网络舆情扰动下房地产投资者“追涨杀跌”行为扩散研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1071

Abstract

Abstract: Under the guidance of Internet public opinion, it is likely to intensify the speculative psychology of real estate investors, and then evolve into behavior of “buying the winners” and intensify its diffusion. Once the behavior of “buying the winners” occurs in a large scale, it will lead to serious value deviation of the real estate market or even turbulence, which is not conducive to the stable development of national economy and the improvement of people’s living standards. However, the current research rarely considers the interaction of Internet users, media and government, which leads to the conclusion that the behavior of “buying the winners” is not representative enough. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the synergistic effect of these three main bodies, and then to study the diffusion mechanism and evolution characteristics of the behavior of “buying the winners” under the disturbance of network public opinion.

Key words: internet public opinion; investor behavior preference; “buying the winners”; complex network

CLC Number:

F832

WANG Lei, , LI Shou-wei, HE Jian-min, HOU De-fei. The Behavior Spread of “Buying the Winners” of Real Estate Investors under the Disturbance of Internet Public Opinion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 56-69.

References

［1］刘刚, 扈文秀, 章伟果,等. 随机交易行为、羊群行为与资产价格波动研究［J］. 管理科学, 2016(2):122-133.Liu Gang, Hu Wenxiu, Zhang Weiguo, et al. Study on random trading behavior, herd behavior and asset price volatility［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2016(2):122-133.
［2］胡昌生, 陶铸. 个体投资者情绪、网络自媒体效应与股票收益［J］. 预测, 2017(3):50-55.Hu Changsheng, Tao Zhu. Individual investor sentiment, network we-media effect and stock returns［J］. Frontiers of Science and Technology of Engineering Management, 2017(3):50-55.
［3］田高良, 司毅, 秦岭, 等. 网络舆情及其应对与上市公司的信息效率［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(1):46-66.Tian Gaoliang, Si Yi, Qin Ling, et al. Internet public opinions, response and listed firms’ information efficiency［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(1):46-66.
［4］刘圣尧, 李怡宗, 杨云红. 中国股市的崩盘系统性风险与投资者行为偏好［J］. 金融研究, 2016(2):55-70.Liu Shengyao, Li Yizong, Yang Yunhong. The systematic crash risk and investor preference in Chinese stock market［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2016(2):55-70.
［5］岑咏华, 张灿, 吴承尧, 等. 互联网加剧投资者有限理性研究综述［J］. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 472(6):130-141.Cen Yonghua, Zhang Can, Wu Chengyao, et al. How does Internet escalate investor bounded rationality? A literature review［J］. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 472(6):130-141.
［6］陈文博, 陈浪南, 王升泉. 投资者的博彩行为研究——基于盈亏状态和投资者情绪的视角［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2):22-33.Chen Wenbo, Chen langnan, Wang Shengquan. Investors’ gambling behavior-perspective from profit/loss condition and investor sentiment［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(2):22-33.
［7］ Liu Shuming. Investor sentiment and stock market liquidity［J］. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2015, 16(1):51-67.
［8］刘晓星, 张旭, 顾笑贤, 等. 投资者行为如何影响股票市场流动性?——基于投资者情绪、信息认知和卖空约束的分析［J］. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(10):87-100.Liu Xiaoxing, Zhang Xu, Gu Xiaoxian, et al. How does investor behavior affect stock market liquidity? Analysis of investor sentiment, information cognition and short-sale constraints［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(10):87-100.
［9］贺志芳, 文凤华, 黄创霞, 等. 投资者情绪与时变风险补偿系数［J］. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(12):29-38.He Zhifang, Wen Fenghua, Huang Chuangxia, et al. Investor sentiment and time-varying coefficient of risk compensation［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2017, 20(12):29-38.
［10］姚尧之, 王坚强, 刘志峰. 混频投资者情绪与股票价格行为［J］. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(2):104-113.Yao Yaozhi, Wang jiangqiang, Liu Zhifeng. Mixed-frequency investor sentiment and stock price behavior［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(2):104-113.
［11］石善冲, 朱颖楠, 赵志刚, 等. 基于微信文本挖掘的投资者情绪与股票市场表现［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(6):1404-1412.Shi shanchong, Zhu Yingnan, Zhao Zhigang, et al. The investor sentiment mined from WeChat text and stock market performance［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(6):1404-1412.
［12］赵汝为,熊熊,沈德华.投资者情绪与股价崩盘风险: 来自中国市场的经验证据［J］. 管理评论, 2019,31(3):50-60.Zhao Ruwei, Xiong Xiong, Shen Dehua. Investor sentiment and stock price crash risk: evidence from China［J］. Management Review, 2019,31(3):50-60.
［13］肖欣荣, 刘健. 基于网络理论的金融传染与投资者行为研究进展［J］. 经济学动态, 2015(5):139-146.Xiao Xinrong, Liu Jian. Progress on financial contagion and investor behavior based on network theory［J］. Economic Perspectives, 2015(5):139-146.
［14］ Chen Tingqiang, He Jianmin, Li Xindan. An evolving network model of credit risk contagion in the financial market［J］. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2017, 23(1):22-37.
［15］ Linciano N, Lucarelli C, Gentile M, et al. How financial information disclosure affects risk perception. Evidence from Italian investors’ behaviour［J］. European Journal of Finance, 2018(3):1-22.
［16］ Wang Lei, Li Shouwei, Chen Tingqiang. Investor behavior, information disclosure strategy and counterparty credit risk contagion［J］. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2019, 119:37-49.
［17］ Polkovnichenko V, Wei K, Zhao Feng. Cautious risk takers: investor preferences and demand for active management［J］. The Journal of Finance, 2019, 74(2):1025-1075.
［18］ Opie W, Zhang Hongfeng. Investor heterogeneity and the cross-sectional stock returns in China［J］. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2013, 25（11）:1-20.
［19］金永红, 罗丹. 异质信念、投资者情绪与资产定价研究综述［J］. 外国经济与管理, 2017(5):100-114.Jin Yonghong, Luo Dan. A literature review of heterogeneous belief, investor sentiment and asset pricing［J］. Foreign Economics & Management, 2017(5):100-114.
