基于非均匀性语言标度和DLWA算子的动态绩效模糊群决策研究

Abstract

Abstract: Considering the uncertainty, randomness, fuzziness of data raised from functional management's annual performance assessment and excellent selection process in enterprises' HRM system. This article aims to optimize performance assessment activities in Functional Management by designing a quarterly multi-dimensional fuzzy evaluation system and adopting term-wise and qualitative evaluation method which is based on non-uniformity additive linguistic evaluation scale, a constructing dynamic additive linguistic judgment matrix model is constructed to optimize performance assessment activities in functional management.Using linguistic information aggregation operators like DLWA, subjects' evaluation data in various performance indicators and different period and different subjects' preference degree are integrated, all of which can reflect function management departments' performance comprehensively.

Key words: fuzzy assessment, DLWA operator, preferences, group decision, performance appraisal

CLC Number:

F272.92

YU Shun-kun, WANG Qiao-lian. Research on Dynamic Performance Fuzzy Assessment in Group Decision Making based on Non-uniformity Additive Linguistic Evaluation Scale and DLWA Operator[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(5): 115-120.

References

[1] 加里·德斯勒.人力资源管理(第十版)[M].曾湘泉,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[2] 康士勇,马维福.薪酬设计——绩效考核与薪酬支付[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2006.
[3] 刘枫. 企业职能部室人员激励初探 [J]. 中国人才, 2001(09):38-39.
[4] 桂莉. 职能部门绩效考核改革思路 [J]. 中国人力资源开发,2004(07):69-71.
[5] 汪克夷,董艳蕊,张爽. X通信公司绩效考核失效及其对策的案例探析 [J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2008,(06):54-57.
[6] 汪雪红. 职能部门绩效考核存在的问题与解决策略 [J]. 北京劳动保障职业学院学报,2008,2(03):24-27.
[7] 郭京生,袁家海,刘博.绩效管理制度设计与运作 [M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2012.
[8] Delgado M,Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E,et al. Combining numerical and linguistic information in group decision making [J].Information Science,1998,107(1):107-194.
[9] Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E,Verdegay J L. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessment [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996,79:73-87.
[10] Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection proeess in group decision making with linguistic assessment[J]. Information Science,1995,85:233-239.
[11] 魏翠萍,冯向前,张玉忠.语言判断矩阵的满意一致性检验方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(1):104-110.
[12] 徐泽水.基于模糊语言评估和GIOWA算子的多属性群决策方法[J].系统科学与数学,2004,24(2):218-224.
[13] 徐泽水.基于语言评估标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J].系统工程学报,2005,20(1):84-88.
[14] 许叶军,达庆利. 基于不同粒度语言判断矩阵的多属性群决策方法[J]. 管理工程学报, 2009,23(02):69-73.
[15] 燕蜻,梁吉业. 混合多属性群决策中的群体一致性分析方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011,19(06):133-140.
[16] 蒋宏兰. 基于模糊多属性群决策的供应商选择方法研究[J]. 价值工程, 2010,29(08):21-22.
[17] 张尧,樊治平. 权重信息不完全的不确定语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版) , 2010,31(04):597-600.
[18] 李琳,刘雅奇,李双刚. 一种群决策专家客观权重确定的改进方法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2011,20(04):77-81.
[19] 刘健,刘思峰,周献中,等. 多属性决策决问题的满意度与赋权研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011,19(06):126-132.
[20] 左军.层次分析法中判断矩阵的间接给出法[J].系统工程,1998,6(6):56-63.
[21] 徐泽水.层次分析析中构造判断矩阵的新方法[J].系统工程,1997(增刊):204-206.
[22] 徐泽水.层次分析新标度法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(10):74-77.
[23] Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1980.
[24] 汪浩,马达.层次分析标度评价与新标度法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1993,13(5):24-26.
[25] 侯岳衡,沈德家.指数标度及其与几种标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(10),43-46.
[26] 徐泽水. 关于层次分析中几种标度的模拟评估[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2000,(07) :58-62.
[27] 徐泽水. 基于语言标度中术语指标的多属性群决策法[J]. 系统工程学报, 2005,20(01):84-88.
[28] 戴跃强,徐泽水,李琰,等. 语言信息评估新标度及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008,16(02):145-149.
[29] 姜艳萍,樊治平.基于判断矩阵的决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[30] 徐泽水.基于语言信息的决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[31] Xu Z S.On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operaters[J]. International Journal of General Systems,2006,35(1):17-28.
[32] 徐泽水.不确定多属性决策方法及应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
[33] Xu Zeshui.Dynamic linguistic preference relations and their use in multi-period decision making[C].Proceedings of 2007 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering,Harbin,China,August 20-22,2007,345-350.
[34] 徐泽水.层次分析新标度法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(10):74-77.
[35] 尤天慧,张尧、樊治平,等.信息不完却确定的多指标决策理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.

