PPP项目政府成员自我面子顾虑和承诺升级：学位的调节作用

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0707

Abstract

Abstract:

As a label of personal ability， academic degree is the influencing factors of social status. In PPP （Public-Private Partnership） project， in order to maintain the status and image， the government member’s decision-making behavior is often affected by self-face concerns. Highly educated government officials will be more inclined to self-face concerns， and aggravate the risk of escalation of commitment. As the initiator of PPP project， government member's escalation of commitment has a serious influence on project performance. Accordingly， based on the perspective of the current situation of the average education improvement and the strategy of government PPP talent reserve， the differences of the influence of self-face concerns of government members on escalation of commitment under the different academic degree in PPP projects are mainly discussed. In the study， a situational questionnaire survey is conducted with government departments of different educational levels as subjects， and 155 valid are were collected. Through data processing and multi-group analysis （measurement model， average structure， path structure） with SPSS and AMOS， it is found that： The tendency of government's self-face concern increases with the rise of education level； Compared with master's degree and bachelor's degree， the self-face concern of the government with doctoral degree have a more significant impact on the escalation of commitment； In PPP projects， the government's escalation of commitment also has a upward trend with the increase of education level. The results provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the government's human resource structure and the management of decision-maker’s escalation of commitment in PPP project.

Key words: academic degree, government members, self-face concern, escalation of commitment, PPP project

CLC Number:

C936

Jia-qi LIU, Ji-cai LIU. Government Member's Self-face Concern and Escalation of Commitment in PPP Project: Regulation of Academic Degree[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 233-243.

