主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

水环境安全评价方法及其在京津冀地区的应用

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院, 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院预测科学研究中心, 北京 100190;
    3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    4. 中国科学院管理、决策与信息系统重点实验室, 北京 100190

收稿日期: 2016-09-28

  修回日期: 2017-05-26

  网络出版日期: 2018-05-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71173210);中国科学院重点部署资助项目

Assessment Method on Water Environment Security and Its Application in Jing-Jin-Ji Region

Expand
  • 1. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. Center for Forecasting Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    4. Key Laboratory of Management, Decision and Information Systems, CAS, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 2016-09-28

  Revised date: 2017-05-26

  Online published: 2018-05-24

摘要

为了克服模糊综合评价方法中的权重选取以及最大最小算法导致的信息缺失问题,本文提出一种改进的模糊综合评价方法。首先以熵权法、灰色关联分析法以及主成分分析法为基础,建立组合权重模型;其次,在加权平均原则下引入综合评分方法进行评价得到最终评价结果。从经济社会、水质状况和资源条件三个方面出发,初步建立了包含17个指标的水环境安全评价体系。利用主成分分析法对初步建立的指标体系进行了筛选,最终确定了13个指标作为评价指标。在筛选之后的指标体系下,用改进的模糊综合评价法对北京、天津、河北以及京津冀地区总体的水环境安全进行了评价,给出了2006-2014年间各地区水环境安全变化情况,结果显示京津冀地区水环境安全基本呈现北京优于河北优于天津的趋势;京津冀地区总体的水环境安全呈现先变好再变差的趋势。森林覆盖率是水环境安全最主要的影响因素,其次是第三产业占GDP的比重、人均水资源量以及Ⅰ-Ⅲ类水质占比。弹性系数分析表明,这四个指标的改善也是对京津冀地区水环境安全提高最有效的措施。最后,根据对评价结果的分析,提出了提高京津冀水环境安全的一些建议。

本文引用格式

刘秀丽, 涂卓卓 . 水环境安全评价方法及其在京津冀地区的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(3) : 160 -168 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.03.017

Abstract

To overcome the disadvantages of weight selection and information missing in the evaluation, an improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is proposed in this paper. First, the combined weight model which is based on entropy method, grey relational analysis method and principal component analysis is established. Then, with the weighted average principle, a technique of synthetic grade is introduced to evaluate the result. Our improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method can avoid the impact of subjective factors on the determination of weights of the indexes and reflect the contribution of every index to the evaluation result more objectively. Jing-Jin-Ji region is now threatened by the increasingly serious water environmental security problems which adversely affects human health and imposes a limit on social and economic development. Based on this background, it is of practical and theoretical significance to study the water environment security in Jing-Jin-Ji region and explore effective control measures, which is a major task of realizing Jing-Jin-Ji integration. In this paper, an evaluation index system of water environment security is initially established from three respects:economic society, water quality and resource conditions, which included 17 indicators. Then the principal component analysis method is applied to screen the index system, and 13 indexes are selected as final assessment indexes. Based on the screened index system, we apply this improved method to the water environment security assessment in Jing-Jin-Ji region with data from Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei Annual Water Resources Bulletin during 2006-2014. The results show that the water environment security in Jing-Jin-Ji region became better from 2006 to 2012, then got worse. The order of water environment security in three regions was Beijing, Hebei and Tianjin. Among the 13 indicators, the principal influence factors of water environment security are forest coverage rate, the proportion of tertiary industry in GDP, per capital water resources and the proportion of class Ⅰ-Ⅲ water quality. The elasticity coefficient analysis shows that to improve these four factors was also the most effective way in improving water environment security in Jing-Jin-Ji region.

参考文献

[1] 张翔, 夏军, 贾绍凤. 水安全定义及其评价指数的应用[J]. 资源科学, 2005, 27(3):145-149.

[2] 韩宇平, 阮本清. 区域水安全评价指标体系初步研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2003, 23(2):267-272.

[3] 陈绍金. 水安全概念辨析[J]. 中国水利, 2004, (17):13-15.

[4] 曾畅云, 李贵宝, 傅桦. 水环境安全及其指标体系研究——以北京市为例[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2004, 2(4):31-35.

