主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

基于GM(1,1)模型的Kano质量要素分类动态预测方法

展开
  • 1. 江苏科技大学经济管理学院, 江苏 镇江 212003;
    2. 湖南大学工商管理学院, 湖南 长沙 410082
孟庆良(1980-),男(汉族),河南扶沟人,江苏科技大学经济管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士,湖南大学工商管理学院博士后,研究方向:顾客关系管理、数据挖掘方面.

收稿日期: 2013-07-02

  修回日期: 2014-03-20

  网络出版日期: 2015-09-28

基金资助

国家社科基金资助项目(14CGL014);教育部人文社科基金资助项目(11YJA630078,09YJA630054);中国博士后面上资助一等基金资助项目(2013M530353);中国物流学会课题(2015CSLKT3-033);江苏科技大学"青蓝工程"资助

The Game Analyses on the M&A Transaction Price Decision Based on the Binomial Tree Option Model

Expand
  • 1. School of Management & Economics, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China;
    2. Business School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received date: 2013-07-02

  Revised date: 2014-03-20

  Online published: 2015-09-28

摘要

针对目前缺乏对Kano模型质量要素的分类结果进行动态预测研究的问题,结合灰色系统理论在处理不规则数据方面的优势,提出基于GM(1,1)模型的Kano质量要素分类动态预测方法。针对传统Kano模型分类结果过于主观的缺点,设计模糊Kano模型实现质量要素的客观化分类;结合GM(1,1)模型能处理少数据、贫信息,具有高预测精度的优点,利用GM(1,1)模型研究Kano质量要素分类动态预测问题;最后通过在快递业的实证验证模型的可行性和有效性。

本文引用格式

孟庆良, 何林, 朱慧明, 卞玲玲, 张玲 . 基于GM(1,1)模型的Kano质量要素分类动态预测方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(9) : 139 -145 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.09.017

Abstract

According to the lack of study on the dynamic of quality elements classification results of Kano model, a dynamic prediction method based on GM(1,1) model is proposed in this paper, combining with grey system theory's advantage in coping with irregular data. A fuzzy Kano model is designed to realize its objective classification, due to the deficiency of traditional Kano model's subjective classification. GM(1,1) is used to study the dynamic of quality elements classification of Kano model, combining with its advantage in coping with less data, poor information, high prediction accuracy. Its feasibility and validity will be tested by an empirical research in an express industry.

参考文献

[1] Chen Longsheng, Liu Cheng-Hsiang, Chun-Chin Hsu, et al. C-Kano model: a novel approach for discovering attractive quality elements[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2010, 21(11): 1189-1214.

[2] Mikulic J, Prebe?ac D. A critical review of techniques for classifying quality attributes in the Kano model[J]. Managing Service Quality, 2011,1(21): 46-66.

[3] Löfgren M, Witell L. Two decades of using kano's theory of attractive quality: A literature review[J]. The Quality Management Journal, 2008, 15(1): 59-76.

[4] Kano N,Seraku N,Takahashi F, et al. Attractive quality and must-be quality [J]. The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control, 1984, 41(2): 39-48.

[5] Kano N. Life cycle and creation of attractive quality//Proceedings of the 4th QMOD Conference, Linköping, Sweden, 2001.

[6] Nilsson-Witell L, Fundin A. Dynamics of service attributes: A test of Kano's theory of attractive quality [J].International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2005, 16(2): 152-168.

[7] Rahario H. Deling with Kano model dynamics: Strengthening the quality function deployment as a design for six sigma tool[J]. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 2007, 9(1): 15-26.

[8] Raharjo H, Xie M, Brombacher A C.On modeling dynamic priorities in the hierarchy process using compositional data analysis [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 194(3): 834-846.

[9] Raharjo H, Aarnout C, Brombacher A C, et al. On integrating Kano's model dynamics into QFD for multiple product design [J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2010, 26(4): 351-363.

[10] 刘思峰, 党耀国, 方志耕,等. 灰色系统理论及其应用(第五版) [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010, 5.

[11] Yang C C. The refined Kano's model and its application[J]. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 2005,16(10):1127-1137.

[12] 陈波波, 齐佳音,黄逸君等. 对Kano模型中质量要素评价倾向判定方法的改进[J]. 北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 4(2): 51-53.

[13] 孟庆良,何林. 基于模糊KANO模型的质量属性分类方法及应用[J].工业工程,2013,16 (3): 121-125.
文章导航

/