主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

基于企业转型目标的产品组合策略选择模型

展开
  • 西安建筑科技大学管理学院, 陕西 西安 710054

收稿日期: 2016-10-18

  修回日期: 2017-08-27

  网络出版日期: 2018-09-20

基金资助

教育部人文社科基金项目(15YJ910002);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划-重点项目(2015JZ010)

Product Portfolio Strategy Selection Model-Based on Transformation Objectives

Expand
  • School of Management, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China

Received date: 2016-10-18

  Revised date: 2017-08-27

  Online published: 2018-09-20

摘要

在产业升级的背景下,企业面临转型的机遇和任务。当前企业转型的经济转化能力较弱,其主要原因是企业忽略了转型目标与产品组合策略相匹配的重要作用。本文提出转型目标一致性的概念来衡量产品组合策略与转型目标的匹配程度,基于模糊DEA方法构建了基于转型目标一致的产品组合策略选择模型。以产业相关转型的企业为对象进行实例分析,验证了模型的可操作性。具有转型目标一致性的产品组合策略更能满足企业转型发展的需要,创造更好的经济和社会效益。模型为企业成功转型和制定相应的产品组合策略提供了指导意见。

本文引用格式

杨瑛哲, 黄光球 . 基于企业转型目标的产品组合策略选择模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(7) : 179 -186 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.07.019

Abstract

In the background of industrial upgrading,enterprises are faced with the opportunities and tasks of transformation. At present,the economic transformation ability of enterprise transformation is relatively weak. The possible reason may be that they lack of consideration for coordination relationship between the transformation objectives and product portfolio strategy. In this case,the concept of transformation target fit is used to measure the match degree of product portfolio strategy and transformation objectives,and a product portfolio strategy selection model is constructed based on the transformation by using the fuzzy DEA method. The validity of this model is verified by using an instance analysis of industrial transformation enterprise. The product portfolio strategy with the consistency of the transformation target can better meet the needs of the enterprise transformation,creating better economic and social benefits. The model provides the guidance for enterprise transformation and product portfolio strategy in the same time.

参考文献

[1] 杨皖苏,杨善林. 基于社会环境信任度调节效应的中西方企业价值观念、推崇策略与企业绩效关系研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(1):49-58.

[2] 马浩. 战略管理-商业模式创新[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2015.

[3] Linton J D, Walsh S T, Morabito J. Analysis,ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio[J]. R & D Management,2010,32(2):139-148.

[4] Yu Lean,Wang Shouyang,Wen Fenghua,et al. Genetic algorithm based muliti-criteria project portfolio selection[J]. Analysis of operations research,2012,197(1):71-86.

[5] 高学鸿,杨玉中,张晓娜. 基于粗集复合模糊物元的多产品组合生产目标贴近度研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2017,26(5):194-199.

[6] 贾凡,王兴元. 新产品属性组合决策BWM-RST方法[J]. 软科学,2016,30(6):109-113.

[7] 杨颖,杨善林,胡小建. 基于战略一致性的新产品开发项目组合选择[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2014,34(4):964-970.

[8] 白思俊,王续伯,梁斌. 基于战略导向的项目组合选择优化研究[J].运筹与管理,2016,25(1):70-75.

[9] 寿涌毅,王承超,李盈,等. 资源受限项目组合选择及调度的双层决策方法[J]. 系统管理学报,2014,23(4):489-494.

[10] 李林,袭勇. 匹配企业发展战略的核心项目组合选择[J]. 统计与决策,2014,(16):168-171.

[11] 杨鑫. 基于战略目标的项目组合选择研究[J]. 科学管理研究,2014,(7):213-216.

[12] Heckel R,Ehrig H,Wolter U,et al. The social construction of reputation:Certification contests,legitimation,and the survival of organizations in the american automobile industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2010,15(S1):29-44.

[13] 夏云风. 商业模式创新与战略转型[M]. 北京:新华出版社,2011.

[14] Chandrasekaran D,Tellis G J. A critical review of marketing research on diffusion of new products[J]. Review of Marketing Research,2015,3(1):39-80.

[15] 吴晓云,张欣妍. 企业能力、技术创新和价值网络创新与企业绩效[J]. 管理科学,2015,28(6):12-26.

[16] Wei Zelong,Yang Dong,Sun Biao,et al.The fit between technological innovation and business model design for firm growth:Evidence from China[J]. R&D Management,2014,44(3):288-305.

[17] Gallouj F,Windrum P. Services and innovation[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2009,19(2):141-148.

[18] Schnieder J M,Wilson R. Using analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection[J]. Information and Management,1991,20(5):87-95.

[19] Fishburn P C,Lavalle I H. Binary interactions and subset choice[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1996,92(1):182-192.

[20] 陶莎, 盛昭瀚,朱建波. 交互作用不确定下的项目组合选择鲁棒决策[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(4):190-196.

[21] 白礼彪,白思俊,张以彬. 基于阶段耦合的项目组合配置战略贴近度[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(3):68-75.

[22] 管玉娟. 新兴技术企业产品创新与商业模式创新的组合对企业绩效的影响[J]. 中国科技论坛,2015,(8):78-85.

[23] Mcwilliams A,Siegel D S. Creating and capturing value:Strategic corporate social responsibility,resource-based theory,and sustainable competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management,2011,37(5):1480-1495.

[24] Visnjic I,Looy B V. Servitization:Disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on the performance of manufacturing firms[J]. Journal of Operations Management,2013,31(4):169-180.

[25] 李星梅,王雅娴,刘再领,等. 考虑风险因素的可打断项目组合选择问题[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,23(s1):297-300.

[26] 何小雨,杨璐萍,昊韬,等. 群层次分析法和证据推理法在绿色建筑评价中的应用[J]. 系统工程,2016,34(2):76-81.

[27] 王刚, 汪杨,王珏,等. 基于证据分组合成的企业数据治理评价研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(6):1505-1516.

[28] 郜建人,姜红,孟卫军. 基于模糊DEA的房地产项目组合选择[J]. 建筑经济,2014,(5):56-59.

[29] Vandermerwe S,Rada J. Servitization of business:Adding value by adding services[J]. European Management Journal,2011,6(4):314-324.

[30] 杨瑛哲,黄光球. 技术变迁主导下企业转型评价的粗糙集方法研究[J]. 模糊系统与数学,2016,31(3):159-167.

[31] 于克信,谢佩洪. 转型期中国企业多元化经营的制度根源及范式构建研究[J]. 管理世界,2011,(7):180-181.
文章导航

/