主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

不同区制工业化水平下的石油消费分析——基于Path-STR模型的实证研究

展开
  • 1. 西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 陕西 西安 710126;
    2. 陕西师范大学国际商学院, 陕西 西安 710119;
    3. 中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院, 北京 100190;
    4. 香港城市大学管理科学系, 香港 999077

收稿日期: 2016-04-27

  修回日期: 2017-06-07

  网络出版日期: 2018-01-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71473155);陕西省青年科技新星计划项目(2016KJXX-14);西安电子科技大学基本科研业务费项目(JB160603)

Analysis of Oil Consumption under Different Regional Industrialization-An Empirical Study Based on Path-STR Model

Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China;
    2. InternationalBusiness School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China;
    3. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190,China;
    4. Department of Management Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received date: 2016-04-27

  Revised date: 2017-06-07

  Online published: 2018-01-31

摘要

经济的全球化、石油供需体系自身的复杂性使得石油消费和各影响因素之间的关系也变得复杂。本文从文献回顾和理论分析中得出影响石油消费的总量因素、结构因素和价格因素,基于1995年至2015年的数据进行通径分析,测算出各因素对石油消费的直接影响、间接影响以及总的影响程度,结果显示经济增长、工业化水平和国际原油价格是影响石油消费的主要因素。Johansen协整检验表明它们之间存在长期稳定关系,因此本文在此基础上运用平滑转换回归(STR)方法进一步对各因素的石油消费影响效应进行研究,得出如下结论:工业化与我国石油消费之间存在非线性关系,其明显的区间转换动态特征可用LSTR2模型来刻画。在加入了其它控制变量后,当滞后一期工业化水平处在低于-0.0045的低区制状态和高于0.0228的高区制状态时,工业化对石油消费产生抑制作用,此时的非线性特征最为明显;当滞后一期工业化水平处在两区制之间的中区制状态时,对石油消费的影响效应逐渐从负向抑制作用向稳定的线性正向促进作用转换。同时这种非线性关系使得经济-能源系统中的经济增长和国际油价对石油消费也产生复杂的影响。这为我国不同工业化时期在制定与节约能源、优化能源结构等相关政策时提供一定的依据。

本文引用格式

柴建, 梁婷, 周友洪, 汪寿阳, 黎建强 . 不同区制工业化水平下的石油消费分析——基于Path-STR模型的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(11) : 47 -57 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.11.005

Abstract

The economic globalization and the complexity of the oil demand-supply system complicate the relationship between oil consumption and its factors. In this paper the overall factor, structural factors and price factor which affect the oil consumption are obtained based on literature reviews and theoretical analysis. And then, the path analysis using the statistical data from 1995 to 2015 is applied to calculate the direct impact, indirect impact and total impact of the various factors on oil consumption, the results indicate that economic growth, industrialization and international crude oil prices are the main affect factors of oil consumption. And Johansen Co-integration test suggests that there is a long-term and stable relationship between these four variables. Next, the smooth transition regression (STR) method is employed to further examine the effect of factors on oil consumption and the following conclusion are drawn. Firstly, there is a nonlinear relationship between industrialization and oil consumption. Its obvious dynamic characteristics with regime conversion can be described by LSTR2 model perfectly. Secondly, when the first lagged industrialization dLnindt-1 is in the regime of below -0.0045 or in the high regime of above 0.0228, the first lagged industrialization have a negative impact on the oil consumption, which the nonlinear feature is most obvious. While the first lagged industrialization is in the mid-regime, the effect of industrialization on oil consumption is gradually shifted from the negative and passive influence to the stably linear and positive influence. The results also suggest that this nonlinear relationship makes economic growth and international oil price have a complex impact on oil consumption in economic-energy systems. This provides reference for our country to make economic policies adapting to energy conservation and energy structure optimization in different industrial period in China.

参考文献

[1] Moore A.Demand elasticity of oil in Barbados[J].Energy Policy,2011,39(6):3515-3519.

[2] Narayan P K, Smyth R. A panel cointegration analysis of the demand for oil in the Middle East[J]. Energy Policy,2007,35(12):6258-6265.

[3] Narayan P K, Wong P. A panel data analysis of the determinants of oil consumption:The case of Australia[J]. Applied Energy,2009,86(12):2771-2775.

[4] Zou Gaolu,Chau K W. Short-and long-run effects between oil consumption and economic growth in China[J]. Energy Policy,2006,34(18):3644-3655.

