主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

政府激励政策下人造板绿色供应链谈判-协调机制研究

展开
  • 1. 南京师范大学商学院, 江苏 南京 210023;
    2. 大亚科技股份有限公司, 江苏 镇江 212300;
    3. 江苏省民营经济决策研究基地, 江苏 南京 210023
陈志松(1983-),男(汉族),江苏盐城人,南京师范大学商学院副教授,博士,大亚科技股份有限公司博士后,研究方向:供应链管理与资源能源管理,E-mail:chenzhisong836@163.com

收稿日期: 2013-10-12

  修回日期: 2014-07-09

  网络出版日期: 2016-02-25

基金资助

中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2014M551623);江苏省博士后科研资助计划项目(1301077C);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金资助项目(2014SJB094);江苏省高校自然科学研究基金面上项目(15KJB110012);南京师范大学人文社会科学青年科研人才培育基金资助项目(1409006)

A Bargaining-Coordination Mechanism for Green Supply Chain of Wood-based Panel under the Government's Incentive Policy

Expand
  • 1. Business School, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China;
    2. Dare Technology Co., Ltd., Zhenjiang 212300, China;
    3. Jiangsu Private Economic Decision Research Base, Nanjing 210023, China

Received date: 2013-10-12

  Revised date: 2014-07-09

  Online published: 2016-02-25

摘要

当前我国人造板产业面临效率低下、资源浪费和环境污染等问题,上下游企业缺乏合作与协调。本文界定了人造板绿色供应链系统,运用契约理论和纳什谈判理论,分别构建了政府激励政策下人造板绿色供应链集中优化决策、分散均衡决策和谈判协调决策模型,从而建立了相应的收益分享-成本分担契约谈判协调机制,并基于相关行业和企业经验数据,与传统人造板供应链进行了对比数值分析。研究结果表明:(1)收益分享-成本分担契约谈判-协调机制能够很好地实现人造板绿色供应链的协调运营,提高资源效率,降低环境负影响和提升运营绩效。(2)人造板绿色供应链管理模式下供应链及其成员的最优利润均高于传统管理模式,谈判协调决策情形下供应链及其成员的最优利润均高于分散均衡决策情形。(3)制定有"门槛"的增值税即征即退政策和适当的环境税政策,自建经济林场、选用经济型枝桠材,强化技术研发和工艺改进,有助于提高人造板供应链运营绩效。

本文引用格式

陈志松 . 政府激励政策下人造板绿色供应链谈判-协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016 , 24(2) : 115 -124 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.02.015

Abstract

Currently, China's wood based panel(WBP) industry is faced with problems of waste of resources, environmental pollution, and lack of efficient cooperation and coordination. Considering the practice of WBP industry, WBP green supply chain system is defined. Further, based on optimality theory and Stackelberg game theory, a centralized optimization decision model and a decentralized equilibrium decision model of WBP green supply chain under the government's incentive policy of value-added tax refund and environmental tax collection are respectively built. On this basis, combining contract theory and Nash bargaining theory, setting the decentralized equilibrium profit of branch-wood supplier and WBP manufacturer as the disagreement point, a bargaining-coordination model of WBP green supply chain under the government's incentive policy of value-added tax refund and environmental tax collection is built:the branch-wood supplier provides a revenue-cost sharing contract in which the branch-wood supplier charges a lower wholesale price to WBP manufacturer, if the WBP manufacturer accepts this contract, he will share a proportion of his revenue and cost to the supplier. Then, they need to bargain over the revenue-cost sharing rate, which depends on the bargaining power of both sides. After this rate is set, WBP manufacturer will decide the end-price and order quantity, the supplier will produce and deliver branch-wood at a lower wholesale price to WBP manufacturer. Afterwards, WBP manufacturer will share a fraction 1-φ of his revenue and cost to the supplier, where φ is the revenue-cost keeping fraction of the manufacturer, and φ∈[0,1]. And then, the corresponding bargaining-coordination mechanism of revenue-cost sharing contract for WBP green supply chain under the government's incentive is built. Finally, based on the empirical data from industry and enterprise, the numerical analysis is carried out by comparing with the results of traditional WBP supply chain. The results show that:(i) The bargaining-coordination mechanism of revenue-cost sharing contract can effectively achieve coordinated operations, improve resources efficiency, reduce the negative environmental impact and improve the operations performance of WBP green supply chain.(ii) The optimal profits of WBP supply chain and its members under the WBP green supply chain management mode are higher than that under the traditional WBP supply chain management mode; the optimal profits of WBP supply chain and its members under bargaining-coordination decision situations are higher than that under decentralized equilibrium decision situations.(iii) Making policy of value-added tax refund with threshold and suitable environmental tax collection, self-construction of the economic forest farm, choosing the economical branch-wood and enhancing technology R & D and process improvement, are beneficial for improving the operations performance of WBP green supply chain. The bargaining-coordination mechanism of revenue-cost sharing contract built in this paper, providing a more equitable and efficient coordination mechanism for green supply chain operations of traditional manufacturing enterprises, which is a good improvement for the classical method of supply chain contract coordination in the theory, and also a good application reference for other types of green supply chain coordination in the practice.