Figures/Tables 10

References 56

1	叶晓甦，徐春梅. 我国公共项目公私合作（PPP）模式研究述评［J］. 软科学， 2013， 27（6）： 6-9.
	Ye Xiaosu， Xu Chunmei. Review and research on PPP pattern in China［J］. Soft Science， 2013， 27（6）： 6-9.
2	李林，刘志华，章昆昌. 参与方地位非对称条件下PPP项目风险分配的博弈模型［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2013， 33（8）： 1940-1948.
	Li Lin， Liu Zhihua， Zhang Kunchang. Game model for PPP project's risk allocation under the asymmetry condition of participant's position［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice， 2013， 33（8）： 1940-1948.
3	王东. PPP主体关系中的政府：角色定位与行为机制框架［J］. 中国政府采购， 2015（3）： 74-79.
	Wang Dong. Government in PPP subject relationship： role orientation and behavior mechanism framework［J］. China Government Procurement， 2015（3）： 74-79.
4	Ho D Y F. On the concept of face［J］. American Journal of Sociology， 1976， 81（4）： 867-884.
5	陈衍，杨超楠，王欣. 承诺升级现象及影响因素探讨［J］. 科技信息， 2012（7）： 366-366.
	Chen Yan， Yang Chaonan， Wang Xin. Discussion On the phenomenon of escalation of commitment and influencing factors［J］. Science & Technology Information， 2012（7）： 366-366.
6	Drummond H. Escalation of commitment： when to stay the course？［J］. Academy of Management Perspectives， 2014， 28（4）： 430-446.
7	刘继才，刘珈琪，周亦宁. 面子顾虑对PPP项目利益相关者承诺升级影响研究—基于政府和社会资本主体［J］. 管理工程学报， 2019， 33（4）： 167-175.
	Liu Jicai， Liu Jiaqi， Zhou Yining. Impact of face concerns on stakeholder’s escalation of commitment in PPP project： base on the government and private sector［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management， 2019， 33（4）： 167-175.
8	孙丽君，徐建蓉. 决策者人格特征对承诺升级的影响研究［J］. 商业研究， 2006， 23： 47-51.
	Sun Lijun， Xu Jianrong. The effects of decision maker’s personality traits on commitment escalation［J］. Commercial Research， 2006， 23： 47-51.
9	Nguyen A， Mollik A， Chih Y Y. Managing critical risks affecting the financial viability of public-private partnership projects： case study of toll road projects in Vietnam［J］. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management， 2018， 144（12）： 05018014.
10	Wang Ling， Zhou Lihong， Xiong Yan， et al. Effect of promotion pressure and financial burden on investment in public-private partnership infrastructure projects in China［J］. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature， 2019， 33（2）： 128-142.
11	王秀芹，刘旸，王兵. PPP项目再融资收益分配研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2021， DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2194 .
	Wang Xiuqin， Liu Yang， Wang Bing. Research on income distribution of PPP project refinancing［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2194 .
12	Domingues S， Sarmento J M. Critical renegotiation triggers of European transport concessions［J］. Transport Policy， 2016， 48（5）： 82-91.
13	宋金波，宋丹荣，富怡雯，等. 基于风险分担的基础设施BOT项目特许期调整模型［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2012， 32（6）： 1270-1277.
	Song Jinbo， Song Danrong， Fu Yiwen， et al. Concession period adjustment model for infrastructure BOT projects based on risk allocation［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice， 2012， 32（6）： 1270-1277.
14	梁秀峰，张飞涟，颜红艳. 基于演化博弈的PPP项目绩效支付机制仿真与优化［J］. 中国管理科学， 2021， 28（4）： 153-163.
	Liang Xiufeng， Zhang feilian， Yan Hongyan. Simulation and optimization of PPP project performance payment mechanism based on evolutionary Game［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， 28（4）： 153-163.
15	Huemann M， Silvius G. Projects to create the future： managing projects meets sustainable development［J］. International Journal of Project Management， 2017， 35（6）： 1066-1070.
16	袁竞峰，陈振东，张磊，等. 基于效用最大化的PPP项目社会资本社会风险决策行为研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2019， 39（1）： 102-112.
	Yuan Jingfeng， Chen Zhendong， Zhang Lei， et al. Social risk decision-making behavior of private sectors based on utility maximization in PPP project［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice， 2019， 39（1）： 102-112.
17	周春梅，覃贵鹏，柴伟. 特色小镇PPP项目主体行为风险研究［J］. 项目管理技术， 2020， 18（5）： 30-34.
	Zhou Chunmei， Qin Guipeng， Cai Wei. Subjective behavior risks of PPP project in characteristic town［J］. Project Management Technology， 2020， 18（5）： 30-34.
18	王守清，张博，程嘉旭，等. 政府行为对PPP项目绩效的影响研究［J］. 软科学， 2020， 34（3）： 1-5.
	Wang Shouqing， Zhang Bo， Cheng Jiaxu， et al. Study on the influence of government behavior on PPP performance［J］. Soft Science， 2020， 34（3）： 1-5.
19	Staw B M. Knee-Deep in the Big Muddy： A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action［J］. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance， 2010， 16（1）： 27-44.
20	Staw B M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action［J］. The Academy of Management Review， 1981， 6（4）： 577-587.
21	Juliusson A. Optimism as modifier of escalation of commitment［J］. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology， 2006， 47： 345-348.
22	Singer M S. Singer A E. Individual differences and the escalation of commitment paradigm［J］. The Journal of Social Psychology， 2001， 126（2）： 197-204.
23	Moon H， Hollenbeck J R， Humphrey S E， et al. The tripartite model of neuroticism and the suppression of depression and anxiety within an escalation of commitment dilemma［J］. Journal of Personality， 2003， 71（3）： 347-368.
24	Gomez C， Sanehez J I. Cultural boundaries of self-justification and prospect theories in escalation of commitment： a US-Mexico comparison. The international Journal of Human Resource Management， 2013， 24（13）： 2646-2656.
25	Keil M， Tan B C Y， Wei K K， et al. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects［J］. MIS Quarterly， 2000， 24（2）： 299-325.
26	Salter S B， Sharp D J， Chen Y. The moderating effects of national culture on escalation of commitment［J］. Advances in Accounting， 2013， 29（1）： 161-169.
