主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

中国省域生态文明建设协调发展程度的综合评价

展开
  • 东北大学工商管理学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110169;东北评价中心, 辽宁 沈阳 110169

收稿日期: 2016-01-10

  修回日期: 2017-03-20

  网络出版日期: 2017-09-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71671031,71071030)

Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Provincial Ecological Civilization Coordinated Development Degree

Expand
  • School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China; Northeastern Comprehensive Center, Shenyang 110169, China

Received date: 2016-01-10

  Revised date: 2017-03-20

  Online published: 2017-09-25

摘要

针对当前生态发展严重滞后于经济、社会发展的现状,提出了一种衡量经济、社会、自然三个子系统协调发展的评价模型,即通过构建最优化指数及统一度指数来解决生态文明建设的协调评价问题。首先从经济、社会、自然三个子系统的角度选择指标体系;其次在子系统内部通过序关系分析法与算术加权平均算子,来确定各指标的权重及各子系统的综合评价值;再次通过指数构建模型得到最优化指数与统一度指数。在此基础上,根据上述构建的评价模型对我国及31个省市的生态文明建设的协调情况进行评价,并依据评价结果给出了相关的政策建议。

本文引用格式

柴琪宸, 郭亚军, 宫诚举, 李伟伟 . 中国省域生态文明建设协调发展程度的综合评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(7) : 184 -190 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.07.020

Abstract

In recent years, China puts ecological civilization construction as a national development of the layout, which shows that the CPC Central Committee attachs more importance to the construction of ecological civilization. Ecological civilization construction evaluation is one of the key links. At present, ecological development in China is seriously lagging behind the economic and social development. In view of this problem, an evaluation model is put forward to measure coordinated development degree of the three subsystems of economy, society and nature,in order to promote the development of economic, social and natural keep in harmony.
The healthy development of ecological civilization both needs a high level of comprehensive development and a high degree of coordinated development. In this paper, the optimal index is built to measure the comprehensive development level of each province, and the uniform index is built to measure the coordinated development degree of each province. Firstly, index system is constructed from the angle of the three subsystems which is the economic, social and natural system respectively. Secondly, in the subsystem, the weight of each index and the comprehensive evaluation value of each subsystem are calculated by order relation analysis method and arithmetic weighted average operator. Thirdly,the optimal index is constructed by calculating the mean distance between the comprehensive evaluation value and its minimum value of every province. The uniform index is constructed by calculating the logarithm of the distance between the three subsystems' evaluation values and their mean value. Finally,according to the statistical data of China Statistical Yearbook, China Statistical Digest and China Environmental Statistical Yearbook, using above-mentioned evaluation model, the coordinated development degree of ecological civilization construction of 31 provinces in China is evaluated.
The evaluation results show that the development level of the three subsystems of every province is in a state of unbalanced development, and the optimal degree index is negatively correlated with the degree of consistency index. The results also show that there is a certain relationship between the level of ecological civilization development and geographical distribution in China, and it is necessary to take different measures according to the characteristics of different regions.
Ecological civilization construction coordination level evaluation is a very complex question, and many factors need to be considered. However, the most important thing is to grasp the definition of the ecological civilization coordinated development. Considering the coordination level of ecological civilization construction from three subsystems of economy, society and nature, it not only requires the development level of the subsystems to be synchronized,but also requires the development of every subsystem should continue to improve. Therefore, the optimal index and uniform index are construeted to reflect the coordination level of ecological civilization construction. The method can also be applied to other subsystems. At the same time, the order relation analysis method is used to determine the weight of indexes in each subsystem, can express the experts' opinion simply and accurately. In addition, the evaluation method of statistical index analysis is advanced and flexible, in which the evaluation index system can be constructed, weight can be determined and information aggregation model can be chosen.

参考文献

[1] Liu Moucheng,Liu Xingchen,Yang Zhenshan. An integrated indicator on regional ecological civilization construction in China[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,2015,23(1):1-8.

[2] Liu Kebin,Li Yinghua,Wang Pengfei,et al. Research on the construction of domestic ecological civilization cities[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2013,734:1967-1970.

[3] Zhu Tan,Gao Shuai. Promoting circular developmentand recycling solid waste-In the view of ecological civilization construction[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2014,878:873-878.

[4] 彭张林,张强,王素凤.基于评价结论的二次组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(9):156-164.

[5] 李美娟,徐林明,陈国宏.基于一致性的动态组合评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(10):149-155.

[6] 杜娟,霍佳震. 交互式多属性群决策评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(11):120-128.

[7] 易平涛,李伟伟,郭亚军.泛综合评价信息集成框架求解算法及应用[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(10):131-138.

[8] 杜宇,刘俊昌.生态文明建设评价指标体系研究[J].科学管理研究,2009,27(3):60-63.

[9] Liu Yanjun,Zhang Baohua,Cao Jianrong,et al. Construction of evaluation system of provincial ecological civilization-A case of Shandong province,China[J]. Asian Agricultural Research,2009,1(10):5-8.

[10] 汪秀琼,谌跃龙,吴小节,等.广东省21个地级市生态文明发展状况综合评价与空间分异[J].科技管理研究,2015,(15):76-80.

[11] Zhang Xiaohong,Wang Yanqing,Qi Yan,et al. Evaluation the trends of China's ecological civilization construction using a novel indicator system[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,133:910-923.

[12] 成金华,陈军,李悦.中国生态文明发展水平测度与分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2013,30(7):36-50.

[13] 韩永辉,李青,邹建华.基于GPCA模型的中国省域生态文明治理评价研究[J].数理统计与管理,2016,35(4):603-613.

[14] Zhen Jianghong. Evaluation of the ecological civilization construction of inner mongolia[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials,2013,385:392-395.

[15] Leng Hui,Zhao Huaqing,Zhang Li,et al. Index system and evaluation of ecological civilization in county administrative areas-A case study of Haian[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2012,524:3578-3583.

[16] 关海玲.基于熵值法的城市生态文明发展水平评价的实证研究[J].工业技术经济,2015,(1):116-122.

[17] 王学军,郭亚军.基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):65-70.

[18] 中华人民共和国统计局.中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2014.
文章导航

/