主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

交互作用不确定下的项目组合选择鲁棒决策

展开
  • 1. 南京大学工程管理学院, 江苏 南京 210093;
    2. 互联网+与大数据时代的中澳重大工程管理合作创新联盟

收稿日期: 2014-08-07

  修回日期: 2017-01-06

  网络出版日期: 2017-06-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重大项目(71390520,71390521);国家自然科学基金项目(71571098,91646123,71671088,71501102,71471077);南京大学优秀博士研究生创新能力提升计划资助项目(201601B034);南京大学博士研究生创新创意研究计划资助项目(2016010)

Robust Decision-Making of Project Portfolio Selectionwith Uncertain Project Interactions

Expand
  • 1. School of Engineering and Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2. Sino-Australia Collaborative Innovation Alliance for Megaproject Management in the Era of Internet+ and Big Data

Received date: 2014-08-07

  Revised date: 2017-01-06

  Online published: 2017-06-29

摘要

项目间交互作用以及参数不确定性增加了项目组合选择问题的复杂性和求解难度。研究带有不确定项目收益交互和资源交互作用的项目组合选择问题。建立鲁棒性可调节的鲁棒优化模型,通过模型逐步推导,建立与之等价的线性混合整数规划模型。例举一个研发项目的算例,用CPLEX求解并对实验结果进行分析。结果表明,该方法可以灵活地控制最优解的鲁棒性,适用于不同风险偏好的决策者,为项目管理者提供决策支持。

本文引用格式

陶莎, 盛昭瀚, 朱建波 . 交互作用不确定下的项目组合选择鲁棒决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(4) : 190 -196 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.04.023

Abstract

Project portfolio selection (PPS) is one of the most important basic problems in the field of project management. PPS is to select a subset of projects from candidates subject to resource capacity and some other constraints to realize one or more goals. By integrating some features, such as project interactions, parameter uncertainty and multiple objectives.The PSS is more complex and difficult to be solved. In practice, project interaction is influenced by many factors among which the relationships are uncertain and complicated.Consequently, the project interaction is usually with severer uncertainty and its probability distribution is difficult to estimate. Therefore, in this paper, the PSS problem with uncertain project interaction is investigated. At first, without considering uncertainty, the programming model is formulated to maximize the total profits for the PSS with two types of project interactions including profit interaction and resource consumption interaction. Then, the uncertainty of project interactions is taken into consideration. The uncertainty is defined as an interval with nominal value and the half-interval width. Two controller parameters called objective robustness level and constraint robustness level are also defined,which vary in the interval [0, 1].The objective robustness level and constraint robustness level control the robustness of objective function and constraints against the level of conservatism respectively. Based on the definitions of uncertainty as well as robustness level, the general robust optimization model is formulated.To solve the model, its robust counter part as a linear mix integer programming is derived on the basis of optimization theory. A case of R&D project portfolio selection is illustrated and numerous experiments are conducted to investigate the relationship among two robustness levels and the objective. Experiments show that the method can adjust the robustness of solutions, and thus can provide project managers who have different risk preferences with decision support.

参考文献

[1] 李星梅, 魏涵静,乞建勋,等. 资源约束下可打断项目组合选择模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11):40-46.

[2] Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K, Abtahi A R. A fuzzy multidimensional multiple-choice knapsack model for project portfolio selection using an evolutionary algorithm[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2013, 206(1):449-483.

[3] Gutjahr W J, Froeschl K A. Project portfolio selection under uncertainty with outsourcing opportunities[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 2013, 25(1-2):255-281.

[4] Yu L, Wang Shouyang, Wen Fenghua, et al. Genetic algorithm-based multi-criteria project portfolio selection[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2012, 197(1):71-86.

[5] 寿涌毅, 姚伟建. 信息不确定下项目组合选择问题的鲁棒优化[J]. 系统工程, 2009, 27(7):90-95.

[6] 杨颖, 杨善林, 胡小建. 基于战略一致性的新产品开发项目组合选择[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(4):964-970.

[7] Bas E. Surrogate relaxation of a fuzzy multidimensional 0-1 knapsack model by surrogate constraint normalization rules and a methodology for multi-attribute project portfolio selection[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 25(5):958-970.

[8] Liesiö J, Salo A. Scenario-based portfolio selection of investment projects with incomplete probability and utility information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 217(1):162-172.

[9] Perez F, Gomez T. Multiobjective project portfolio selection withfuzzy constraints[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2014,245(1):1-23.

[10] Huang Xiaoxia, Zhao Tianyi, Kudratova S. Uncertain mean-variance and mean-semivariance models for optimal project selection and scheduling[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 93:1-11.

[11] Bertsimas D, Sim M. The price of robustness[J]. Operations Research, 2004, 52(1):35-53.

[12] 陈涛, 黄钧, 朱建明. 基于信息更新的两阶段鲁棒-随机优化调配模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):67-77.

[13] Shen Ruijun, Zhang Shuzhong. Robust portfolio selection based on a multi-stage scenario tree[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 191(3):864-887.

[14] 赵昊天, 贾传亮, 宋砚秋, 等. 不确定需求下航空超售问题的鲁棒优化研究[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(S1):98-102.

[15] Hassanzadeh F, Nemati H, Sun Minghe. Robust optimization for interactive multiobjective programming with imprecise information applied to R&D project portfolio selection[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 238(1):41-53.

[16] Fliedner T, Liesiö J. Adjustable robustness for multi-attribute project portfolio selection[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 252(3):931-946.

[17] Hassanzadeh F, Modarres M, Nemati H R, et al. A robust R&D project portfolio optimization model for pharmaceutical contract research organizations[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 158:18-27.
文章导航

/