［20］孟庆斌, 黄清华. 卖空机制是否降低了股价高估?——基于投资者异质信念的视角［J］. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(4):48-71.Meng Qingbin, Huang Qinghua. Does short selling decrease stock overvaluation: a perspective of heterogeneous beliefs［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(4):48-71.
［21］ Allen M T, Rutherford J, Rutherford R, et al. Impact of investors in distressed housing markets［J］. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2018, 56(4):622-652.
［22］肖斌卿, 王粟旸, 周小超, 等. 债务网络,投资者行为与传染性风险:来自中国银行业与房地产业的研究发现［J］. 管理科学学报, 2014, 17(11):139-150.Xiao binqing, Wang Sumin, Zhou Xiaochao, et al. Debt network, investor behavior and infectious risk: research findings from China’s banking and real estate industries［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2014, 17(11):139-150.
［23］张浩. 异质性预期、投资者行为与房价波动: 上海和广州的双城记［J］. 财经研究, 2016(8):51-61.Zhang Hao. Heterogeneous expectations,investor behavior and fluctuations in housing prices: tale of two cities between shanghai［J］. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2016(8):51-61.
［24］ Zanetti F. Housing and relative risk aversion［J］. Economics letters, 2014, 123(1):23-25.
［25］张光利, 刘小元. 住房价格与居民风险偏好［J］. 经济研究, 2018, 53(1):110-123.Zhang Guangli, Liu Xiaoyuan. Housing price and residents’ risk preference［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53(1):110-123.
［26］高波, 王文莉, 李祥. 预期、收入差距与中国城市房价租金“剪刀差”之谜［J］. 经济研究, 2013, 48(6):100-112,126.Gao Bo, Wang Wenli, Li Xiang. Expectation, income inequality and the puzzle of city’s housing price to rent scissors in China［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2013, 48(6):100-112,126.
［27］王永钦, 包特. 异质交易者、房地产泡沫与房地产政策［J］. 世界经济, 2011(11):86-104.Wang Yongqin, Bao Te. Heterogeneous traders, real estate foam and real estate policy［J］. The Journal of World Economy, 2011(11):86-104.
［28］张维, 沈德华, 熊熊, 等. 媒体偏见与资产价格［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(11):2749-2754.Zhang Wei, Shen Dehua, Xiong Xiong, et al. Media bias and asset pricing［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2015, 35(11):2749-2754.
［29］吴鹏, 强韶华, 高庆宁. 基于SOAR模型的网民群体负面情感建模研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3):126-138.Wu Peng, Qiang Shaohua, Gao Qingning. Modelling internet users’ negative emotion based on soar model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3):126-138.
［30］林燕霞, 谢湘生, 张德鹏. 复杂交互行为影响下的网络舆情演化分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1):212-221.Lin Yanxia, Xie Xiangsheng, Zhang Depeng. Analysis of online public opinion evolution under the influence of complex interactions behaviors［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1):212-221.
［31］李诗悦, 李晚莲. 公共危机网络舆情演变机理: 路径及动因——以动物疫情危机为例［J］. 中国行政管理, 2019(2):116-121.Li Shiyue, Li Wanlian. Evolution mechanism of public crisis network public opinion: path and motivation —— Taking animal epidemic crisis as an example［J］. Chinese Public Administration, 2019(2):116-121.
［32］李永奎, 周宗放. 基于无标度网络的关联信用风险传染延迟效应［J］. 系统工程学报, 2015, 30(5):575-583.Li Yongkui, Zhou Zongfang. contagion delay end effects of associated credit risk based on scale-free network［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2015, 30(5):575-583.
［33］钱茜, 周宗放, 李永奎. 管控策略对关联企业网络稳定状态的影响——基于关联信用风险传染的视角［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6):21-29.Qian Qian, Zhou Zongfang, Li Yongkui. The influence of control strategy on the stability of affiliated enterprises network——based on the Perspective of associated credit contagion［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(6):21-29.
［34］高宾, 王兰成. 网络衍生舆情的传播模型及分析方法研究［J］. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(3):169-174.Gao Bin, Wang Lancheng. Propagation model and analysis method of network-derived public opinion［J］. Information Studies:Theory & Application, 2019, 42(3):169-174.
［35］ Gilpin M E, Ayala F J. Global models of growth and competition［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1973, 70(12):3590-3593.
［36］ Chen Chiawei, Pantzalis C, Park J C. Press coverage and stock price deviation from fundamental value［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2013, 36(2):175-214.
［37］ Li Huaye, Sakamoto Y. Social impacts in social media: an examination of perceived truthfulness and sharing of information［J］. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 41(12):278-287.
［38］陈庭强, 何建敏. 基于复杂网络的信用风险传染模型研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11):1-10.Chen Tingqiang, he Jianmin. Credit risk contagion model based on complex network［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(11):1-10.
［39］ King G, Pan J, Roberts M E. How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument［J］. American Political Science Review, 2017, 111(3):484-501.
［40］ Anderson J R. Cognitive psychology and its implications［M］. Macmillan: Worth Publishers, 2005.
［41］ Lachman R, Lachman J L, Butterfield E C. Cognitive psychology and information processing: an introduction［M］. New York: Psychology Press, 2015.
［42］李梦雨, 李志辉. 市场操纵与股价崩盘风险——基于投资者情绪的路径分析［J］. 国际金融研究, 2019, 384(4):87-94.Li Mengyu, Li Zhihui. Market manipulation and the risk of stock price collapse——a path analysis based on investor sentiment［J］. Studies of International Finance, 2019, 384(4):87-94.
［43］ Barabási A L, Albert R, Jeong H, et al. Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, 2000, 272(1-2):173-187.
［44］ Vikram S V, Sinha S. Emergence of universal scaling in financial markets from mean-field dynamics［J］. Physical Review E: Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics, 2011, 83(2):016101.
［45］ Boguá M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. Absence of epidemic threshold in scale-free networks with degree correlations［J］. Physical Review Letters, 2003, 90(2):028701.
［46］ Barabási A L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks［J］. Science, 1999, 286(5439):509-512.
［47］ Erds P, Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs［J］. Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1960, 5(1):17-60.