[5] Zhu Lin, Lu Hongxing. An qverall evaluation of surface water quality by fuzzy method[J]. Water Resources & Water Engineering, 1994, 2.

[6] Pan Feng, Fu Qiang, Liang Chuan. Applying fuzzy synthesize judgement in the study of water environment quality evaluation[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2002, 20(2):58-62.

[7] Zhang Bing, Song Xianfang, Zhang Yinghua, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment of surface water and groundwater in Songnen plain, Northeast China[J]. Water research, 2012, 46(8):2737-2748.

[8] Fan Baodong. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for groundwater quality[J]. China Rural Nater and Hydropower, 1998, 9:008.

[9] 汤丽华, 赵吴静, 金菊良,等. 基于熵的水质综合评价的相似插值模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, 14(S1):91-94.

[10] Zou Zhihong, Yi Yun, Sun Jingnan. Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2006, 18(5):1020-1023.

[11] Liu Li, Zhou Jianzhong, An Xueli, et al. Using fuzzy theory and information entropy for water quality assessment in Three Gorges region, China[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(3):2517-2521.

[12] 崔杰, 党耀国, 刘思峰. 基于灰色关联度求解指标权重的改进方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(5):141-145.

[13] 韩小孩, 张耀辉, 孙福军,等. 基于主成分分析的指标权重确定方法[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2012, 33(10):124-126.

[14] 陈建明, 张仲义. 模糊方法在信息系统评价中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2000, 8(1):75-80.

[15] 陈晓红, 杨志慧. 基于改进模糊综合评价法的信用评估体系研究——以我国中小上市公司为样本的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1):146-153.

[16] Wang Haiyan. Assessment and prediction of overall environmental quality of Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 66(3):329-340.

[17] 苏为华. 模糊综合评价合成过程中"取小取大" 算子的不合理性及改进[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2003, (4):32-36.

[18] 卢厚涛, 袁辉, 刘华丽, 等. 模糊综合评价取大取小算法的改进[J]. 解放军理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2013, 13(6):679-683.

[19] 李玉琳, 高志刚, 韩延玲. 模糊综合评价中权值确定和合成算子选择[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2006, 42(23):38-42.

[20] 何贝贝, 李绍飞, 朱习爱. 天津市水环境安全评价及其指标体系研究[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(1):125-129.

[21] 路瑞, 赵越, 续衍雪,等. 从水污染防治角度出发的全国分省域水环境安全研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2016, 8(3):48-52.

[22] 潘峰, 付强. 模糊综合评价在水环境质量综合评价中的应用研究[J]. 环境工程, 2002, 20(2):58-60.

[23] Zhang C, Liu W, Su Z, et al. Index system and method for assessing water environment security of Luan River-Tianjin Water diversion project[C]//20104th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE). IEEE, Chengdu, 2010:1-5.

[24] 刘永叶. 长江流域水环境安全及其评价指标体系初探[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2007.

[25] Li Lu, Shi Zhihua, Yin Wei, et al. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou reservoir area, China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220(23):3439-3447.

[26] 曾嵘, 魏一鸣, 范英, 等. 北京市人口, 资源, 环境与经济协调发展分析与评价指标体系[J]. 中国管理科学, 2000,8(S1):310-317.

[27] 沈珍瑶, 杨志峰. 黄河流域水资源可再生性评价指标体系与评价方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(2):188-197.

[28] 代倩倩. 河北省水环境安全及其评价体系构建[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2011.

[29] 陈洪海, 迟国泰. 基于信息显著性差异的绿色产业评价指标筛选模型及实证[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014,23(6):193-204.

[30] GB3838-2002,地表水环境质量标准, 2002.

[31] Dong Deng, Li Yijie. Application of rough set and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in water quality assessment[C]//International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Wuhan, 2010:126-128.

[32] 梁小珍, 刘秀丽, 杨丰梅. 考虑资源环境约束的我国区域生猪养殖业综合生产能力评价[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(9):2263-2270.

[33] Zou Qingrong, Liu Xiuli. Economic effects analysis of seawater desalination in China with input-output technology[J]. Desalination, 2016, 380:18-28.

[34] 李香云. 京津冀协同发展中的流域管理问题与对策建议[J]. 水利发展研究, 2016, 16(5):1-3.
文章导航

/