产业生命周期不同阶段的最优集体创新网络结构

Abstract

Abstract: The optimistic structures of collective innovation networks in different stages of industry life circle with simulation methods are explored in this paper. The result shows that in the initial stage of industry life circle, regular networks with high average clustering coefficient are the most efficient for innovation; In the growth stage of industry life circle, small-world networks with high small-world coefficient are the most efficient for innovation; In the developed stage of industry life circle, random networks with low average path lengths are the most efficient for innovation. With further analysis, the reasons of these results are discovered,which are divided into three hierarchies as below. Firstly, knowledge features and technical opportunities are different in different stages of industry life circle. Secondly, knowledge features influence the flows of knowledge and determines enterprises' ability of recombination of knowledge, whereas technical opportunities influence the seeking and discovering of innovation opportunities by enterprise. Thirdly, high average clustering coefficients of structures conduce to better knowledge flows, whereas short average shortest path lengths make innovation opportunities easier to find. At last, some important advices are proposed to innovation policy makers.

Key words: industry life circle, collective innovation, network structure, efficiency

CLC Number:

F270

HUA Lei, WANG Wen-ping. Optimistic Structures of Collective Innovation Networks in Different Stages ofIndustry Life Circle[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(5): 129-140.

References

[1] Nelson R R. The simple economics of basic scientific research [J].Journal of Political Economy,1959,67:297-306.
[2] Nelson R R. The link between science and invention: the case of the transistor[M]//The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1962.
[3] Nordhaus W D. Invention, growth and welfare: a theoretical treatment of technological change[M]. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1969.
[4] Allen R. Collective invention[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.1983,4:1-24.
[5] McGaw J A. Most wonderful machine: mechanization and social change in berkshire paper making[M]//Princeton:Princeton University Press,1987:1801-1885.
[6] Von Hippel E. The source of innovation[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1988.
[7] Powel W, Koput K W,Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1996, 41:116-145.
[8] Saxenian A. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1996.
[9] Gulati R, Sytch M, Tatarynowicz A. The rise and fall of small worlds: exploring the dynamics of social structure [J]. Organization Science,2012,23(2):449-471.
[10] Boudreau K. Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving control [J]. Management Science,2010,56(10):1849-1872.
[11] Ghosh R. Cooking pot makers: an economic model for the trade in free goods and services on the internet[EB/OL]. First Monday,1998,3(3). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue33/ghosh/index.html.
[12] Schumpeter J. Business cycles[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1939.
[13] Henderson R, Clark K B. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35:9-13.
[14] Aldrich H. Organizations Evolving [M]. London:Sage Publications,2000.
[15] Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search [J]. Management Science,2001,47(1): 117-132.
[16] Tihanyi L, Johnson R A, Hoskisson R E, et al. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: the effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity[J]. The Academy of Management Journal,2003,46(2):195-211.
[17] Cowan R, Jonard N, Ozman M. Knowledge dynamics in a network industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2004,71:469-484.
[18] Cowan R. Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion[M].Maastricht:MERIT Research Memorandum,2004.
[19] Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D[J]. Economic Journal, 1989, (99) :569-596.
[20] Cowan R, Foray D. The Economics of codification and the diffusion of knowledge [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,1997,6(3):595-622.
[21] Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann J B. The joint dynamics of networks and knowledge[M]//Cowan R, Jonard N. Heterogenous agents, interactions and economic performance, lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, Berlin:Springer, 2002,521:155-174.
[22] 张兵,王文平.非正式知识网络关系强度分布与知识流动的小世界[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(4):159-166.
[23] Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. Amer. J. Sociol, 1973, 78(6): 1360-1380.
[24] Burt R,Nohria R, Eccles, et al. Networks and organizations: structure, form and action. Boston:Harvard Business School Press, 1992.57-91.
[25] Schilling M A,Phelps C C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management Sci, 2007, 53(7): 1113-1126.
[26] Leavitte H. Some effects of communication patterns on group performance [J]. Abnormal Soc. Psych., 1951, 46(1): 38-50.
[27] Nerkar S, Paruchuri A. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm [J]. Management Sci, 2005, 51(5): 711-785.
[28] Lovejoy W S, Sinha A. Efficient structures for innovative social networks[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(7): 1127-1145.
[29] Valente T. Network models of the diffusion of innovations [M]. Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press, 1995.
[30] Watts D. Small Words[M]. Princedton:Princeton University Press, NJ, 1999.
[31] Coleman J. Foundations of social theory[M].Cambridge, MA:Belknap Press, 1990.
[32] Burt R. Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005.
[33] Cowan R, Jonard N. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics &Control,2004, 28: 1557-1575.
[34] 陈子凤,官建成.合作网络的小世界性对创新网络的影响[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):115-120.
[35] Utterback J M. Mastering the dynamics of innovation[M]. Boston MA:Harvard Business School Press, 1994.
[36] Gort M, Klepper S. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations[J]. The Economic Journal,1982(92):630-653.
[37] Klepper S, Graddy E. The evolution of new industries and the determinants of market structure[J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1990, 21(1): 27-44.
[38] 姚建华,金莉銮.产业生命周期理论的发展评述[J].广东农工商职业技术学院学报,2009,25(2):56-58.
[39] Eaton C, Eswaran M. Technology trading coalitions in supergames [J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1997,28:135-149.
[40] Watts D, Strogatz S. Collective dynamics of small-world networks [J]. Nature,1998,393:440-442.
[41] Watts D. Dynamics and the small-world phenomenon[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1999, 105(2):493-527.
[42] Northwestern University.Wilensky U.Netlogo[CP/OL].http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo,1999-2013.
[43] 王文平.南京市科技创新平台与载体建设模式研究[R].南京市软科学研究项目,2010.
[44] 郑吉昌,夏晴.服务业企业国际化经营的动因与进入模式的选择[J].社会科学家,2004,(4):77-81.
[45] 赵建瑜,王文平.基于知识特征的不同产业转移模式及知识转移模式研究[J].内蒙古社会科学,2008.29(1):101-106.