Research on Dynamic Performance Fuzzy Assessment in Group Decision Making based on Non-uniformity Additive Linguistic Evaluation Scale and DLWA Operator

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Ruxin Nie,Zhangpeng Tian,Heming Liang. A Consensus Method for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Based on Behavior Management under Social Network Environments [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(9): 35-47.
[2]	Yang Jiao,Gang Li,Jianping Li,Bin Wang,Zhipeng Zhang. Research on the Weighting Method for Group Decision Considering Effective Information of Experts [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 107-116.
[3]	Haolun Wang. Spent Power Battery Recycling Technology Selection Based on Integrated CoCoSo and Heronian Mean with Intuitionistic Linguistic Rough Number [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 24-37.
[4]	Lisheng Jiang,Huchang Liao. Risk-efficiency Mixed Consensus Model Considering Consensus Efficiency and Misjudgment Risk [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 23-30.
[5]	Xun-jie GOU,Fu-min DENG,Ze-shui XU. The Application of the Large-scale Group Consensus Decision-making Method Based on Self-confident Double Hierarchy Linguistic Preference Relations [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 222-232.
[6]	LINGHU Da-zhi, WU Xin-li, LI Yi-na, YEI Fei. Impact Mechanism of Low-carbon Classification Standards on Carbon Emission Decisions of Heterogeneous Corporate [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(4): 46-55.
[7]	LIU Da, WANG Sheng-yan, ZHANG Hui-ping, ZHAO Xu-dong. Multi-Attribute Reverse Auction Considering the Regret and Disappointment Aversion of Bid Evaluation Experts [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(3): 196-206.
[8]	ZHU Xing-zhen, LI Li, ZHANG Hua, HE Xiang, HU Jiao. Online Video Platform and Advertiser Decisions with the Difference in Consumer Preference [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 216-225.
[9]	XU Xuan-hua, MA Zhi-peng, CHEN Xiao-hong. Dynamic Evolution Research on Emergency Decision Quality of Large Group Based on the Public Preferences Big Data [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 140-149.
[10]	WAN Zhi-yuan, LIU Qin-ming, YE Chun-ming, LIU Wen-yi. Research on Hospital Emergency Group Decision Model under Unexpected Events [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 254-262.
[11]	LUO Peng-fei, DUAN Yi-zhu, ZHANG Yong. Dynamic Investment Policy with Time-inconsistent Entrepreneur [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(1): 54-63.
[12]	PENG You, LIU Xiao-he, SUN Jian-bo. Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Approach Based on the Hesitancy Degrees and Correlation Coefficient [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(8): 229-240.
[13]	LIU Pei-de, TENG Fei. Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Consensus Model and ORESTE Method for Extended Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(3): 199-209.
[14]	LI Lei, ZHANG Shu-yang. Aggregation Method of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers with Minimized Maximal Compromise under Consensus Condition [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 168-176.
[15]	WANG Ze-zhou, CHEN Yun-xiang, XIANG Hua-chun. Research on an Improved Expert Cluster Weighting Method Based on Fuzzy Kernel Clustering [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 177-183.