27	Chow C W， Harrison P， Lindquist T， et al. Escalating commitment to unprofitable projects： replication and cross-cultural extension［J］. Management Accounting Research， 1997（8）： 347-361.
28	Tse D K， Lee K， Vertinsky I， et al. Does culture matter？ A cross-cultural study of executives' choice， decisiveness， and risk adjustment in international marketing［J］. Journal of Marketing， 1988， 52（4）： 81-95.
29	王轶楠，杨中芳. 中西方面子研究综述［J］. 心理科学， 2005， 28（2）： 398-401.
	Wang Yinan， Yang Zhongfang. A literature review of face［J］. Psychological Science， 2005， 28（2）： 398-401.
30	Goffman E. Interaction ritual： essays on Face to Fade Behavior［M］. Garden City. New York， 1967.
31	石田浩，胡健. 学历与社会经济地位的关系—日、美、英间的比较研究［J］. 国外社会科学， 1990， 7： 50-51.
	Shi Tianhao， Hu Jian. The relationship between educational background and socio-economic status-a comparative study between Japan， the US and Britain［J］. Social Sciences Abroad， 1990（7）： 50-51.
32	王萍，张茜. 面子对家族企业员工建言行为的影响：以上下级关系为中介［J］. 人类工效学， 2016， 22（4）： 18-22.
	Wang Ping， Zhang Qian. Effect of mianzi to family enterprise employee voice behavior： SSG as intermediary［J］. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics， 2016， 22（4）： 18-22.
33	Braxton C C， Robinson C N， Awad S S. Escalation of commitment in the surgical ICU［J］. Critical Care Medicine， 2017， 45（4）： e433.
34	刘根. 大学生品牌消费倾向的实证研究［J］. 重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）， 2014， 14（4）： 54-58.
	Liu Gen. An empirical research of college students' brand consumption tendency［J］. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University （Social Sciences Edition）， 2014， 14（4）： 54-58.
35	汤二子. 学历和性别对劳动者工资的影响研究［J］. 统计研究， 2012， 29（11）： 67-73.
	Tang Erzi. The impact of education degree and gender difference on the worker wages［J］. Statistical Research， 2012， 29（11）： 67-73.
36	Goffman E. Interaction ritual： essays on face to fade behavior［M］. Garden City. New York， 1967.
37	金耀基. “面”、“耻 ”与中国人行为之分析［J］.中国社会心理学评论， 2006（1）： 48-64.
	Jin Yaoji. Analysis of “face”， “shame” and Chinese behavior［J］. Chinese Social Psychological Review， 2006（1）： 48-64.
38	Ting-Toomey S， Kurogi A. Facework competence in intercultural conflict： an updated face-negotiation theory［J］. International Journal of Intercultural Relations， 1998， 22（2）： 187-225.
39	Hwang K K. Moral face and social face： contingent self-esteem in confucian society［J］. International Journal of Psychology， 2006， 41（4）： 276-281.
40	Hwang K K. Face and morality in confucian Society［M］. Foundations of Chinese Psychology. Springer New York， 2012.
41	Rogan R G， Mitchell R. Hammer. Crisis negotiations： a preliminary investigation of facework in naturalistic conflict discourse［J］. Journal of Applied Communication Research， 1994， 22（3）： 216-231.
42	Ting-Toomey S， Kurogi A. Facework competence in intercultural conflict： an updated face-negotiation theory［J］. International Journal of Intercultural Relations， 1998， 22（2）： 187-225.
43	Ting-Toomey S. The matrix of face： an updated face-negotiation theory［M］// Gudykunst W B. Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. London， England： Sage Publications Ltd， 2005： 71-92.
44	Fletcher C V， Nakazawa M， Chen Yeawen， et al. Establishing cross-cultural measurement equivalence of scales associated with face-negotiation theory： acritical issue in cross-cultural comparisons［J］. Journal of International & Intercultural Communication， 2014， 7（2）： 148-169.
45	Abidin N Z， Yusof N， Othman A A E. Enablers and challenges of a sustainable housing industry in Malaysia［J］. Construction Innovation， 2013， 13（1）： 10-25.
46	Comrey A L. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology［J］. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology， 1988， 56（5）： 754-761.
47	Oetzel J， Garcia A J， Ting-Toomey S. An analysis of the relationships among face concerns and facework behaviors in perceived conflict situations［J］. International Journal of Conflict Management， 2008， 19（4）： 382-403.
48	Anderson J C， Gerbing D W. Structural equation modeling in practice： a review and recommended two-step approach［J］. Psychological Bulletin， 1988， 103（3）： 411-423.
49	Liu Jiaqi， Liu Jicai， Liu Nana. Government’s control rights influence investor’s escalation of commitment in PPP project： regulating effect of other-face concern［J］. Physica A： Statistical Mechanics and its Applications， 2020， 454： 123617.
50	Salter S B， Sharp D J. Agency effects and escalation of commitment： do small national culture differences matter？［J］. International Journal of Accounting， 2001， 36（1）： 33-45.
51	Greene K， Krcmar M. Predicting exposure to and liking of media violence： a uses and gratifications approach［J］. Communication Studies， 2005， 56（1）： 71-93.
52	Fornell C， Larcker D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error［J］. Journal of Marketing Research， 1981， 18（1）： 39-50.
53	Steinmetz H， Schmidt P， Tinabooh A， et al. Testing measurement invariance using Multi-group CFA： differences between educational groups in human values measurement［J］. Quality & Quantity， 2009， 43（4）： 599-616.
54	Miles E W， King W C J. Gender and administration mode effects when pencil-and-paper personality tests are computerized［J］. Educational & Psychological Measurement， 1998， 58（1）： 68-76.
55	Carmines E G， Mclver J P. Analyzing models with observable variables［M］// Bohrnstedt G W， Borgatta E F. Social measurement： Current issue. CA-Sage：Beverly Hills， 1981： 65e115.
56	Seyal A， Rahman M N A， Mahbuburrahim M. Determinants of academic use of the internet： a structural equation model［J］. Behaviour & Information Technology， 2002， 21（1）： 71-86.