Optimistic Structures of Collective Innovation Networks in Different Stages ofIndustry Life Circle

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Yinyun Yu,Congdong Li,Yelin Fu,Kinkeung Lai. A Cross-efficiency Evaluation Method Considering Decision Maker Preference Structure [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 117-126.
[2]	Xingguang Chen,Xinyu Li,Luqiang Cheng. Research on Optimization Strategy of Food Delivery Crowdsourcing Delivery Considering Order Preference [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(6): 86-97.
[3]	Zhongqun Wu,Ruijin Zheng. The Generators Bidding Model Introducing Financial Transmission Rights under the USP Electricity Price Mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(3): 48-59.
[4]	Jiliang Sheng,Yi Huang,Juchao Li. Research on the Correlation Between Industry Risk and Industry Network Structure in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 199-209.
[5]	Lisheng Jiang,Huchang Liao. Risk-efficiency Mixed Consensus Model Considering Consensus Efficiency and Misjudgment Risk [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 23-30.
[6]	Chongyi Jing,Hanyimeng Guo,Yan Lu,Mengyao Wu. Dynamic Game of Airline Network Selection under Uncertain Conditions [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 133-145.
[7]	Shuai LU,Shou-wei LI,Jian-min HE. Multistage Efficiency Considering Network Status of Funds and its Predictive Ability [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 22-34.
[8]	KANG Wen-jin, ZHANG Kang. A Study on the Relationship between Liquidity Shock and Stock Return in Chinese A-Share Market [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 68-77.
[9]	QIAO Jian, CHEN Meng-tian, HE Meng-ying, CHEN Xin-jun. A Multi-intersection Coordinated Control with Equal Emphasis on Efficiency, Fairness, and Spillback [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 214-226.
[10]	FAN Hong, CHEN Nai-xi. Multi-stage Risk Contagion Mechanism and Empirical Study Based on Spillover Effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(6): 39-48.
[11]	LI Bing-qing, ZHANG Xiao-yuan. Study on the Internal Risk Contagion Mechanism of Enterprise Groups Based on Network Structure [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(5): 20-28.
[12]	CHEN Guo-quan, WANG Jing-yi, LIN Yan-ling, LIU Wei, ZHOU Qi-wei, XU Fen. A Study on the Model of Multi-individual Learning from Experience: From the Perspective of Matching between Information and Analytic Method [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(3): 259-267.
[13]	YANG Huan, LV Cheng-chao. Ten Years of “New Medical Reform”: The Regional Differences, Dynamic Evolution and Influencing Factors of China’s Medical and Health Service Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 162-172.
[14]	Jian-jun PAN,Guang-ming HOU,Ji-fa GU,Hua-feng ZHANG,Jun-peng WANG,Ze-wei CHEN. Empirical Study on the Impact of Technological Progress on the Environmental Efficiency of China's Power Industry: Based on SBM Super Efficiency-ML-Tobit [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 215-227.
[15]	Yan HUANG,Li-ye CHEN,Nan WU,Ying-ming WANG,Yong-wu DAI. Study on Interval Benchmarking Based on Efficiency Compensation Mechanism——Taking Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency as An Example [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 317-328.