 76(3):62-85.

[14] Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, et al. A Simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks [J].Nature, 2006, 44(7092): 502-505.

[15] Nyborg K, Rege M. On social norms: The evolution of considerate smoking behavior [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2003, 52(3): 323-340.

[16] Guttman J M. On the evolutionary stability of preferences for reciprocity[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 16(1):31-51.

[17] 王维国,王霄凌.基于演化博弈的我国高能耗企业节能减排政策分析[J].财经问题研究,2012,(4):75-82.

[18] 郭本海,方志耕,刘卿.基于演化博弈的区域高耗能产业退出机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2012,20(4): 79-80.

[19] 朱庆华,窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J].管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6):86-95.

[20] 黄凯男.演化博弈与演化经济学[J].经济研究,2009,(2):132-145.

[21] Buesser P, Tomassini M. Evolution of cooperation on spatially embedded networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2012, 86(5):345-362.

[22] Zhang Haifeng, Wu Zhixi, Xu Xiaoke, et al. Impacts of subsidy policies on vaccination decisions in contact networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2013, 88(1): 895-911.

[23] 王先甲,全吉,刘伟兵.有限理性下的演化博弈与合作机制研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(1):82-93.
文章导航

/