主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

闭环供应链模型下的产品回收模式选择

展开
  • 上海理工大学管理学院, 上海 200093

收稿日期: 2015-05-13

  修回日期: 2016-03-10

  网络出版日期: 2017-03-22

基金资助

沪江基金资助项目(A14006);国家级项目培养基金项目(16HJPY-MS02)

Selection of the Recycling Mode Based on Closed-loop Supply Chain Model

Expand
  • School of Management, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

Received date: 2015-05-13

  Revised date: 2016-03-10

  Online published: 2017-03-22

摘要

针对由一个制造商(再制造商)和一个零售商以及消费者组成的闭环供应链模型,在考虑回收品的管理成本和再制造成本的基础上,分析了两种不同回收模式下订货价格、订货量及各方收益的变化。结果表明:对制造商而言,选择间接回收模式会占优,而随着回收价格的增大,直接回收模式下的收益会占优;对于零售商而言,当回收价格及销售价格较低时,选择直接回收模式会占优,但当回收价格及销售价格增大到某一值时,选择间接回收模式则会占优。

本文引用格式

陈军, 田大钢 . 闭环供应链模型下的产品回收模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(1) : 88 -97 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.01.010

Abstract

In recent years, under the double pressure of resource shortages and environmental pollution, countries launched a series of environmental regulations. It forced companies to carry out the recycling of waste products and remanufacturing in order to strengthen eco-environmental protections and put our development in harmony with the natural ecological system. So the closed-loop supply chain was put forward, because it can realize ecological benefits and economic benefits at the same time. Although the subject of the closed-loop supply chain recycling channel choiceboasts of an extensive literature, these documents rarely consider the cost factor.In this paper, weassume enterprise of this supply chain remanufacture ability is insufficient, which would need government subsidies to incentive for remanufacturing. Considering the management cost in the process of recycling and remanufacturing cost, a closed loop supply chain model of a manufacturer and a retailer and consumers is constructed.Under the direct recycling channel, manufacturer set up a recycling station to collect waste products from consumers and unsalable products in the life cycle from retailer. And then turn the waste into recycled product for the next sales season to sell. In this mode, manufacturers are responsible for the cost of management and recycling, the process does not involve retailer.Under the indirect recycling channel, retailer takes charge of collecting waste products from consumers, and covers its management cost. Meanwhile manufacturer made a contract with retailer to encourage retailer to recycle products that retailer can resell unsalable products in the life cycle to manufacturer at higher price than the recycling price.By the numerical simulation analysis, we discussed the influence of order quantity、order price and the income of members in supply chain with the changing of recycling and selling price under these two recycling channels. The conclusion is as follows.(1) In terms of the manufacturer, the income mainly affected by the recycling price and is better t in the direct recycling channel at first. But selecting direct recycling mode is the optimal choice with the increasing of recycling price.(2) In terms of the retailer, selecting direct recycling mode will be dominant when these two prices remain at low levels. But the situation will be on the contrary as these two prices increasingsimultaneously. And the income under directly recovery mode mainly affected by the recycling price, under indirectly recovery mode it mostly affected by the selling price.This paper toke some key cost factors into consideration to make the study more adapted to the realistic environment. Besides research conclusions about recycling channel choice of closed-loop supply chain provide the certain reference value for evolutionary game theory of choosing recycling channels.

参考文献

[1] Gu Qiaolun, Ji Jianhua, Gao Tiegang.Pric-ing decisions for reverse supply chains[J].Kybernete,2011,40(5-6):831-841.

[2] 蹇明,陈志刚.基于双寡头竞争回收的再制造商信息泄露机理研究[J].工业技术经济,2014,(7):87-93.

[3] Mitra S, Webster S. Competion in remanufacturing and the effects of go-vernmentsubside[J].Production Economic,2008,111(2):287-298.

[4] 王文宾,张雨,范玲玲,等.不同政府决策目标下逆向供应链的奖惩机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(7):68-76.

[5] 张汉江,余华英,李聪颖.闭环供应链上的回收激励契约设计与政府补贴再制造政策的优化[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(8):71-78.

[6] Govindan K, Popiuc M N, Diabat A. Overview of coordination con-tracts within forward and reverse supply chains[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2013,47:319-334.

[7] Zolfagharinia H, Hafezi M, Farahani R Z, et al. A hybridtwo-stock inventory controlmodel for a reverse supply chain[J].Tran-sportation Research Part E,2014,67:141-161.

[8] 聂佳佳.零售商信息分享对闭环供应链回收模式的影响[J].管理科学学报,2013,16(5):69-82.

[9] Pop P C, Pintea C M, Sitar C P, et al. Anefficient reverse distribution system for solving sustainable supply chain net-work design problem[J].Joural of AppliedLogic, 2015,13:105-113.

[10] Ramos T R P, Gomes M I, Barbosa-Povoa A P. Planning asustainable reverse logist-ics system:Balancing costs with environment and social concerns[J].Omega,2014,48:60-74.

[11] Tian Yihui, Govindan K, Zhu Qinghua. A system dynamic model based on evolutionary game theory for green supply chainmanagement diffusion among Chinese man-ufacturers[J].Journal of Cleaner Pro-duction,2014,80:96-105.

[12] 桂华明,马世华,谢磊.基于寄售和需求预测准确度可提高的供应链协调策略研究[J].机械工程学报,2013,49(18):190-198.

[13] 缪朝炜,夏志强.基于以旧换新的闭环供应链决策模型[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(9):49-66.

[14] 张福安,达庆利,公彦德.考虑双向主导相异的闭环供应链物流策略与补贴机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(10):44-51.

[15] 付小勇,朱庆华,赵铁林.基于逆向供应链回收价格竞争的回收渠道选择策略[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(10):72-79.
文章导航

/