特征变量	类别	频数	百分比（%）
受教育程度	博士	42	27.1
	硕士	68	43.9
	学士	45	29.0
研究方向（多选）	项目管理与投资分析	101	——
	公共工程组织与管理	61
	企业战略与组织行为	47
	金融工程理论与应用	40
	运作与服务管理	28
	其他	23（0）
PPP了解程度	基本了解	51	32.9
	很了解	64	41.3
	精通	35	22.6
	专家	5	3.2
项目经验	2年及2年以下	61	39.4
	2～5年	68	43.9
	5～10年	23	14.8
	10年以上	3	1.9

测量项目	题项	标准因子荷载	α系数	CR	AVE
自我面子顾虑（s）	s1：我关心要保护自我形象	0.745	0.899	0.899	0.598
	s2：在他人面前，我不会让自己陷入困境	0.781
	s3：在他人面前，我会保护自己的尊严	0.779
	s4：我关心的是要保持自己的自信	0.805
	s5：我不愿在别人面前显示软弱	0.760
	s6：我关心的是要保护自己的自尊	0.769
承诺升级（EOC）	Money：作为决策者继续要求向项目中投入资金的意愿程度	0.731	0.743	0.745	0.493
	Time：作为决策者继续要求向项目中投入时间的意愿程度	0.680
	Labor：作为决策者继续要求向项目中投入劳动力的意愿程度	0.695

模型	CMIN/DF	RESEA	CFI	IFI	TLI
基准模型	1.132	0.035	0.978	0.979	0.969
测量权重	1.031	0.017	0.994	0.994	0.993
结构方差和协方差	1.146	0.037	0.970	0.971	0.966
测量残差	1.049	0.021	0.989	0.989	0.989
拟合优度标准	≤3	≤0.05	≥0.90	≥0.90	≥0.90

模型	DF	CMIN	P	NFI Delta-1	IFI Delta-2	RFI rho-1	TLI rho-1
假设基准模型正确
测量权重	7	1.947	0.963	0.005	0.006	-0.019	-0.024
结构方差和协方差	10	12.185	0.273	0.032	0.037	0.003	0.003
测量残差	19	15.567	0.686	0.041	0.048	-0.016	-0.020
假设测量权重模型正确
结构方差和协方差	3	10.238	0.017	0.027	0.032	0.022	0.027
测量残差	12	13.619	0.326	0.036	0.043	0.003	0.004
假设结构方差和协方差模型正确
测量残差	9	3.382	0.947	0.009	0.011	-0.019	-0.023

分组	变量	均值差异值	差异估计值的标准误差	临界比率
博士—硕士	自我面子顾虑	-0.663^**	0.207	-3.196
博士—硕士	承诺升级	-0.375	0.211	-1.782
博士—学士	自我面子顾虑	-1.205^***	0.232	-5.193
博士—学士	承诺升级	-0.540^*	0.229	-2.359
硕士—学士	自我面子顾虑	-0.662^**	0.205	-3.227
硕士—学士	承诺升级	-0.024	0.127	-0.190

Government Member's Self-face Concern and Escalation of Commitment in PPP Project: Regulation of Academic Degree

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 56

Related Articles 9

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

分组	Estimate	S.E.	C.R.	p
博士	0.772	0.199	3.874	***
硕士	0.146	0.141	1.041	0.298
学士	0.096	0.137	0.698	0.485

[1]	Xiaoxue Zhang,Jicai Liu. Research on the Risk Management Incentive Effect of Financial Institutions' Early Intervention in PPP Projects [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(7): 54-64.
[2]	Yining Zhou, Jicai Liu, Xujin Pu. Adverse Selection of Investors in PPP Project Considering Competition Scenario [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(11): 287-297.
[3]	Xiu-qin WANG,Yang LIU,Bing WANG. Research on Income Distribution of PPP Project Refinancing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(8): 51-60.
[4]	ZHOU Yi-ning, LIU Ji-cai. Study on Supervision Strategy of PPP Project Considering the Participation of Higher-Level Government [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 84-94.
[5]	WANG Xianjia, YUAN Suiqiu, LIN Zhenzhou, ZHAO Jinhua, QIN Ying. Research on Incentive Mechanism of PPP Project under Dual Information Asymmetry Based on Fair Preference [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(10): 107-120.
[6]	GAO Ruo-lan, ZHOU Yi-ning, LIU Ji-cai. Adverse Selection of Investors in PPP Projects Based on Prospect Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 36-46.
[7]	LIU Xiao-feng, WANG Xue-rong, WU Xiao-ling. Government Economic Commitment Decision-making under Difference Scenarios of Credit Environment and Revenue Type in PPP Projects [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(6): 63-72.
[8]	LIANG Xiu-feng, ZHANG Fei-lian, YAN Hong-yan. Simulation and Optimization of PPP Project Performance Payment Mechanism Based on Evolutionary Game [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(4): 153-163.
[9]	WU Xiao-ling, LIU Xiao-feng, ZHOU Jing, LU Meng-ying. Design and Selection of Optimal Compensation Contract for PPP Project Based on Private Overconfidence [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(11): 29-39.