Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 174-184.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1072
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Yi-xiang1, YU Sha2, PU Yong-jian2
Received:
2020-06-05
Revised:
2020-09-15
Online:
2023-06-20
Published:
2023-06-17
Contact:
黄毅祥
E-mail:963639400@qq.com
CLC Number:
HUANG Yi-xiang, YU Sha, PU Yong-jian. Electricity Price Reform and Manager Behavior of Generation Companies: Based on Multi-objective Principal-agent Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(6): 174-184.
[1] Joskow P, Tirole J. Retail electricity competition [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(4): 799-815. [2] Joskow P, Tirole J. Reliability, and competitive electricity markets [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2007, 38(1): 60-84. [3] Ndebele T, Marsh D, Scarpa R. Consumer switching in retail electricity markets: is price all that matters? [J]. Energy Economics, 2019, 83(6):88-103. [4] Szoke T, Hortay O, Balogh E. Asymmetric price transmission in the Hungarian retail electricity market[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 133(10):1-9. [5] Loi T S A, Jindal G. Electricity market deregulation in singapore-initial assessment of wholesale prices[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 127(4):1-10. [6] Duso T, Szücs F. Market power and heterogeneous pass-through in German electricity retail[J]. European Economic Review, 2017, 98(7):354-372. [7] 孙坚强, 崔小梅, 蔡玉梅. PPI和CPI的非线性传导:产业链与价格预期机制[J]. 经济研究, 2016(51):54-68.Sun Jianqiang, Cui Xiaomei, Cai Yumei. Nonlinear transmission between CPI and PPI: production chain and price expectation mechanisms[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016(51):54-68. [8] 黄毅祥,蒲勇健.售电侧改革、市场主体变化与电价红利:基于讨价还价博弈[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(3):74-82.Huang Yixiang, Pu Yongjian. Research on the benefit distribution of the electricity retail market after competition being introduced based on bargaining game[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2020, 34(3):74-82. [9] Armstrong M, Sappington D E M. Regulation, competition, and liberalization[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2006, 44(2):325-366. [10] Mulder M, Willems B. The dutch retail electricity market[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 127:228-239. [11] 迈克尔·G.波利特,杨宗翰,陈浩.电力改革:国际经验与中国选择[J].财经智库,2017,2(4):5-83+140.Pollitt M G, Yang Zonghan, Chen Hao. Reforming the Chinese electricity supply sector: lessons from international experience[J]. Working Papers, 2017,2(4):5-83+140. [12] Puller S L, West J. Efficient retail pricing in electricity and natural gas markets [J]. American Economic Review, 2013, 103(3):350-355. [13] 刘敦楠,孟雅儒.考虑非价格因素的售电公司竞争力分析[J].电力系统自动化,2017,41(23):53-60.Liu Dunnan, Meng Yaru. Analysis on competitiveness of electricity retailers considering non-price factor[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017,41(23):53-60. [14] Matsukawa I. Detecting collusion in retail electricity markets: results from Japan for 2005 to 2010[J]. Utilities Policy, 2019, 57(4):16-23. [15] 蒲勇健,余沙,黄毅祥.中国电力市场长期产业组织架构与电价趋势研究[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(1):158-167.Pu Yongjian, Yu Sha, Huang Yixiang. Long-term industrial structure and electricity price trend in China’s power market[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 158-167. [16] 黄毅祥.售电侧放开后电力市场垄断与竞争的寡头博弈研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(5):142-151.Huang Yixiang. Research on the alliance pricing of the electricity retail market after competition being introduced based on coalitional game[J]. Journal of Southwest University Natural Science Edition, 2021,43(5):142-151. [17] 余祥瑀,黄守军,杨俊.多寡头电力市场中考虑水平合作的碳减排竞争微分对策模型[J].中国管理科学,2020,28(5):189-199.Yu Xiangyu, Huang Shoujun, Yang Jun. Differential game models for carbon emission reduction competition considering horizontal cooperation in oligopoly electricity market[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(5): 189-199. [18] 李炳堃. 国资改革与混合所有制——基于委托代理理论视角[J]. 经济问题, 2017(12):60-64.Li Bingkun. State-owned assets reform and mixed ownership: based on the perspective of principal-agent theory[J]. On Economic Problems, 2017(12):60-64. [19] 郭汉丁, 郝海, 张印贤. 工程质量政府监督代理链分析与多层次激励机制探究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6):82-90.Guo Handing, Hao Hai, Zhang Yinxian. Analysis on agency chain and research on multi-level incentive mechanism of project quality government supervision[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(6): 82-90. [20] 张斌, 李宏兵, 陈岩. 所有制混合能促进企业创新吗?——基于委托代理冲突与股东间冲突的整合视角[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(4):42-57.Zhang Bin, Li Hongbin, Chen Yan. Can mixed ownership improve firm innovation? ——An integrated perspective of principal-agent conflicts and principal-principal conflicts[J]. Management Review, 2019, 31(4):42-57. [21] 朱恒鹏,岳阳,林振翮.统筹层次提高如何影响社保基金收支——委托—代理视角下的经验证据[J].经济研究,2020,55(11):101-120.Zhu Hengpeng, Yue Yang, Lin Zhenhe. Effects of centralizing fund management on Chinese public pension and health insurance programs[J]. Economic Research Journal,2020,55(11):101-120. [22] 许保光,徐静,高敏刚,邵雪焱.具有风险传导特征的信息加工业务薪酬激励研究[J].中国管理科学,2019,27(10):128-137.Xu Baoguang, Xu Jing, Gao Mingang, Shao Xueyan. Research on salary incentive mechanism for information processing business with risk conduction[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(10): 128-137. [23] 蒋海, 朱滔, 李东辉. 监管、多重代理与商业银行治理的最优激励契约设计[J]. 经济研究, 2010(4):41-54.Jiang Hai, Zhu Tao, Li Donghui. Regulation, multitask-principal-agent and optimal incentive contract design on commercial bank governance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010(4):41-54. [24] 陈勇强, 傅永程, 华冬冬. 基于多任务委托代理的业主与承包商激励模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(4):45-55.Chen Yongqiang, Fu Yongcheng, Hua Dongdong. A multi-task incentive model between the owner and contractor[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(4):45-55. [25] 毕睿罡,王钦云.政企合谋视角下的环境治理——基于官员考核标准变化的准自然实验[J].当代经济科学,2019,41(4):62-75.Bi Ruigang, Wang Qinyun. Environmental governance from the perspective of government-enterprise collusion: a quasi-nature experiment based on the change in official assessment system[J]. Modern Economic Science,2019,41(4):62-75. [26] Hosseinian S M, Carmichael D G. Optimal incentive contract with risk-neutral contractor[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2013, 139(8):899-909. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
|