[1]	Kun Zhou,Xiaohui Gao,Lianshui Li. Integrated Carbon Emission Trading Price Prediction Based on EMD-XGB-ELM and FSGM from the Perspective of Dual Processing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 325-334.
[2]	Zhiqiang Ye,Shunming Zhang,Xuechen Shen,Jiefei Zheng. Volatility Timing Effect of Private Placement for Chinese Listed Firms [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 30-40.
[3]	Feng He,Hanyu Du,Jing Hao. Is There an Internet Media Coverage Premium in the Chinese Stock Market? [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 20-29.
[4]	Xiaojun Shi,Jiakun Xing. Credit-insurance Covered Financing of the Retailer-dominated Supply Chain: A Newsvendor Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 194-203.
[5]	Changqing Luo,Lan Liu,Huiming Zhu,Min Zhang. An Empirical Study on the Dynamic Evolution of Crude Oil Market Pricing Power Based on Multi-scale Information Share Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(6): 1-12.
[6]	Han He,Sicheng Li. Research on the Modeling of Default Risk Contagion of Guarantee Circle Based on Directed Complex Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(6): 22-33.
[7]	Xinnan Lei,Lefan Lin,Binqing Xiao,Honghai Yu. Re-exploration of Small and Micro Enterprises' Default Characteristics Based on Machine Learning Models with SHAP [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 1-12.
[8]	Linli Xie,Aifan Ling. Equity Extreme Tail Risks,Leverage Ratio and Credit Spreads of the Corporate Bonds in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 47-60.
[9]	Lanbiao Liu,Liang Guo. Downside Risk in the Chinese A-Share Market: Based on the Perspective of Generalized Disappointment Aversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 61-72.
[10]	Meifeng Zou,Xindong Zhang,Weiqi Liu. Supplier Concentration and its Financialization: “Risk Effect” or “Synergic Effect” [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(3): 116-124.
[11]	Qiang Fu,Zelong Shi. Research on Frequency of the Joint Network Connectedness of Systemic Financial Risks in China ——Based on the Locally Stationary Non-parametric Time-varying Vector HAR Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 1-10.
[12]	Jun Hu,Qiang Li,Jiacheng Dai,Yong Zeng. Textual Analysis-based Measurement of Fintech and tests of Enabling Effect for Commercial Banks [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(1): 31-41.
[13]	Yikang Qi. Nonfinancial Corporate Debt and Resource Allocation Optimization——A Quantitative Analysis Based on the Dynamic General Equilibrium Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(1): 65-74.
[14]	De-hua SHEN,Yue LI. Do Commodity Futures Improve the Performances of Traditional Portfolios? Evidence from the Chinese Market [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 34-45.
[15]	Yong-ji ZHANG,Tian-xiong LI,Zhi SU,Qiong HUANG. Fund Size, Investor Attention and Fund Performance Persistence [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 57-68.

The Behavior Spread of “Buying the Winners” of Real Estate Investors under the Disturbance of Internet Public Opinion

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0