参考文献

[1] 王硕. 我国人造板行业的现状思考及趋势判断——访中国林产工业协会副会长钱小瑜[J]. 中国人造板, 2013,(1):1-5.

[2] 戴永务,刘燕娜,余建辉. 外商直接投资影响中国人造板产业国际竞争力的分析[J]. 林业经济问题,2007,(4):315-319.

[3] 戴永务,林伟明,许澎捷,等. 技术创新与人造板产业国际竞争力提升策略研究[J]. 林业经济问题,2012,32(1):8-13.

[4] 余建辉,戴永务,刘燕娜. 森林资源对中国人造板产业国际竞争力的影响分析[J]. 林业经济,2008,(8):44-47+52.

[5] 余韵,陈超英,戴永务. 影响人造板产量增长之因素的实证分析[J]. 中国林业经济,2010,(3):23-25+31.

[6] 唐帅,宋维明,程宝栋. 我国人造板产业内贸易与竞争力关系研究——基于格兰杰检验的实证分析[J]. 林业经济,2013,(2):39-43.

[7] 戴永务,刘燕娜,余建辉. 中国人造板产业国际竞争力的评价[J]. 中国林业经济,2007,(4):13-16.

[8] 郑明亮,肖平. 基于主成分分析的区域人造板产业竞争力评价[J]. 林业经济问题,2009,(2):133-137.

[9] 舒文博. 人造板产品在发展低碳经济中的作用[J]. 林产工业,2013,(6):51-53.

[10] 楚杰,段新芳,张冉. 我国人造板产业应对世界低碳经济模式的途径思考[J]. 世界林业研究,2013,(1):84-88.

[11] 金波,冯达,郭青俊. 低碳经济背景下中国人造板产业可持续发展战略探析[J]. 山西高等学校社会科学学报,2013,(4):22-25+37.

[12] Zhu Qinghua, Sarkis J, Geng Yong. Green supply chain management in China:Pressures, practices and performance[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2005, 25(5):449-468

[13] Zhu Qinghua, Sarkis J. An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China:Drivers and practices[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2006, 14(5):472-486

[14] Azevedo SG, Carvalho H, Machado VC. The influence of green practices on supply chain performance:A case study approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011, 47(6):850-871

[15] Zhu Qinghua, Geng Yong, Sarkis J, et al. Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011, 47(6):808-821

[16] Abdallah T, Farhat A, Diabat A, et al. Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing:Formulation and life cycle assessment[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, 36(9):4271-4285

[17] Mirhedayatian SM, Azadi M, Saen RF. A novel network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating green supply chain management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 147(B):544-554

[18] Zhu Qinghua, Sarkis J, Lai K. Green supply chain management:Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, 15(11-12):1041-1052

[19] Lin Rujen, Chen RH, Nguyen TH. Green supply chain management performance in automobile manufacturing industry under uncertainty[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 25:233-245

[20] Holt D, Ghobadian A. An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers[J].Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2009, 20(7):933-956

[21] Elhedhli S, Merrick R. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment, 2012, 17(5):370-379

[22] 杨光勇,计国君. 构建基于三重底线的绿色供应链:欧盟与美国的环境规制比较[J]. 中国工业经济,2011,(2):120-130.

[23] Sheu JB. Bargaining framework for competitive green supply chains under governmental financial intervention[J].Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2011, 47(5):573-592

[24] Sheu JB, Chen YJ. Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 138(1):201-213

[25] 朱庆华,窦一杰. 绿色供应链中政府与核心企业进化博弈模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2007,12(12):85-89+95.

[26] 朱庆华,窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报,2011,(06):86-95.

[27] 李瑞海,张涛. 减量化生产模式下绿色供应链效率比较[J]. 系统管理学报,2009,04:432-435.

[28] Zhang Chengtang, Liu Liping. Research on coordination mechanism in three-level green supply chain under non-cooperative game[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(5):3369-3379

[29] Cao Jian, Zhang Xuemei. Coordination strategy of green supply chain under the free market mechanism[J].Energy Procedia, 2013, 36:1130-1137

[30] 曹柬,吴晓波,周根贵. 基于产品效用异质性的绿色供应链协调策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(06):1279-1286.

[31] 王源渊,王忠伟. 基于绿色供应链理论的人造板企业物流运作模式研究[J]. 物流工程与管理,2010,32(12):63-65.

[32] Lariviere MA.A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates[J]. Operations Research, 2006, 54(3):602-604.

[33] Lariviere MA, Porteus EL.Selling to the newsvendor:An analysis of price-only contracts[J].Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2001,3(4):293-305.

[34] Wang Yunzeng. Joint pricing-production decisions in supply chains of complementary products with uncertain demand[J]. Operations Research, 2006, 54(6):1110-1127.

[35] Wang Yunzeng, Jiang Li, Shen Zuojun. Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(1):34-47.

[36] Petruzzi NC, Dada M. Pricing and the newsvendor problem:A review with extensions. Operations Research[J]. 1999, 47(2):183-194.

[37] Nash JF. The bargaining problem[J].Econometrica, 1950, 18(2):155-162.

[38] Kalai E, Smorodinsky M. Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem[J].Econometrica,1975,43(3):513-518.

[39] Muthoo A. Bargaining theory with applications[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1999.
文章导航

/