[1] Bork robert H..The antitrust Paradox:A Policy at War with Itself[M].New York,Basic Book Inc.Publishers,1978,195-196. [2] Lande Robert H..Challenges to The Chicago School Approach:Chicago's s False Foundation:Wealth Transfer(Not Just Efficiency)Should Guide Antitrust[J].Antitrust Law Journal,1989,58:631-648. [3] Lande Robert H..Wealth Transfers as the Orginal and Primary Concern of Antitrust:The Efficiency interpretation Challenged[J].Hastings Law Review ,1999,50:871-957. [4] Lande Robert H..Proving The Obvious:The Antitrust laws Were Passed to Protect Consumers(Not just to Increase Efficiency)[J].Hastings Law Review,1999,50:959-968. [5] Shapiro Carl,Mergers with Differentiated products[J]. Antitrust ABA,1996,54:461-484. [6] Martin Stephen,Advanced industrial Economics[M].Blackwell Publishers,1993,74. [7] Posner,Richard.A,The Next Step in Antitrust Treatemnt of Restricted Distribution:Per Se Legality[J]. University of Chicago Law Review,1981,48:321-347. [8] Royall M.Sean,Symposium:Post-Chicago Economics:Editor's Note[J].Antitrust Law Journal,1995,69:445-487. [9] Schmalensee R.Another Look at Market Power in Antitrust[J].Harvard Law Review,1982,95:1787-1805. [10] Werden Gregory J.A Robust Test for Consumer Welfare Enhancing Mergers Among Sellers of Differenttated Products[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1996,XLIV:439-413. [11] Werden Gregory J.A Robust Test for Consumer Welfare Enhancing Mergers Among Wellers of Homogeneous Product[J].Economics Letters,1998,58:367-369. [12] Werden Gregory J.Simulating Unilateral Competitive Effects from Differentiated Products Mergers[J].1997,11:27-30. |