主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

顾客选择行为对自提点选址的影响研究

展开
  • 1. 西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院, 四川 成都 610031;
    2. 西安交通大学综合交通运输智能化国家地方联合工程实验室, 四川 成都 610031;
    3. 江苏大学管理学院, 江苏 镇江 212013

收稿日期: 2015-03-17

  修回日期: 2015-12-29

  网络出版日期: 2017-08-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472077,41501123);四川省软科学项目(2014ZR0032);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2682016CX058)

The Impact of Customers' Choice Behavior on Pickup Point Location

Expand
  • 1. School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;
    2. National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;
    3. School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Received date: 2015-03-17

  Revised date: 2015-12-29

  Online published: 2017-08-26

摘要

自提点选址是企业推广顾客自提模式和抢占末端配送市场份额的战略决策之一。与其它物流设施不同,自提点直接面向顾客,顾客可选择是否接受区域中自提点的服务。为使顾客自提量最大化,考虑顾客如何选择目标自提点是至关重要的。为此,考虑顾客取货距离和自提点吸引力等因素,基于竞争选址和逐渐覆盖理论,设计了顾客对自提点的分段效用函数。在此基础上,利用MNL模型和需求弹性函数分别构建了随机选择模型和最优选择模型。为高效地求解模型,设计了免疫算法,并用一个随机算例进行验证。结果显示,顾客选择行为对自提点选址有重要的影响,企业在作决策之前有必要详实地调查顾客的选择行为。

本文引用格式

陈义友, 张锦, 罗建强 . 顾客选择行为对自提点选址的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(5) : 135 -144 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.05.016

Abstract

Last mile delivery (LMD) problems have become increasingly prominent with the rapid development of e-commerce. And traditional home delivery service can't meet customers' demand. Pickup service provides customers with a more flexible distribution solution, gaining scale benefit of LMD and reducing the delivery pressure of the city logistics system. Pickup point location is a strategic decision for enterprises to broaden customers' pickup mode and promote market share of LMD. In contrast with other logistics facilities, pickup point is a direct terminal to customers, and customers have a choice in whether to receive service from pickup point in the region or not. In order to maximize the customers' total pickup demand, it is necessary to put emphasis on how customers choose the pickup points to patronize. To this end, assuming that customers' pickup distance and pickup points' attraction are two important attractiveness attributes considered by customers. Based on the competitive location and gradual coverage theory, a piecewise utility function between customer and pickup point is constructed. Under this circumstance, two alternative models are respectively presented with the MNL model and demand elasticity function:in the "probabilistic-choice model", a customer may patronize each pickup point with a certain probability, which increases with the attractiveness of available pickup point. In contrast, the "optimal-choice model" stipulates that each customer will go to the most attractive pickup point. Both models are formulated as a mixed-integer program. To solve the problems efficiently, an immune algorithm is proposed and a random example is used for verification. The results show that pickup point's coverage distance, customer rational degree and demand elasticity coefficient affect the location decisions. In particular, the comparison between the two models indicates that the choice behavior of the customer has a significant impact on the pickup point location decisions, and a thorough empirical investigation of this behavior prior to choosing a model is necessary.

参考文献

[1] Roper J, Marsden G. Valuing home delivery-Where's my stuff[M]//Marsden G.Wasted miles, wasted money (a less congested, more energy efficient future).Cambridge:CICC Publications, 2006:53-60.
[2] Morganti E, Dablanc L, Fortin F. Final deliveries for online shopping:The deployment of pickup point networks in urban and suburban areas[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2014,11:23-31.
[3] Fernie J, Sparks L, McKinnon A C. Retail logistics in the UK:Past, present and future[J]. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2010,38(11/12):894-914.
[4] McLeod F N, Cherrett T J. Quantifying the environmental benefits of collection/delivery points[J]. OR Insight, 2009,22(3):127-139.
[5] Esper T L, Jensen T D, Turnipseed F L, et al. The last mile:An examination of effects of online retail delivery strategies on consumers[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2003,24(2):177-203.
[6] Punakivi M, YrjoÈlaÈ H, HolmstroÈm J. Solving the last mile issue:Reception box or delivery box?[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 2001,31(6):427-439.
[7] 徐俊杰, 姜凌, 李亦亮. 基于服务驱动假说的消费者自提包裹选择意愿研究[J]. 管理学报, 2014,11(12):1850-1857.
[8] Weltevreden J W. B2C e-commerce logistics:The rise of collection-and-delivery points in The Netherlands[J]. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2008,36(8):638-660.
[9] 张戎, 王镇豪. 城市配送末端节点布局双层规划模型及算法[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2012,40(7):1035-1040.
[10] 杨朋珏, 胡昊, 王俊嘉, 等. 电子商务环境下城市配送末端网点选址模型研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2014,19(01):35-40.
[11] 周翔, 许茂增, 吕奇光. B2C模式下配送中心与末端节点的两阶段布局优化模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014,20(12):3140-3149.
[12] Zhang Yue, Berman O, Verter V. The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design[J]. OR Spectrum, 2012,34(2):349-370.
[13] 何波, 孟卫东. 考虑顾客选择行为的逆向物流网络设计问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009,17(06):104-108.
[14] 肖勇波, 吴鹏, 王雅兰. 基于顾客选择行为的多质量等级时鲜产品定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010,18(01):58-65.
[15] 徐兵, 熊志建. 基于顾客策略行为和缺货损失的供应链定价与订购决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015,23(05):48-55.
[16] Drezner Z, Wesolowsky G O, Drezner T. The gradual covering problem[J]. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 2004,51(6):841-855.
[17] Huff D L. Defining and estimating a trading area[J].Journal of Marketing,1964,28(3):34-38.
[18] Nakanishi M, Cooper L G. Parameter Estimation for a Multiplicative Competitive Interaction Model:Least Squares Approach[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1974,11(3):303-311.
[19] McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior[M]//Zarembka P. Frontiers in econometrics. New York:Academic Press, 1974:105-142.
[20] Haase K, Müller S. A comparison of linear reformulations for multinomial logit choice probabilities in facility location models[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014,232(3):689-691.
[21] Meyer R J. Context-induced parameter instability in a disaggregate-stochastic model of store choice[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1982,19(1):62-71.
[22] Aboolian R, Berman O, Krass D. Competitive facility location model with concave demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,181(2):598-619.
[23] Alp O, Erkut E, Drezner Z. An efficient genetic algorithm for the p-median problem[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2003,122(1-4):21-42.
[24] Hansen P, Mladenović N. Variable neighborhood search for the p-median[J]. Location Science, 1997,5(4):207-226.
[25] Yaghini M, Karimi M, Rahbar M. A hybrid metaheuristic approach for the capacitated p-median problem[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013,13(9):3922-3930.
[26] Chun J, Jung H, Hahn S. A study on comparison of optimization performances between immune algorithm and other heuristic algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1998,34(5):2972-2975.
[27] 汤旻安, 袁爽, 杨晓晓. 一种求解铁路应急供应车站选址问题的优化算法[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2014,23(04):31-37.
文章导航

/