主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

零售商退出风险的供应链冲击与协调契约分析

展开
  • 1. 重庆工商大学会计学院, 重庆 400067;
    2. 重庆工商大学商务策划学院, 重庆 400067;
    3. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400030

收稿日期: 2014-07-10

  修回日期: 2015-04-19

  网络出版日期: 2016-07-05

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101160,71571024);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基本项目(15YJA630058,14YJA630087)

Analysis of Supply Chain Shock and Coordinating Contract with Retailer's Exiting Risk

Expand
  • 1. School ofAccountancy, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;
    2. School of Business Planning, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;
    3. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Received date: 2014-07-10

  Revised date: 2015-04-19

  Online published: 2016-07-05

摘要

零售商退出会导致供应链合作关系的终止,冲击供应链合作运营的基础,供应链企业需要合作应对吗?本文以数量折扣契约下的协调供应链为研究框架,研究存在零售商退出风险时传统数量折扣契约的供应链运作,并构建改进契约下的供应链协调模型。通过理论推演与仿真分析发现,零售商退出风险对供应链运作可能造成巨大的冲击,同时也惊讶地发现,虽然数量折扣契约在冲击下不能协调运作,但运作效率非常高。建议契约调整成本不高的供应链可选择我们改进后的协调数量折扣契约。

本文引用格式

孙彩虹, 田真真, 于辉 . 零售商退出风险的供应链冲击与协调契约分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016 , 24(6) : 38 -45 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.06.005

Abstract

Nowadays, the incidents often occur that retailers terminate the cooperation with their suppliers. Retailers' exiting the supply chain will not only cause loss of profits to itself and the suppliers, but also have shocks on basis the of supply chain cooperation.In this paper, whether the supply chain need to cooperation to cope with the problems when it has retailers' exiting risk is studied. The coordinated supply chain with quantity discount contract as the research foundation is chosen. By judging the adaptability of traditional quantity discount contract in the supply chain with retailers' exiting risk, the improved quantity discount contract which can coordinate the supply chain with exiting risk is then introduced. A two-level supply chain with one supplier and one retailer is built.Through the theoretical analysis and the numerical simulation of centralized and decentralized decision-making of the the model, it is found that retailers' exiting risk may have the great shock on the supply chain operations.At the same time, it is surprisingly found that although the quantity discount contract can not coordinate the supply chain under the great shock, the efficiency is very high. Therefore, it is suggested that in the supply chain with retailers' exiting risk, if the cost of coordination between the retailers and suppliers is very high, they can still use the traditional quantity discount contract contract since in this case it can achieve higher efficiency. But if the cost of coordination between enterprises is lower than the benefits the coordination brings, it is more beneficial to retailer and suppliers to adopt our recommended quantity discount contract.

参考文献

[1] Ping Jr. R A. Some uninvestigated antecedents of retailer exit intention[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1995, 34(3):171-180.

[2] Ping Jr. R A. The effects of satisfaction and structural constraints on retailer exit-ing, voice, loyalty, opportunities and neglect[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1993,69(3):320-352.

[3] Hirschman A O. Exit, voice and loyalty:Responses to decline in firms, organiza-tions and states[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1970.

[4] Stern L W, Reve T. Distribution channels as political economies:A framework for comparative analysis[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1980, 44(3):52-64.

[5] Ping Jr. R A. Channel relationship termination:A review and experiment[C]//Proceeding of 1990 Winter Educator's Conference.Chicago:American Marketing Association, 1990.

[6] Ping Jr. R A. Does satisfaction moderate the association between alternative attract-iveness and exit intention in a marketing channel[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1994, 22(4):364-371.

[7] Calisir F,Gumussoy C A.Factors causing the termination of the relationship with suppliers[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Hong Kong, December 8-11, 2009.

[8] Crawford J C, Thompson K N, Dunipace R A. Factors influencing the exit intentions of manufacturers' agents[J].Journal of Managerial Issues, 2011, 13(4):465-490.

[9] Wang Qiong, Kayande U, Jap S. The seeds of dissolution:Discrepancy and incoherence in buyer-supplier exchange[J]. Marketing Science,2010,29(6):1109-1124.

[10] Fleming D.Towards an model of understanding restoring actions during the stages of dissolution inter-organizational relationships[C]//Proceedinng of the 27th Industrial Marketing and Phurchasing Conference. Glasgow,Scotland,2011.

[11] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts[M]//Graves S, Ton de Kok.Handbooks in operations research and management science, supply chain management. Dutch:North-Holland, 2003.

[12] 杨德礼, 郭琼, 何勇, 等. 供应链契约研究进展[J]. 管理学报, 2006, 3(1):117-125.

[13] Monahan J P. A quantity discount pricing model to increase vendor profits[J].Management Science, 1984, 30(6):720-726.

[14] Hau L L, Rosenblatt M J. A generalized quantity discount pricing model to increase supplier profits[J]. Management Science, 1986, 32(9):1178-1185.

[15] Munson C L, Rosenblatt M J. CoordinatIng a three-level supply chain with quantity discounts[J].Ⅱ Transactions,2001,33(5):371-384.

[16] 汪传旭, 蒋良奎. 模糊随机需求条件下三级供应链的数量折扣协调策略[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2010, 44(12):1672-1677.

[17] 王勇, 孙海雷, 陈晓旭. 基于数量折扣的改良品供应链协调策略[J]. 中国管理科学,2014, 22(4):51-57.
文章导航

/