[5] 纪玉山,代栓平.中国石油消费的动态影响因素分析[J]. 经济与管理研究,2008,(1):26-30.

[6] Gallo A, Mason P, Shapiro S, et al. What is behind the increase in oil prices? Analyzing oil consumption and supply relationship with oil price[J]. Energy,2010,35(10):4126-4141.

[7] 张欢,成金华. 中国城市化进程对能源需求的动态冲击效应[J]. 管理学报,2011,8(7):1060-1066.

[8] 崔百胜, 朱麟. 基于内生增长理论与GVAR模型的能源消费控制目标下经济增长与碳减排研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1):11-20.

[9] Behmiri N B, Manso J R P. The linkage between crude oil consumption and economic growth in Latin America:The panel framework investigations for multiple regions[J].Energy,2014,72:233-241.

[10] Lin Boqiang, Xie Chunping.Estimation on oil demand and oil saving potential of China's road transport sector[J]. Energy Policy,2013,61:472-482.

[11] Zheng Yuhua, Luo Dongkun.Industrial structure and oil consumption growth path of China:Empirical evidence[J]. Energy,2013,57:336-343.

[12] Park S Y, Yoo S H.The dynamics of oil consumption and economic growth in Malaysia[J].Energy Policy, 2014,66:218-223.

[13] Mahadevan R, Asafu-Adjaye J. Energy consumption, economic growth and prices:A reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries[J]. Energy Policy,2007,35(4):2481-2490.

[14] Asafu-Adjaye J. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth:time series evidence from Asian developing countries[J]. Energy economics,2000,22(6):615-625.

[15] Kumar U, Jain V K. Time series models (Grey-Markov, Grey Model with rolling mechanism and singular spectrum analysis) to forecast energy consumption in India[J]. Energy,2010,35(4):1709-1716.

[16] Behrang M A, Assareh E, Ghalambaz M, et al. Forecasting future oil demand in Iran using GSA (Gravitational Search Algorithm)[J]. Energy,2011,36(9):5649-5654.

[17] 陈文静,何刚. 石油消费及其影响因素:基于非参数模型的研究[J]. 管理工程学报,2009,(4):170-173.

[18] Lee C C, Chiu Y B. Electricity demand elasticities and temperature:Evidence from panel smooth transition regression with instrumental variable approach[J]. Energy Economics,2011,33(5):896-902.

[19] 贺小莉,潘浩然. 基于PSTR模型的中国能源消费与经济增长非线性关系研究[J]. 中国人口.资源与环境,2013,23(12):84-89.

[20] 赵新刚, 刘平阔. 经济增长与能源强度:基于面板平滑转换回归模型的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014,22(6):013.

[21] 赵进文,范继涛. 经济增长与能源消费内在依从关系的实证研究[J]. 经济研究,2007,(8):31-42.

[22] Kani A H,AbbasspourbM, Abedi Z. Estimation of demand function for natural gas in Iran:Evidences based on smooth transition regression models[J]. Energy Modelling,2014,36:341-347.

[23] 吕魁.基于向量误差修正模型的石油需求预测实证检验[J].统计与决策,2009,(10):66-68.

[24] Jones D W. How urbanization affects energy-use in developing countries[J]. Energy Policy.1991,19(7):621-629.

[25] Halkos G E, Tzeremes N G.Oil consumption and economic efficiency:A comparative analysis ofadvanced, developing and emerging economies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011,70(7):1354-1362.

[26] Jiang Zhujun, Lin Boqing. China's energy demand and its characteristics in the industrialization and urbanization process[J].Energy Policy, 2012,49:608-615.

[27] 西蒙·库兹涅茨. 现代经济增长[M].北京:商务出版社,1989.

[28] Wright S. Correlation and causation[J]. Journal of agricultural research, 1921, 20(7):557-585.

[29] Chai Jian, Guo Jue, Meng Lei,et al. Exploring the core factors and its dynamic effects on oil price:An application on path analysis and BVAR-TVP model[J]. Energy policy, 2011,39(12):8022-8036.

[30] Tersvirta T. Modelling economic relationships with smooth transition regressions[R]. Working Paper Stockholm School of Economics, 1996.

[31] Granger C W J, Tersvirta T. Modelling non-linear economic relationships[M]. Oxfor:oxford University Press, 1993.
文章导航

/