主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

个体与机构投资者,谁左右A股股价变化?——基于投资者异质信念的视角

展开
  • 1. 西南交通大学经济管理学院, 四川 成都 610031;
    2. 重庆理工大学经济金融学院, 重庆 400054

收稿日期: 2016-09-22

  修回日期: 2017-04-24

  网络出版日期: 2018-06-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71473206,71773100);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC790066);重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目(17SKG139)

Individual Investor or Institutional Investor, Who Dominates Asset Pricing in Chinese A-share Stock Market?

Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;
    2. School of Economics and Finance, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China

Received date: 2016-09-22

  Revised date: 2017-04-24

  Online published: 2018-06-22

摘要

在成熟的资本市场,机构投资者一直都被视作资产定价的主体。但在个体投资者众多的中国证券市场,个体投资者与机构投资者谁左右A股股价的变化?则是人们关注的热点话题。本文从投资者异质信念的视角,构建个体投资者与机构投资者未预期交易量两个异质信念测度指标,对比分析二者与股票收益的相关性。结果表明,个体投资者与机构投资者的异质信念与股票当期收益显著正相关、与未来一期收益显著负相关,但个体投资者异质信念的作用更强;进一步,异质信念对小公司、价值型公司收益的影响更明显;当控制了规模、价值等风险因子,以及不同时间区间和是否可以卖空等市场影响因素后,结论依然成立。表明在现阶段的中国A股市场,个体投资者的异质信念仍是左右股票定价的主要因素。

本文引用格式

刘燕, 朱宏泉 . 个体与机构投资者,谁左右A股股价变化?——基于投资者异质信念的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(4) : 120 -130 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.04.014

Abstract

In the mature capital market, the institutional investors have been regarded as an important factor in asset pricing. In China, the proportion of individual investors is more than 99.6%. An individual investor or an institutional investor, who has more influence on A-share stock?The answer is becoming important in asset pricing efficiency in Chinese A-share stock market. The investors' heterogeneous belief is one of the key factors in asset pricing. In this paper, the individual investors' unexpected trading volume (HBR_I) and the institutional investors' unexpected trading volume (HBR_B) are employed as proxies for heterogeneous belief, and uncovers the relationship between the two proxies and stock returns in Chinese A-share stock market. The result shows that stock returns are more significantly related to the individual investor unexpected trading volume than the institutional investors' unexpected trading volume even if considering the factors of size, book-to-market and short-sale constraint. Our findings suggest that the individual investors' heterogeneous beliefs can explain the stock return effectively in Chinese A-share stock markets.

参考文献

[1] Basak S. Asset pricing with heterogeneous beliefs[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2005, 29(11):2849-2881.

[2] 张维,张永杰.异质信念、卖空限制与风险资产价格[J].管理科学学报, 2006(4):58-64.

[3] Hong H, Stein J C. Disagreement and the stock market[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007, 21(2):109-128.

[4] Miller E M. Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1977, 32(4):1151-1168.

[5] Goetzmann W N, Massa M. Dispersion of opinion and stock returns[J]. Journal of Financial Markets, 2005, 8(3):324-349.

[6] Diether K B, Malloy C J, Scherbina A. Differences of opinion and the cross-section of stock returns[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(5):2113-2141.

[7] Chen Lin, Qin Lu, Zhu Hongquan. Opinion divergence, unexpected trading volume and stock returns:Evidence from China[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2015, 36:119-127.

[8] Yu Jialin. Disagreement and return predictability of stock portfolios[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 99(1):162-183.

[9] Boehme R D, Danielsen B R, Sorescu S M. Short-sale constraints, differences of opinion, and overvaluation[J]. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2006, 41(02):455-487.

[10] Garfinkel J A, Sokobin J. Volume, opinion divergence, and returns:A study of post-earnings announcement Drift[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2006, 44(1):85-112.

[11] Qin Lu, Zhu Hongquan. Efficiency of heterogeneity measures:An asset pricing perspective[J]. China Finance Review International, 2015,5(4):371-385.

[12] 朱宏泉,余江,陈林.异质信念、卖空限制与股票收益——基于中国证券市场的分析[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(7):115-126.

[13] Kaniel R, Saar G, Titman S. Individual investor trading and stock returns[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(1):273-310.

[14] Lee B S, Li Wei, Wang S S.The dynamics of individual and institutional trading on the Shanghai Stock Exchange[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2010, 18(1):116-137.

[15] Allen F, Litov L, Mei Jianping. Large investors, price manipulation, and limits to arbitrage:An anatomy of market corners[J].Review of Finance, 2006, 10(4):645-693.

[16] 徐浩峰,朱松. 机构投资者与股市泡沫的形成[J]. 中国管理科学,2012,20(4):18-26.

[17] 潘宁宁,朱宏泉.基金持股与交易行为对股价联动的影响分析-基于中国证券市场的数据[J].管理科学学报.2015,18(3):90-103.

[18] Qian Xiaolin. Small investor sentiment, differences of opinion and stock overvaluation[J].The Journal of Financial Markets,2014, 19:219-246.

[19] Hvidkjaer S. Small trades and the cross-section of stock returns[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2008,21(3):1123-1151.

[20] 陈志娟,郑振龙.个人投资者交易行为研究——来自台湾股市的证据[J].经济研究,2011,(S1):67-79.

[21] 刘维奇, 刘新新. 个人和机构投资者情绪与股票收益——基于上证A股市场的研究[J].管理科学学报, 2014, 17(3):70-87.

[22] 陈鹏程,周孝华. 机构投资者私人信息、散户投资者情绪与IPO首日回报率[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(4):37-44.

[23] Barber B M, Odean T. All that glitters:the effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2008, 21(2):785-818.

[24] Liu Xiaohui, Natarajan R. The effect of financial analysts' strategic behavior on analysts' forecast dispersion[J]. The Accounting Review, 2012, 87(6):2123-2149.

[25] Garfinkel J A. Measuring investors' opinion divergence[J].Journal of Accounting Research,2009, 47(5):1317-1348.

[26] 吴忠群,张群群. 市场信息效率理论的新进展[J]. 经济学动态,2012,(5):129-136.
文章导航

/